Palestinians – they'd rather be killing Jews

Some men will tell a woman anything to seduce her and vice versa. Why? Because it's human nature to say what you have to say when you desire something bad enough. For life, for liberty, for love, you find the words. But how about for land? The land lust the Palestinians have for the Jewish homeland has had them not only salivating at the chops, but has had both peoples dripping with blood and sharing the good earth – underground. Yet what remains most telling of the Palestinian agenda is not so much what they won't do as regards Netanyahu's recent speech, but what they will not say: Israel has the right to exist and is the state of the Jewish people.

And that is why Netanyahu's speech was very wise, despite the naysayers on all sides. (Indeed, it is only the Middle East where you can't please any of the people any of the time.) What Netanyahu's speech served to do was multifold. To start, the location of the speech, held at Bar-Ilan University's Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, was certainly symbolic and a silent call to Arab leadership to emulate the courage of Anwar Sadat. (And by the way, is there a Rabin Center in any Arab University?). But in not mentioning the name of Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, Netanyahu served to undermine Abbas' already tenuous grip on power and as such sent him – the would-be partner in peace – into a rhetorical tailspin evoking the next intifada. The demonizing of Israel is always a way to galvanize political support for Palestinian leaders. The juxtaposition of Abbas' reaction to Bibi's policy speech that invoked the word "peace" 43 times served well to illustrate the mentality and temperaments Israel is surrounded by. They won't even whisper sweet nothings to get Israel into bed; they just want to shtup them right out. Though the West may refer to Abbas as "a moderate," it may serve to be reminded that he is a Holocaust denier, a denial which was the basis of his Ph.d. thesis, making him a moderate who has a lot in common with Ahmadinejad. And whereas Ahmadinejad wants to wipe Israel off the map, Abbas has yet to recognize that Israel is on it.

"We want to live with you in peace, as good neighbors," Netanyahu said in his address. "I know the face of war. I have experienced battle. I lost close friends; I lost a brother. I have seen the pain of bereaved families. I do not want war. No one in Israel wants war." But good thing Netanyahu was once coined the man most women would want to share a bomb shelter with, or Abbas' rejection might have left him hurt and lonely. To Bibi's outstretched hand the Palestinians responded: "It's obvious, in the aftermath of this speech, that we are headed toward another round of violence and bloodshed," according to a Haaretz article. If a mere policy speech can launch a new intifada, hmmm, maybe, just maybe the Palestinians aren't quite ready to love their neighbors as themselves.

WND's Aaron Klein gets to the heart of Israel's decline in his new book, "The Late Great State of Israel: How Enemies Within and Without Threaten the Jewish Nation's Survival"

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=101314

 

Inscriptions on a monument in Mexico include a column (on the left-hand side) that gives its date on the Mayan Long Count calendar, which ends - along with the world as we know it, some say - in 2012.

The ancient Mayan calendar ends on Dec. 21, 2012, prompting some to believe the End Time is nigh.

At last month's Cannes Film Festival, pedestrians strolling along the seafront were startled one night by a thunderous roll of timpani and a fountain of water shooting up from the Mediterranean 10 metres into the air.

It was enough to make you jump out of your skin. It was enough to make you think that the world might be ending, especially after reading the giant green letters projected onto the spray of water: "2012," it said. "We have been warned."

The nonplussed French turned to each other and shrugged: 2012, qu'est-ce que c'est?

He may be the most mysterious and secretive president in American history. Though inexperienced and arguably unqualified for the presidency, he mesmerized the entire establishment press and more than half of voters, many regarding him nothing short of a political messiah. Though he can barely speak publicly without a teleprompter,  he's praised as a transcendent communicator. Though his voting record is extreme left, he portrays himself as a pragmatic centrist.

But beyond Obama's political ideology, many Americans are troubled also by his strange personality attributes: He greatly exaggerates his achievements, expects constant praise and admiration, believes he's special, doesn't appear to concern himself with other people's feelings, expresses disdain for those he feels are inferior, sets unrealistic goals, appears as tough-minded and unemotional, and other qualities – all of which are textbook symptoms of Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

Indeed, the word "narcissist" is increasingly being applied to America's 44th president. Pulitzer prize-winning columnist and former psychiatrist Charles Krauthammer asks, "Does the narcissism of this man know no bounds?" Jack Kelly, journalist and former high-ranking Reagan administration Pentagon official, says: "The most dangerous thing about having a narcissist in a position of power is his unwillingness – perhaps his inability – to ever admit error. ... Obama acknowledged the troop surge in Iraq has produced dramatic improvements, but said he still would oppose it." Radio giant Rush Limbaugh said of Obama recently: "He's supremely narcissistic … This is all about him. This has nothing to do with the country. It has nothing to do with our way of life. Every aspect of his presidency is about building him up, making him appear to be savior, messiah …"

Is the president of the United States indeed a narcissist, a condition psychology and psychiatry recognize as a serious personality disorder?

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=97201

2012: The Destroyer Is Unleashed

Signs of a conspiracy: Mystical numbers, contagious ideas

“Yes, Lucifer is God, and unfortunately Adonay (Jehovah) is also God. For the eternal Law is that there is no light without shade, no beauty without ugliness, no white without black. For the Absolute can only exist as two Gods: darkness being necessary to light to serve as its foil as the pedestal is necessary to the statue and the brake to the locomotive. The… true and pure philosophic Religion ‘is the belief in Lucifer,’ the equal of Adonay; but Lucifer, God of Light and God of Good, is struggling for humanity against Adonay, the God of Darkness and Evil.” — Albert Pike, Sovereign Grand Commander of the Scottish Rite Freemasonry
In the previous entry, the Akedah or story of the “binding of Isaac” on Moriah proved enlightening when viewed within the distorted importance the story holds for the occultists and their plans. An equally important lesson from the Moriah narrative related to phenomena before and after 9/11 includes how nation-influencing angels—both good and evil—can be “loosed” or “bound” above countries based on decisions made by and allowed of national leaders. In the Moriah example, Abraham’s obedience not only resulted in an angel staying the sacrifice of Isaac, but according to the Genesis Rabba from Judaism’s classical period (a collection of rabbinical homilies on the book of Genesis) Abraham’s submission directly affected the angelic “princes of the heathens” as well.
From Genesis Rabbah, 56:5 we read:
Here God immediately rewards Israel when Abraham binds Isaac to the altar by binding the princes of the heathens—the angels who served as guardians to the heathen nations—thus making them subservient to Israel. But this fettering only lasts while Israel upholds its part of the covenant with God. When Israel fails to do so, God unfetters the princes, and the heathen nations take their revenge on Israel. [1]
In view of recent history and given scriptural support for the idea that supernatural forces can be loosed or bound above nations in response to government conduct, speeches, symbols, rituals and gestures, we note with special interest who history identifies as the spirit that rules the very territory the Bush administration joined the United States in conflict with—Ahriman, the most powerful of all dark angels. Ahriman is indirectly referred to as the “prince” over Iraq/Babylon in the tenth chapter of Daniel, where the prophet had been fasting and praying for twenty-one days, hoping the God of Israel would see his fast and grant him revelation of Israel’s future. On the twenty-first day of his fast, the angel Gabriel appears and informs Daniel, “. . . from the first day thou didst set thine heart to understand, and to chasten thyself before thy God, thy words were heard, and I am come for thy words” (Dan. 10.12). If an angel had been dispatched from heaven from the first day, why did it take twenty-one days before he arrived? Gabriel provided the answer by explaining that a supernatural Persian “prince” had opposed him for twenty-one days. Not until Michael, the archangel, came to assist in this conflict was Gabriel free to continue his journey (Dan. 10.13).
http://www.newswithviews.com/Horn/thomas105.htm

Lately it seems that there is an inescapable apocalyptic tenor resounding throughout the world. Humanity, still sickened from the world financial crisis, has recently been thrust into a stage-5 condition of pandemic pandemonium! Mexicans are afraid to breath on one another, Egyptians are slaughtering thousands of pigs, and many Americans are quarantining their children from public schools – and that's just one unhealthy dose of daily news!

World-changing events are emerging at an alarming pace, causing Christian eschatologists to write last days articles faster than Scott rolls out toilet tissue and world governments print funny money to fill the bottomless financial pit. Unknowingly paralleling their concerns, even President Obama recently declared that after 100 days in office "the number of critical issues that appear to be coming to a head all at the same time" surprises him. Newscaster Glenn Beck of Fox News echoes similar sentiment by suggesting there appears to be a "perfect storm" coming, alluding to the advance of powerful world-changing events building one upon another in rapid succession.

Interestingly, Jesus Christ predicted approximately 2,000 years ago in Matthew 24:7-8 that world wars would come and be followed by cataclysmic events like regional wars, pandemic pestilences, earthquakes and famines in various places. He called it a time of travail and likened it to a woman having birth pangs. His birthing illustration envisions catastrophic events occurring with greater frequency and intensity as the end of time nears, similar to the way a woman's contractions increase as her child begins departure from the womb.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=97378