''They weren't happy with George W. Bush. They didn't embrace John McCain. But they recognize more clearly than ever the change they were promised in 2008 was not the change the country needed.''
Next year could well mark the beginning of the end of the Democratic Party as we have known it since 1972.
That was the year the George McGovernites took over the party. It has never been the same since.
McGovern was the presidential nominee that year – a man who called for an immediate end to the Vietnam War and a federally guaranteed minimum annual salary of $10,000.
It was a radical departure from what had previously been the party of Hubert Humphrey and John Kennedy, liberals in the traditional sense but hardly radicals.
In 1976, the party faithful attempted to return to the center with the nomination of Jimmy Carter, but they unwittingly elected an impostor in the mold of McGovern. Democrats have not had an opportunity to vote for a true moderate for president since.
In electing Barack Obama as president last year, Democrats got the radical party activists they have been seeking ever since 1972 – a man completely out of step with American ideals of free enterprise, strong defense and personal freedom.
With Democrats in control of the House of Representatives, the Senate and the Supreme Court, it might appear that the party is in the political driver's seat. But it is actually on the precipice of a historic setback that could force Democrats to re-evaluate their most basic ideals or face a realignment that could shatter the party's shaky coalition for years to come.
The polls tell the story. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=120322