About Me

Name: Miguel Diocuore...
Email: mikecorthell@roadrunner.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Burger Prez Now

Burger Prez Now

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dear Sarah: Say It!

Dear Sarah: Say It!


''Please, Sarah, say it ain't so. Say you're not just another pretty face. I like Jim DeMint, but hanging his picture on my office wall just doesn't cut it.''

Gov. Palin, if you want angry Americans – those who are now in the majority! – to take you seriously, here are some cheat notes for you to use in future interviews and speeches:
Barack Obama is a socialist (or, more properly, a Marxist). Say it!
Barack Obama, it obviously follows, is a radical. Say it!
Barack Obama has surrounded himself with Marxists and other radicals who want to fundamentally change America. Say it!
Barack Obama is a liar. Say it!
Barack Obama is the least transparent president in U.S. history. Say it!
Barack Obama wants to get a government-controlled health-care plan and a cap-and-trade bill passed for one reason and one reason only: to gain total control over people's lives. Say it! http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=116550
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Palin vs. WaPo's atheist

Palin vs. WaPo's atheist


''Apart from the far left, those who have followed Sarah Palin will discern that Quinn's assessment is completely opposite of what they observe. You can't watch Sarah Palin in action or in interviews without recognizing her genuineness, her graciousness, her kindness and her authentic Christian spirit.''

It seems the mainstream media's favorite pastime is to ridicule Sarah Palin. Of all the screeds I've read, I don't think any are snarkier than the Washington Post's Sally Quinn's "On Faith" blog post "Sarah Palin's 'rogue' Christianity."
Do we need further proof of the secular orientation of our dominant media culture than the fact that Quinn, an avowed atheist, pens the Post's "On Faith"
blog? That would be like featuring a column by Fidel Castro on free enterprise and individual liberties.
On her
mini -bio, Quinn writes: "I announced to my parents when I was 13 that I was an atheist. And I was a committed atheist all of my life. My view was that more evil had been done in the name of religion than anything else in the world. I saw no redeeming value in it at all. Then I met Jon Meacham and we began talking. No, Jon didn't convert me, but he did convince me that religion was not a subject to be dismissed or disdained."
If that's true, why did Quinn devote her entire blog post to dismissing and disdaining Sarah Palin's profession of faith in her book, "Going Rogue"? I must admit, though, it's difficult to tell whether Quinn is motivated more by her disdain for Sarah Palin, whom she has a history of berating, or mainstream Christianity.
She's bringing leftists to their knees with angst, but is she the best hope for the future of the GOP? Get Sarah Palin's best-seller, "Going Rogue: An American Life"
Quinn says: "Sarah Palin writes that one summer at Bible Camp she 'put my life in my creator's hands and trust Him as I sought my life's path.' For Palin, this grand divine plan was 'a natural progression,' she writes. And later, 'I don't believe in coincidences.'"
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=116598
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Weapons for the GOP punditocracy

Weapons for the GOP punditocracy


''Why are privately owned homes cared for and public housing trashed? Why do government-controlled forests burn each year at tremendous costs to the people and property they abut, while privately managed forests are spared? Why did crops rot in the collective farms run by the old Soviet communist system, but not in capitalist, commercial farms?''

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is advancing on the country with an $848 billion health-care bill in hand, which he hopes to bring to the Senate floor before he and cohorts go on holiday.
Yet the swiftest arrow in the Republican punditocracy's Obamacare quiver remains this:
If the government can't pull off the Cash For Clunkers scam, how will it handle
health care?
Or this:
If government can't manage the
gallery of the grotesque – Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security – how will it run a sixth of the economy?
When all else fails to persuade, they galvanize the argument from Hitler. Taking their cues from Rush Limbaugh, it is not uncommon for Republican commentators to pair B. Hussein's health care with Hitler's hobby horses: smoking bans, abortions, euthanasia and eugenics.
Statism's illogic exposed for all to see in F.A. Hayek's "The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism"
Hitler and the mismanagement by government of Medicare and Medicaid (but not of
the military) – this is the Republican commentariat's repertoire of riffs.
Anything but First Principles, with which the GOP has an oil-and-water relationship.
Republicans are clearly more exhausted than engaged. The same goes for the targets of their message.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=116597
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A major disaster named Hasan

A major disaster named Hasan

'Richard and the Major', a film
''I'm afraid that in the current climate, the best we can hope for is that Hasan doesn't wind up being appointed to the Joint Chiefs of Staff. But don't be too surprised if somewhere down the line he picks up a Nobel Peace Prize.''

Some friends were trying to convince me that Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan will surely be executed for conducting his one-man massacre at Fort Hood. I was willing to bet he wouldn't be. For one thing, why would he be the exception? Sirhan Sirhan wasn't executed, Charles Manson wasn't executed, even Jeffrey Dahmer wasn't executed by the state; it took a fellow inmate to dole out justice to a real-life Hannibal "The Cannibal" Lecter.
For another thing, Barack Obama, who had wasted no time denouncing the Cambridge Police Department as stupid and bigoted when his pal professor Louis Gates was momentarily inconvenienced, merely cautioned all of us not to jump to any conclusions in this matter. In spite of the fact that Maj. Hasan was a fellow who made no secret of the fact he was a devout Muslim who had no use for America and had just murdered a number of soldiers, Obama urged us to keep an open mind. At least the president stopped short of calling for a shout-out for the major.
At the same time, the head of Homeland Security, Janet "The Cannibal" Napolitano, was working overtime to guarantee there would be no backlash directed at American Muslims.
A jaw-dropping expose on the six-month undercover operation that revealed the true terror-supporting nature of CAIR: "Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That's Conspiring to Islamize America." It's also available in electronic form at reduced price through Scribd.
Considering that CAIR spouts Islamic propaganda seven days a week and that America's Muslims, under the guise of supporting charities, funnel funds to Hamas and Hezbollah whenever the FBI isn't watching, why are we supposed to be so concerned about hurting their feelings? Lest you regard this as mere partisanship, I used to ask the same question when Bush and Condi Rice kept telling us, as if they were proselytizing for Islam, what a wonderful religion it is.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=116541
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bill Press defends the 'retarded thoughts' - again

Bill Press defends the 'retarded thoughts' - again


''Unlike the rest of the country, most New Yorkers understand reality. They're not afraid of Khalid Sheik Mohammed. They trust law enforcement to keep them safe. They trust the courts to do their job. They like bringing KSM back to the scene of the crime to remind people of the evil done. And they're happy that, with proceedings in Manhattan, families of the victims of Sept. 11 will have easier access to the trial.''

This week, in the bars, restaurants and subways of the city that never sleeps, one topic dominated all others. Not Sarah Palin, Afghanistan, or health-care reform. But Khalid Sheik Mohammed.
It all started when Attorney General Eric Holder announced that the Justice Department was bringing KSM, self-declared mastermind of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, from Guantanamo Bay prison to lower Manhattan – to be tried along with four co-conspirators in federal civilian court. To which right-wingers around the rest of the country reacted with horror, while New Yorkers I talked to responded with a mix of indifference and pride.
Big Apple Mayor Rudy Giuliani, the self-declared spokesman for all things post-9/11, leads the opposition to a New York trial, accusing President Obama of "giving an unfair advantage to the terrorists." Giuliani asserts: "We generally don't bring people back to the scene of the crime for justice."
Oh, really? Perhaps Giuliani forgot that the first trial of a foreign terrorist, the so-called "Blind Sheik," Omar Abdel-Rahman, took place, without incident, in the very same lower Manhattan federal courthouse. For his role in the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, Rahman was convicted and sentenced to life in prison in 1996 – while Giuliani was still mayor! At the time, Giuliani hailed the verdict as demonstrating "that New Yorkers won't meet violence with violence, but with a far greater weapon – the law."
Apparently, the mayor also forgot praising the Bush Justice Department that same year for bringing Zacarias Moussaoui to trial in a federal civilian court in Alexandria, Va., where he was also found guilty and sent to rot in prison for life. In other words, for Giuliani and other brainwashed Republicans, it was OK for George Bush to try terrorists on U.S. soil, but not OK for Barack Obama.
Perhaps the most curious objection came from Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley, who's worried that history might repeat itself. "I think a lot of Americans thought O.J. Simpson ought to have been convicted of murder," warned Grassley, "rather than being in jail for what he's in jail for now."
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=116615
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

As a conservative woman, I say...

As a conservative woman, I say...


''Ask yourself if you are willing to fight for a return to Conservatism regardless of the cost. Will you stand for truth at the risk of scrutiny? Ask yourself if you feel compelled to change your world, one person at a time, one situation at a time. Does your world matter to you?''

As a conservative woman, I want to send a clear message to other conservative women: YOU ARE POWERFUL! And because you are, you have a mandate to engage in society at some level and powerfully become a beacon of truth in whatever haven of falsehood affects your world.
Throughout our nation’s history, many powerful women have lived as models of courage and leadership in declaring the truth regarding God, family, and country. Through their undying support of, and belief in, the truth, coupled with their own inspiration to live in a land free from tyranny and oppression, these courageous women fought for the very same ideals in decades past that we are fighting to maintain today. Most were ordinary women who faced extraordinary circumstances, and in that moment, decided to take a stand at all costs for what they believed to be true.
Contrary to what many liberals would have us to believe, Conservatism is back on the radar in America. Through no small feat, it has arrived at this point and is gaining momentum with each passing day. Enduring years of liberal bias, mistreatment, and scorn, the defenders of liberty, justice, and Constitutional rights are emerging stronger than ever. Those who espouse conservative ideals are voicing their opinions regarding the present state of America, despite a crass liberalism that goes to great lengths to convince us that Conservatism is dead and gone, or, at the very least, outdated and irrelevant for the times in which we live. http://www.newswithviews.com/Selena/owens100.htm
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Right Viewpoint: In Search of the Holy Grail

The Right Viewpoint: In Search of the Holy Grail


Congress and President Obama continue to push for reform in our nation’s health care system. The holy grail of their pursuit is to keep it “deficit neutral” but even if they raise enough taxes to pay for it, this monstrosity will still hurt the economy.
Does anyone really believe the administration, Nancy Pelosi or Harry Reid when they talk about health care reform being ” deficit neutral”? In point of fact they only get there by promising hundreds of billions of dollars in cuts to Medicare. But these are cuts that will never materialize. They also don’t include the bill they are trying to pass right now to increase the payments Medicare makes to doctors. In other words, they are promising to make cuts while they are undoing cuts they already made. But even this standard piece of Washington baloney misses the point.
Any increase in the size of government, even one paid for entirely, will destroy jobs. Government does not and can not create wealth. It simply can’t. This is a fact not open to discussion. Government can’t create jobs. Government can provide jobs, short term, by public spending and you will hear politicians claim they have created jobs. This is false because for every one job government “creates” more than one job is destroyed in the private sector.
Government can spend money on a great many things. They can hire ten people to dig ten holes and claim they have created ten jobs. But once the holes are dug, you have ten people without jobs and ten holes. In the meantime they had to pay for it. Government can only pay for its holes in one of three ways. They can tax the money from the private sector, they can borrow the money from the private sector, or they can print the money which steals the money from the private sector through inflation. Which ever means they use, the money comes from the private sector and crowds out real economic activity that creates wealth and long term economic prosperity. This is simple fact. Because of this economic dynamic, government spending, any government spending, destroys jobs.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Is our children learning?

Is our children learning?


''"In the university , all men are not equal. Those better endowed or better equipped intellectually must be preferred in admission, and preferred in recognition. ... If we give in to the ... demands of militants to admit persons to the university because of their race, their poverty, their illiteracy or any other nonintellectual distinction, our universities can no longer serve all of us or any of us." The limousine liberals knew better.''

As George W. Bush famously asked, "Is our children learning?"
Apparently not in the twin capitals of liberalism, D.C. and New York.
In a ranking of 50 states and D.C. by how much each spent per pupil in public schools in 2005, New York ranked first; D.C. third. The state spent $14,100, and New York City just a tad less.
And the bountiful fruits of this massive transfer of taxpayers' wealth?
In D.C., nearly half of all black and Latino students drop out. Of those who graduate, nearly half are reading and doing math at seventh-, eighth- and ninth-grade levels. D.C. academic achievement ranks 51st, last in the U.S.
Yet last week came a report from New York that makes D.C look like M.I.T. Some 200 students, in their first math class at City University of New York, were tested on their basic math skills.
Ninety percent could not do basic
algebra. One-third could not convert a decimal into a fraction.
If this was a representative sampling, nine in 10 CUNY students not only do not belong in college, they do not qualify for their high school diplomas. As for that third who can't do decimals and fractions, they should not have been allowed into high school until they could do sixth-grade math.
With data that will shock the objective observer, "The Harsh Truth About Public Schools" explains why more Americans are yanking their kids from the government system
As 70 percent of all CUNY students are graduates of city schools, a question arises: What are the taxpayers of New York getting for the highest tax rates in the nation?
If a private
business annually turned out products that were of inferior quality than the year before, management would be thrown out by the board. Yet, the education racket has been shaking us down for four decades, and turning out graduates that know less and less.
Scholastic Aptitude Test scores peaked around 1964. Ever since, the national average has been in an almost unbroken descent.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=116599
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Transcript: More liberal, lesbian laughs

Transcript: More liberal, lesbian laughs


Rachel Maddow: With our president overseas, Republicans and conservatives here at home have been taking the opportunity to crank up their criticism of him. Former Vice President Cheney telling Politico.com that President Obama advertised weakness when he bowed ceremonially to the emperor of Japan. Cheney said, quote, “Our friends and allies don‘t expect it and our enemies see it as a sign of weakness. There is no reason for an American president to bow to anyone.”
He does have a point. I mean, imagine an American president bowing to anyone. [Maddow displays photos of various U.S. presidents bowing to foreign leaders] Imagine. Imagine, say, oh, President Nixon bowing to Chairman Mao in China. Imagine, say, President Nixon -- oh, there he is, again, bowing to Japanese Emperor Hirohito, that was here in America. Imagine President Eisenhower bowing to Charles de Gaulle of France -- France!
And four our pals in the press, when a former vice president, like,  Cheney says something like there‘s no reason for an American president to bow to anyone, the appropriate response is to say, “What else do you have against President Eisenhower, sir, or President Nixon?” Or you could just copy down what Cheney says and write a whole story as if Cheney really has a point, which, of course, he doesn‘t—at all. But I digress.
Beyond the former vice president, Mr. Obama‘s trip abroad has generally brought out the unhinged among the president‘s critics. The troubled conservative “Washington Times” newspaper, for example, allowed their editor emeritus, Wesley Pruden, to assess President Obama‘s trip abroad this way, quote, “”Mr. Obama, unlike his predecessors, likely knows no better. It‘s no fault of the president that he has no natural instinct or blood impulse for what the America of the 57 states is about. He was sired by a Kenyan father, born to a mother attracted to men of the third world and reared by grandparents in Hawaii, a paradise far from the American mainstream.”
That was published in an actual newspaper.
On an actual cable TV channel, host Glenn Beck assessed Democratic efforts at health reform with equal intellectual rigor:
Genn Beck, Fox Host: America has spoken clearly, consistently, we are—excuse this analogy but I feel like it‘s true—we‘re the young girls saying, “No, no, help me” and the government is Roland Polanski.
Maddow: From the same network, another host, Bill O‘Reilly, couldn‘t help himself either, calling into Mr. Beck‘s radio program with this warning to the Democratic speaker of the House:
Bill O' Reilly, Fox Host: I think people, when they figure out how badly they‘re going to get hurt in the next few years, there‘s going to be a tea party on taxes and it‘s going to get nasty. Nancy Pelosi is going to be bobbing up and down in the Boston Harbor.
Maddow: And then, there‘s this biblical quote making the rounds in anti-Obama circles. As reported this week in the “Christian Science Monitor,” “Pray for President Obama, Psalm 109, verse eight.” What‘s psalm 109 version eight? Well, it reads, “Let his days be few; and let another take his office.” Let his days be few. It‘s followed immediately by another verse, “Let his children be fatherless, and his wife a widow.”
And don‘t forget, that sentiment is now being merchandised on bumper stickers, on mouse pads, on Teddy Bears on aprons, framed tiles—those are nice. Keepsake boxes, t-shirts? “Let his days be few”—cute on a Teddy Bear.
Has anybody else crept out by this?
Joining us now is Frank Schaeffer, whose father, Francis Schaeffer helped shape the evangelical movement in the United States. Mr. Shafer grew up in the religious far-right and he‘s the author of “Patience with God: Faith for People Who Don‘t Like Religion (or Atheism).”
Mr. Schaeffer, thanks very much for coming back on the show.
Frank Schaeffer: Thanks for having me on.
Maddow: “Let his days be few; and let another take his office,” “Let his children be fatherless, and his wife a widow.” This is such strong language in secular terms about President Obama. Can you tell me if this means something less threatening to people hearing this in a biblical context?
Schaeffer: No, actually, it means something more threatening. I think the situation that I find genuinely frightening right now is that you have a ramping up of biblical language—language from the antiabortion movement, for instance, death panels and this sort of thing. And what it‘s coalescing into is branding Obama as Hitler, as they‘ve already called him, as something foreign to our shores. We‘re reminded of that. He‘s born in Kenya—as brown, as black, above all, as not us. He is Sarah Palin‘s not a real American.
But now, it turns out, that he joins the ranks of the unjust kings of ancient Israel, unjust rulers, to which all these biblical illusions are directed who should be slaughtered, if not by God, then by just men.
So, there‘s a direct parallel here with Timothy McVeigh‘s t-shirt on the day of the Oklahoma City bombing in which he said that the tree of liberty had to be watered occasionally by the blood of tyrants. And that quote, we saw again at a meeting at which Obama was present being carried on a placard by someone carrying a loaded weapon.
What we‘re looking at right now is two things going on. We see the evangelical groups that I talk about in my new book, “Patience with God,” enthralled by an apocalyptic vision that I go into in some detail there. They represent the millions of people who have turned the “Left Behind” series into best sellers. Most of them are not crazy, they‘re just deluded.
But there is a crazy fringe to whom all these little messages that have been pouring out of FOX News, now on a bumper sticker, talking about doing away with Obama, asking God to kill him.
Really, this is trolling for assassins. And this is serious business.
It‘s un-American. It‘s unpatriotic.
And it goes to show that the religious right, the Republican far right, have coalesced into a group that truly want American revolution. And if it turns out to be blood in the streets and death, so be it. This is not funny stuff anymore. They cannot be dismissed as just crazies on the fringe. It only takes one.
You know, look at “The Boston Globe” article a few weeks ago saying that the threat level faced by the Secrete Service has gone up 400 percent, higher than any other time in 52 years for any president, Democrat or Republican. These are no jokes.
And as I talk about in “Patience with God,” if you trace these origins back to this paranoid, evangelical group, of which me and my father, sadly, were not only leaders, but leaders in the ‘70s and ‘80s, the foot soldiers that people like  Armey and others are using now to push their political agenda onto health care, are also people that have within their ranks, people, such as the person who murdered Dr. Tiller and killed three police officers in Pittsburgh because they thought Obama would take away their guns.
This bumper sticker simply says to them: “It‘s open season.”
Maddow: And to be clear—I mean, over-the-top political criticism is as American as apple pie. And incredibly intense criticism has been lobbied against George W. Bush and against every president that‘s gone before modern times. But you‘re saying that there‘s essentially a religious inflection in the most extreme of the commentary against Obama, that sort—that‘s operating on a religious level, that‘s a signal to a religiously-minded audience.
Schaeffer: Absolutely. Look, this is the American version of the Taliban. The Taliban quotes the Quran and al Qaeda quotes certain verses in the Quran, in and out of context, calling for jihad and bloody war and the curse of Allah on infidels.
This is the Old Testament biblical equivalent of calling for “Holy War.” Now, most Americans will just see the bumper sticker and smile and think that it‘s facetious. Unfortunately, there are 22 million Americans or so who just call themselves super-conservative evangelicals. Of this, a small minority might be violent, but the general atmosphere here is really getting heated.
And what surprises me is that responsible—if you can put it that way—Republican leadership and the editors of some of these Christian magazines, et cetera, et cetera, do not stand-up in holy hour (ph) and denounce this.
You know, they‘re always asking, “Where is the Islamic leadership denouncing terrorism? Why aren‘t the moderates speaking out?” Well, I challenge the folks who I used to work with, that I talk about in my book, “Patience with God,” and I would just say to them, “Where the hell are you? This is not funny anymore. And be it on your head if something happens to our president, if you are going to go around supporting and not speaking out against this stuff.
It‘s just not a question of who‘s doing it. The bigger question is: Where are the people speaking out against these things? I don‘t hear those voices raised in the evangelical fundamentalist community. And until I do, I—and my opinion is, they are culpable.
One last thing on this, I think it points at the fact that Obama supporters, of which I have been one since he began running, have better start speaking up in support of him and not sniping at him all the time because he‘s not moving toward change as fast as we‘d like in every area. This is serious stuff. The chips are down. He has real enemies. Some of them are violent.
And as far as I‘m concerned, it‘s time to support our president, stand with him, and not only wish him the best, but as a believing Christian myself, pray for his safety in the face of these religious maniacs, who every day, you know, one time I was on your show awhile back and they were talking about, “Is he the antichrist?” Now, they are asking he‘s an unjust ruler and they‘re asking God to strike him down. There are very not many steps left on this insane path.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Jobs – they're in there!

Jobs – they're in there!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Burger Prez Now

Burger Prez Now

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Biblical Open Borders?

Biblical Open Borders?


''Leftist Christians push open borders. Church leaders twist Scripture to advocate for amnesty.''

Pushing for open borders is the latest fad for the Religious and Evangelical Left. The National Association of Evangelicals (NAE), National Council of Churches (NCC) and United Methodist Council of Bishops have all recently chimed in, essentially endorsing New York Senator Chuck Schumer’s effort to revive the failed 2007 Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act (CIR) offering higher legal immigration and eventual amnesty for existing illegals.
Does the Bible specifically call for a virtual open borders policy and abrogation of immigration law enforcement? Not really. The Religious Left, now as always, selectively extracts Scripture to justify its latest political cause. Broad biblical calls for mercy and compassion always mystically mandate the Left’s most recent social and cultural demands.
The Religious Left insistence on virtual immigration law non-enforcement and near open borders often depends on mythologizing the “sojourners” of the Bible, whom liberal prelates insist were holy immigrants entitled to limitless hospitality from whatever nation they blessed with a visit. Of course, most of these biblical sojourners had the permission of the civil authority when visiting a foreign land, as Abraham did in Egypt, until Pharaoh compelled him to leave. The Religious Left usually forgets that part.
In typical fashion, the Religious Left on immigration law, as on so many other issues, falsely claims that Christianity has a clear political teaching. It also chronically confuses the church’s responsibilities with the government’s, imagines that divine grace works through unlimited state welfare programs, ignores scriptural injunctions for law enforcement, neglects to distinguish morally between legal and illegal immigrants, usually avoids contrasting refugees fleeing for their lives compared to immigrants seeking economic advance, fails to admit that open U.S. borders benefits Mexicans who can walk into the country at the expense of more impoverished Asians and Africans who must wait in line, patronizingly assumes that all immigrants have the same interchangeable interests; disregards the impact of unregulated immigration on lower income Americans as well as on legal immigrants; ignores national security concerns, and insists that the American people, including its foreign born, uniquely among all the world’s nations, must unendingly offer automatic citizenship and subsidies to a global population.
http://www.theird.org/Page.aspx?pid=1263&frcrld=1
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Trying terrorists, or Bush-Cheney?

Trying terrorists, or Bush-Cheney?


''The Obama administration is more dangerous to America in many ways than any terrorist organization. What this cabal is doing to the country in stripping it of its most cherished values, its basic morality, its foundation on the rule of law, its liberties and its economy is more devastating than anything Mohammed and his zealots could have ever imagined.'' Khalid Sheikh Mohammed has already had a trial and been convicted of orchestrating the 9/11 attacks on the U.S. that killed nearly 3,000.
He should have been put to death by now.
Instead, the Barack Obama administration is going to give him another trial – a civilian trial in New York City, of all places – where his defense team will be able to use all the gimmickry and technicalities available to American citizens trying to beat the rap.
"Was our client read his Miranda rights?" they will ask.
"How many times was he waterboarded?"
"Was any of the evidence you are using against our clients obtained illegally?"
They will attempt to turn the trial into a circus in which George W. Bush and Rick Cheney are actually accused of crimes – probably much to the satisfaction of the Obama administration, which views their actions in bringing this mass murderer to justice as illegal.
Obama's attorney general, Eric Holder, already announced he would investigate whether CIA officers should be prosecuted for their interrogations of Mohammed and others. Maybe instead of prosecuting this monster, he might be called to testify on behalf of the defense.
If I were in Mohammed's shoes, I certainly would.
Once again, it goes to prove the point that the Obama administration doesn't view even the kind of monstrous terrorism that struck on 9/11 as anything but a criminal justice matter.
A jaw-dropping expose on the six-month undercover operation that revealed the true terror-supporting nature of CAIR: "Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That's Conspiring to Islamize America." It's also available in electronic form at reduced price through Scribd.
It's not. It's war.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=116415
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

It's hard to lead from a bowing position

It's hard to lead from a bowing position


''When you are down bowing to another leader, it is very hard position in which to lead the free world. Obama's way over his head, and it shows. ''

President Obama, trying to escape the turmoil he has created in the USA with an over-aggressive legislative agenda, is spending time overseas – but obviously, he is way over his head abroad, too.
Obama sets the record for countries visited during a president's first year. In 10 months' time, he has visited 20 countries. Even with all his globetrotting, Obama returns from his multitude of
trips with no real accomplishments or agreements. His most recent expedition to Asia was an abject failure for America.
Proudly strutting into office promising a new foreign policy based on cooperation and international brotherhood, Obama pledged to do away with what he called "Bush's
cowboy diplomacy." Rather, he would sit down with world leaders, playing nicey-nice, building a multilateral consensus. His magic words may have persuaded naïve American voters, but thus far he is having no such luck when it comes to foreign heads of state.
Obama is no stranger to failure in foreign relations, unless you believe apologizing for your country's past defines success. In previous attempts at diplomacy, Obama failed to negotiate commitments from Europe on troops in Afghanistan, bowed to the king of Saudi Arabia and botched our once close relationship with the British.
Obama's Asian trip soured rapidly after he bowed before the emperor of Japan. Obama has shown a penchant for prostrating himself before foreign leaders, giving visual representation to how he is seeking to submit America to the desires of foreign powers. Obama bent so low it approached the level of groveling to the diminutive son of the man who ordered the bombing of Pearl Harbor.
Next, when attending the Association of Southeast Asian Nations, Obama shook hand with Gen. Thein Sein, the prime minister appointed by a vicious and brutal military junta in Myanmar. By shaking hands and
meeting with this unelected dictator, Obama sends a message to all those fighting for freedom across the world: America is no longer standing with you, but with your oppressors. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=116490
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous12345678910576577Next »