Posted by
Corthell on Wednesday, March 10, 2010 4:26:23 PM
''While pro-aborts don't want to hear about it when a "safe and legal" abortion goes bad, or about the multitude of after-affects, pro-lifers stay to help pick up the pieces.'' Last
week I wrote about Angie Jackson, who began live tweeting her RU-486 abortion on Feb. 18 to "demystify" us, thinking it would be a "4 hour bleed out."
We learned together Jackson was grossly uninformed about the medical abortion process.
For nine days Jackson tweeted about recurring headaches, nausea, vomiting, bleeding, pelvic pain, backaches, and cramping so bothersome she went through an entire bottle of 20 Tylenol with codeine in a week and had to ask for more (which she was apparently denied, tweeting Feb. 27, "This is definitely the most pain so far. It's distracting & makes me unhappy… Ibuprofin is a joke, ya'll").
Maybe coming out of codeine la-la land caused Jackson to realize tweeting the painful details of her abortion did not bode well for her RU-486 promotion campaign, because it was on that day she stopped, also noting with aggravation that I was blogging what she wrote.
Thereafter Jackson became quite fuzzy and distant about her symptoms, such as on March 5, 15 days into it, when she vaguely wrote about "nausea and other things going on." What other things?
At the end of last week's column, I compressed Jackson's tweets describing her ordeal, worth the read. I don't think a pro-abort has ever so openly given a blow-by-blow account of her RU-486 abortion. I've added a short addendum of Jackson's tweets written after my column was published. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=127413