Posted by
Diocuore on Thursday, June 11, 2009 5:08:23 PM

''You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father's desire. He was a murderer from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him. When he lies, he speaks his native language, for he is a liar and the father of lies.Yet because I tell the truth, you do not believe me!''
The presidency of George W. Bush – his popularity, approval numbers and so forth – was razed to the ground on the basis of one invalid claim: "Bush lied" (regarding his accusation that Saddam Hussein's regime possessed weapons of mass destruction, this being the justification for invading Iraq).
Let's assume, just for the sake of an amusing mental exercise, that President Bush's charge was indeed a lie. If this lie was Hurricane Katrina (actually an amusing if ironic analogy in itself), it pales beside the Great Flood of omissions, rationalizations and outright fabrications to which Americans are subjected on a regular basis by President Obama.
But it just doesn't matter.
One could enumerate the dozens of statements Obama woodenly delivered during the 2008 campaign that were assertions only a fool would believe, but could not be directly proven: His ignorance of Rev. Jeremiah Wright's racism, unawareness of William Ayers' terrorist past, and non-involvement with the nefarious Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN). Yet, these are trifles compared to the counterfeit oratory he's pulled off with impunity since becoming president.
Obama's goal? Replace the Judeo-Christian values that gave birth to the "land of the free" with failed radical leftist beliefs – get Brad O'Leary's "The Audacity of Deceit"
I had an acquaintance in high school who was a pathological liar. It was very sad, but almost comical to hear the effluvia of flamboyant falsehoods that spilled from his lips, not unlike Jon Lovitz's character on "Saturday Night Live." Every day he enthusiastically presented at least one grandiose fabrication to his associates. You knew he was lying. He knew he was lying. I suspect he knew that you knew he was lying. This means it's probable that he knew that you knew that he knew he was lying.
But still he lied.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=100728
Media: From attack dog to lap dog
Larry Elder hammers press for dearth of reports questioning Obama's actions
Obama and his fawning press
Phil Bronstein: 'We're in love, lust, or just a whole lot of like'