About Me

Name: Miguel Diocuore...
Email: mikecorthell@roadrunner.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Evidence Mounts That Jihad Motivated Fort Hood Shooter

Evidence Mounts That Jihad Motivated Fort Hood Shooter


Evidence Mounts That Jihad Motivated Fort Hood Shooter
The FBI and other officials who discount the idea that Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan's slayings of 13 people was a terrorist act aren't in touch with the reality that evidence abounds that Hasan's Muslim background motivated him.
FULL STORY
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Newer Feminism

The Newer Feminism


Sarah Palin and the Leaders of the Newer Feminism
They are business executives. Political movers and shakers. Sports icons. Media moguls. They're the most prominent women who are redefining womanhood in 21st-century America. Newsmax magazine's special report "Sarah Palin and the Leaders of the Newer Feminism" profiles 21 strong women living on their own terms and setting the standard for today's female. FULL STORY
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Keep up the health-care pressure

Keep up the health-care pressure


As expected, the House of Representatives under the leadership of Nancy Pelosi passed the bill that would take away your personal options on health care and make it the business of the U.S. government.
It's a travesty that such a slim majority of the
House could trigger such an unconstitutional and draconian action.
But don't despair.
Don't get mad. Get even.
Some 220 members of the House are now, politically speaking, dead men walking. They have placed targets on their backs for the 2010 midterm elections. They have given the American people a year to plan retribution. And the planning should begin immediately.
It starts by continuing to put them on notice.
WND's "pink slip" program will continue until further notice. It's the perfect way to make your voice heard. And, keep in mind, these same members of Congress can create much more mischief in the year ahead. They need to know you are watching.
So far,
4.5 million of the pink slips have been sent to all 535 members of Congress. We're creeping up on the unprecedented 5 million mark. Let's make sure none of the members who voted for the nationalization of the health-care system will be without excuse. Keep up the pressure, now more than ever. None of those 220 members should have a restful night's sleep between now and next November. So, if you haven't yet participated in the "pink slips" campaign, it's not too late.
The dark cloud of the action Saturday night could actually have a silver lining.
Nationalization of health care is extremely unpopular with the American people. It will take some time for a bill to be passed by the Senate, for
conference committees to reconcile the two bills, for Barack Obama to sign it into law. It is unlikely the transformation of our health-care system could even be under way a year from now. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=115491
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Evidence grows that Obama is not an American citizen

Evidence grows that Obama is not an American citizen


''Now we stand at the precipice of the totalitarian state with a man occupying the White House, usurping the Oval Office, who isn't an American; who has, by his own actions and words, declared himself a Marxist.''

Tomorrow is Veterans Day, commemorating our men and women who fought (and died) to keep this country free under the Constitution and Bill of Rights established by our Founding Fathers.
On November 4, 2008, Barack Hussein Obama was elected to the office of president of the United States. The evidence grows that Obama is not an American citizen, was not eligible to the office he holds, should never have been allowed on the ballot in any of the 50 states.
1. Not one of the Senators of Representatives in Congress has actually seen Obama's birth certificate. They have seen pictures of a document posted on the internet, but they have not seen the actual birth certificate.
2. Hawaii claims to hold a birth certificate for Obama but that does not mean Obama was born in Hawaii. At the time Obama contends he was born (1961), Hawaii (Act 96, Session Laws of 1911, Special Session of 1909 and the Organic Act) allowed for the birth registration, in Hawaii, of foreign-born children. Until the actual birth certificate is produced and examined; where Obama was actually born is unknown and unproven.
3. No Hawaiian hospital is willing to own up to Obama being born there. Meanwhile, Obama and his half-sister have claimed he was born at two different hospitals. When Obama finally decided he was born at one particular hospital, internet sites set about to "correct" their stories to reflect his unproven claims, including the left-wing website, Snopes.com.
4. On page 26 of his book, Dreams from my Father (2004, paperback edition), Obama states he found his birth certificate in with other documents in his grandparents home. If Obama was actually born in Hawaii, such undermines the need for Hawaii to produce a laser printed document only produced after 2001—the Certification of Live Birth that has appeared in pictures on the internet, that Hawaii refuses to authenticate, and that forensic experts have dubbed a forgery.
5. Obama has claimed dual citizenship at birth, American by his mother, Kenyan by his father (actually, this would be British as Kenya was a British colony at that time). Historically, "natural-born" requires two American parents. This makes Obama ineligible under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution, irrespective of the birth certificate issue. Whether a dual citizen at birth, indications are that Obama because an Indonesian citizen and remains so today.
6. African newspapers have consistently claimed that Obama is "Kenyan-born". One such article that recently surfaced is dated 2004. This means he did not have dual citizenship at birth was a British subject at birth as his mother was not of the age required to confer her citizenship to Obama.
7. Obama's paternal step-grandmother, Sarah, also claims he was born in Kenya and she was present at his birth.
8. Obama was listed, in the Soetoro/Dunham divorce papers, as dependent on Lolo Soetoro for the purposes of education. As Obama was over the age of 18 at the time, he could only be considered the legal child of Lolo Soetoro if he was legally adopted by Soetoro. Evidence points to him being adopted by Lolo Soetoro, to becoming (ca 1966) an Indonesian citizen. No evidence exists that he was ever an American or that he reclaimed American citizenship. The terminology used in the divorce papers may have been to facilitate Obama in receiving foreign student aid to attend college in the United States.
Advertisement
9. Indications are that Nancy Pelosi and other Democrat National Committee personnel knew Barack Hussein Obama was not eligible to the office of president; that the nomination of a non-American as the Democrat candidate was deliberate.
http://www.newswithviews.com/Stuter/stuter166.htm
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pope, Pelosi and U.S.

Pope, Pelosi and U.S.


In a story about why the U.S. Catholic Bishops have embraced Democratic-style universal health care, the Los Angeles Times noted that the Roman Catholic Church considers healthcare a basic human right, “a position the church has articulated since 1963, when it was included in a papal encyclical by Pope John XXIII.” Indeed, healthcare is declared a right in the “Peace on Earth” encyclical. That is also the basis of Obamacare.
The group Catholic Democrats has hailed passage of H.R. 3962, the Affordable Health Care for America Act of 2009, and notes that the only House Republican voting for it, Representative Joseph Cao of Louisiana, is a Catholic and former Jesuit seminarian. “The Catholic Church has been at the forefront of advocating for health care as a right for decades, including pastoral letters issued by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB) in 1981 and 1993,” the group
notes.
The evidence indicates that the Bishops—and the Vatican itself—are calling the shots behind the scene. In fact, as many media organizations are now reporting, they engineered the “compromise” that deleted abortion funding so the bill could pass the House. The Los Angeles Times
reported that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a Catholic, not only “conferred with the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops to be sure the new restrictions were acceptable” but “consulted by telephone with a cardinal in Rome.”
CNN
reported that, as a deal was being made between Pelosi and Catholic lobbyists, “Several Democrats, including Rep. Jason Altmire, D-Pennsylvania, said they are in touch with their Catholic Bishops back home. Altmire said he must have the approval of his bishop in Pittsburgh before he can vote yes.” http://www.newswithviews.com/Kincaid/cliff366.htm
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The New Berlin Wall

The New Berlin Wall


''Ultimately, this is a spiritual battle with eternal consequences and God Himself is the only One who can deliver us from what lies ahead.''

You see, as I write, the wall is being rebuilt – not with concrete, mortar or razor wire – but instead, with satellites, cameras, computers, databases and an array of impressive and oppressive technologies that can monitor, record and analyze the movements, expressions, words and even thoughts of an unsuspecting populace now evermore willing to exchange God-given liberties and freedoms for governmental guarantees of health, safety, security and prosperity.
These are the new guard towers that cast long shadows from above that to many are far more intimating than they are comforting.
But, if the government can’t protect soldiers occupying their own country’s largest military base from a single terrorist with a handgun, how can it protect you and me from enemies and threats both foreign and domestic? I don’t care what politicians promise or provide; government in any form – local, global or otherwise – is simply not a suitable substitute for Almighty God, and never will be. Trusting in government to meet all our needs in life from the cradle to the grave is at best, a misplaced faith – and at worst, idolatry.
“Thus saith the LORD; Cursed be the man that trusteth in man, and maketh flesh his arm, and whose heart departeth from the LORD.” – Jeremiah 17:5
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but the wall is indeed returning – and this time it extends around the world. When the powers that be are finished with it, there will be nowhere to run and hide. It won’t protect us from the evil without, but will only chain us electronically and spiritually to the wickedness within.
It doesn’t matter how many guns are purchased or how much ammo one has stored away. Ultimately, this is a spiritual battle with eternal consequences and God Himself is the only One who can deliver us from what lies ahead. The sooner we fall to our knees, confess our sins, repent and cry out for a salvation that comes only by Jesus Christ, the sooner we will have “the peace of God which passeth all understanding…” and the wherewithal to carry on into the future, uncertain as it may be.
http://www.newswithviews.com/PaulProctor/proctor192.htm
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The only good kind of unemployment

The only good kind of unemployment




The unemployment rate is just about to go up again.
According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, unemployment is at 10.2 percent, but may be as high 22.1 percent according to
Dr. Jerome Corsi, who exposed massive underreporting from the underemployed and those who have just given up. If only we had listened to Obama who said unemployment would rise to 8 percent without his "stimulus" package. We'd all be a lot better off.
But whether the unemployment rate is over 10 percent or over 22 percent, one thing's for sure: It's about to go even higher.
To the 220 members of Congress who voted for socialized medicine, complete with
health-care rationing and denial of life-saving services, and to the members in the Senate who are contemplating doing the same, let me give you something you're going to be needing: The "want ads":
www.Jobs.com
www.Monster.com
www.CareerBuilder.com
I'd like to say that there are many opportunities open to you in the private sector, but because of your socialized programs for which you've been voting, there may not be work for you next year when you'll be needing it most.
Go "green" and let the world know what really needs recycling in 2010 with the magnetic bumper sticker: "Recycle Congress"
But, I'm sure there'll be something fitting for you in the private sector. After all, you've been a member of Congress. I'm interested in helping you find another line of work – let's see, what would be a good job placement for you? My first thought was in retail, but that wouldn't work because, even as a clerk at McDonald's, there is a likelihood you'd be handling money – something you have shown is, well, above your pay grade.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=115554
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Hasan's motive unknown?

Hasan's motive unknown?

"We don't know all the answers yet and I would caution against jumping to conclusions until we have all the facts."
''The deaths and maiming at Fort Hood are heartbreaking and angering. But ultimately far more injurious to America than the act of evil that caused those deaths and injuries is the massive self-deception American society engages in out of fear of being called bigoted, racist or "Islamophobic." '' One reads and hears with increasing disbelief and anger that we don't know the motive or motives of Nidal Malik Hasan, the Army major who fired over 100 shots at his fellow American soldiers in order to murder and maim as many as possible. Hasan ended up allegedly murdering 13 people, but government and Army spokesmen and the mainstream media claim they just can't figure out why he did this. They are, however, certain that it was not an act of terrorism.
Sunday's New York Times "Week in Review" article about Nidal Hasan was titled "When Soldiers Snap." The gist of the article was that Maj. Hasan had snapped – even though he had never been in combat. He snapped in advance. Just two sentences in the article were devoted to the possibility that his motives were in any way relatable to his Muslim faith.
As Chris Matthews put it, "it's unclear if religion was a factor in this shooting." To Matthews, not only was it unclear if Hasan's Islamic faith was "the" factor, it was unclear if it was even "a" factor.
Likewise, on NPR, Tom Gjelten offered the novel explanation that Hasan, who has never been in combat, may have suffered from "pre-traumatic stress disorder" because he anticipated having traumatic distress. "Was he an example," Gjelten seriously asked, "of these soldiers who are literally freaked out by what they are likely to face when they are deployed?"
A jaw-dropping expose on the six-month undercover operation that revealed the true terror-supporting nature of CAIR: "Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That's Conspiring to Islamize America." It's also available in electronic form at reduced price through Scribd.
And on Fox News, Geraldo Rivera said, "I don't know what motivates him ... as far as I know ... he's a sociopath; he's a criminal. He could have had a toothache and gone off because of that."
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=115574
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What's behind America's politically correct 'love' of Islam?

What's behind America's politically correct 'love' of Islam?


''Do we dare admit what is really at play here? The truth is actually very simple. We are afraid of Islam. We are intimidated by Islam. And because we are afraid of and intimidated by Islam, Islam is changing us – in two distinct and profound ways.''The second they heard about the Fort Hood massacre, millions of thinking Americans wondered in their gut: "Oh God, is this another crazy Muslim terrorist carrying out a one-man jihad, as has happened so many times before?"
Then, when the alleged perpetrator's name and religion were made public (Nidal Malik Hasan, a lifelong Muslim) along with eyewitness reports he had
shouted the obligatory pre-terror-attack proclamation, "Allahu akbar" ("Allah is greatest") before commencing his orgy of slaughter, their suspicions were confirmed: This was surely a major attack on the American homeland by a Muslim terrorist.
Further evidence quickly rolled in: Hasan had reportedly
refused to fight fellow Muslims, called the war on terror a "war on Islam," told a co-worker Muslims had a right to rise up and attack Americans, and reportedly had posted online his astoundingly twisted belief that an Islamic suicide bomber was morally equivalent to a soldier throwing himself on a grenade to save the lives of his comrades.
In other words, although the
Army had many warnings Hasan was a certifiable, America-hating, jihadist "ticking time bomb" waiting to go off, it did nothing to avert last week's terror attack. Why?
And why, after the truth about Hasan became undeniable following his mass slaughter, does the government, as well as its mouthpiece the establishment press, agonize in their usual pathetic manner over what could possibly have motivated the Army psychiatrist to coldly, methodically murder 13 and wound 38 others?
Shortly after the attack, right on schedule, the FBI announced it wasn't terror-related.
Time magazine moronically blamed posttraumatic stress disorder – even though Hasan has never been deployed in a war zone.
The shooter's relatives insisted he had been the
victim of religious harassment because of his faith, which must have made him snap.
According to the Associated Press, the problem was that Hasan was lonely. That's right, the news giant's report, titled
"The lonely life of alleged Fort Hood shooter," was subtitled: "'He was mistreated. He didn't have nobody. He was all alone,' says neighbor."
Meanwhile, President Obama
warned Americans against "jumping to conclusions" about what might have motivated the shooter.
Why, after a Muslim commits a terrorist act, do authorities always announce almost instantaneously – before they could possibly know – that the attack was not terror-related?
Get "Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That's Conspiring to Islamize America," autographed, from WND's Superstore. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=115542
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The demon of diversity

The demon of diversity


''We had better decide what we as God-fearing, freedom-loving Americans – particularly those who claim to be followers of Jesus Christ – are willing to die for so we can stand effectively against those willing to kill for their beliefs. We should also fire every politician and military leader who won't do the same.'' "Everybody's looking for a 'why' answer, and I'll be honest with you, I don't think there's a 'why' answer. And that's probably part of the frustrating thing about being human," stated Army Chaplain Col. Frank Jackson at an "interfaith" service on Fort Hood.
With all due respect to Col. Jackson, he unwittingly illustrated precisely what the "why" is.
The Problem: A vital institution responsible for the safety and protection of the citizens of the nation incapable of making a moral judgment based on an absolute standard that left those within its ranks and within its protectorate vulnerable to predators. Who is this?
The Army – yes. The church – yes.
Army chief of staff Gen. George Casey Jr. appeared to express that the demon of diversity was of equal concern to military brass as the first order of national
security in stating, "As great a tragedy as this was – it would be a shame if our diversity became a casualty as well."
When did diversity take precedence over "protect and defend"?
I would certainly concur that prudence and restraint are appropriate, vengeance is not in order, and not all Muslims are represented in the heinous act of Army major-turned-terrorist Nidal Malik Hasan. The fact remains, however, that there is such significant evidence proving his previous links to a radical mosque, his open and consistent hostility toward this country and the theaters of action in Iraq and Iran, and erratic behavior that it can only be described as dereliction of duty by those in command above him for allowing him to remain in military service.
In addition, the "religion of peace" is inseparable from this incident regardless of how frantic our president and the pointy-headed bureaucrats in media, governmental and military circles are to deflect the truth.
A jaw-dropping expose on the six-month undercover operation that revealed the true terror-supporting nature of CAIR: "Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That's Conspiring to Islamize America." It's also available in electronic form at reduced price through Scribd.
We are again "material witnesses" to the chaos brought by religious pluralism and radical multiculturalism that functionally creates a standard of antagonism and hostility toward the "untouchable" caste religions of Judaism and Christianity. Even religious leaders and many, if not most, pastors are fearful of being branded as intolerant by preaching or speaking clear biblical standards of absolute truth.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=115558
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Evidence grows that Obama is not an American citizen

The New Berlin Wall

 

 

 

Evidence grows that Obama is not an American citizen


''Now we stand at the precipice of the totalitarian state with a man occupying the White House, usurping the Oval Office, who isn't an American; who has, by his own actions and words, declared himself a Marxist.''

Tomorrow is Veterans Day, commemorating our men and women who fought (and died) to keep this country free under the Constitution and Bill of Rights established by our Founding Fathers.
On November 4, 2008, Barack Hussein Obama was elected to the office of president of the United States. The evidence grows that Obama is not an American citizen, was not eligible to the office he holds, should never have been allowed on the ballot in any of the 50 states.
1. Not one of the Senators of Representatives in Congress has actually seen Obama's birth certificate. They have seen pictures of a document posted on the internet, but they have not seen the actual birth certificate.
2. Hawaii claims to hold a birth certificate for Obama but that does not mean Obama was born in Hawaii. At the time Obama contends he was born (1961), Hawaii (Act 96, Session Laws of 1911, Special Session of 1909 and the Organic Act) allowed for the birth registration, in Hawaii, of foreign-born children. Until the actual birth certificate is produced and examined; where Obama was actually born is unknown and unproven.
3. No Hawaiian hospital is willing to own up to Obama being born there. Meanwhile, Obama and his half-sister have claimed he was born at two different hospitals. When Obama finally decided he was born at one particular hospital, internet sites set about to "correct" their stories to reflect his unproven claims, including the left-wing website, Snopes.com.
4. On page 26 of his book, Dreams from my Father (2004, paperback edition), Obama states he found his birth certificate in with other documents in his grandparents home. If Obama was actually born in Hawaii, such undermines the need for Hawaii to produce a laser printed document only produced after 2001—the Certification of Live Birth that has appeared in pictures on the internet, that Hawaii refuses to authenticate, and that forensic experts have dubbed a forgery.
5. Obama has claimed dual citizenship at birth, American by his mother, Kenyan by his father (actually, this would be British as Kenya was a British colony at that time). Historically, "natural-born" requires two American parents. This makes Obama ineligible under Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the United States Constitution, irrespective of the birth certificate issue. Whether a dual citizen at birth, indications are that Obama because an Indonesian citizen and remains so today.
6. African newspapers have consistently claimed that Obama is "Kenyan-born". One such article that recently surfaced is dated 2004. This means he did not have dual citizenship at birth was a British subject at birth as his mother was not of the age required to confer her citizenship to Obama.
7. Obama's paternal step-grandmother, Sarah, also claims he was born in Kenya and she was present at his birth.
8. Obama was listed, in the Soetoro/Dunham divorce papers, as dependent on Lolo Soetoro for the purposes of education. As Obama was over the age of 18 at the time, he could only be considered the legal child of Lolo Soetoro if he was legally adopted by Soetoro. Evidence points to him being adopted by Lolo Soetoro, to becoming (ca 1966) an Indonesian citizen. No evidence exists that he was ever an American or that he reclaimed American citizenship. The terminology used in the divorce papers may have been to facilitate Obama in receiving foreign student aid to attend college in the United States.
Advertisement
9. Indications are that Nancy Pelosi and other Democrat National Committee personnel knew Barack Hussein Obama was not eligible to the office of president; that the nomination of a non-American as the Democrat candidate was deliberate.


 

 
Is the day of great leaders past? Eidsmoe and Dupré are 100% correct. Look at the heroes of liberal historians and who do you find? Abraham Lincoln, Woodrow Wilson, and Franklin Roosevelt. Not by accident, these same historians will extol the virtues of Hammurabi, Alexander, Julius Caesar, Charlemagne, and Napoleon. All these men have one thing in common: they were responsible for expanding (either by force or fraud) a centralized government. 


 
 
  • Happy Birthday to our beloved Marines! SEMPER FI!!...
  • Evidence Mounts That Jihad Motivated Fort Hood Sho...
  • The Newer Feminism
  • Keep up the health-care pressure
  • Evidence grows that Obama is not an American citiz...
  • Pope, Pelosi and U.S.
  • The New Berlin Wall
  • Is the day of great leaders past?
  • The only good kind of unemployment
  • Hasan's motive unknown?
  • What's behind America's politically correct 'love'...
  • The demon of diversity
  • Antennalope
  • Will of the puppets
  •  

     Happy Birthday to our brave Marines! SEMPER FI!!!OORAH!

     

     

    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Big government means big injustice

    Big government means big injustice


    “A single assembly, possessed of all the powers of government, would make arbitrary laws for their own interest, execute all laws arbitrarily for their own interest, and adjudge all controversies in their own favor.” That, in a nut shell, is the problem with the modern administrative state and why it so often tyrannical rather than just.'' One of the hallmark characteristics of contemporary big government is the expansive administrative state. Administrative agencies create laws (regulations), prosecute regulatees alleged to have transgressed the regulations (hold administrative hearings), and adjudge law violations (impose forfeitures and fines). Profound differences exist between the rule of law in courts and that in administrative agencies. Congress’s investiture of legislative, executive, and judicial powers in single administrative agencies has caused a progressive transformation of law from defense of individual rights to violation of them and from decentralization of power with tolerance for liberty to centralization of power with intolerance for liberty. Thus, as the administrative state grows, so grows injustice. The changes spell the end of substantive rights protection for many industrious Americans.
    Under the system envisioned by our founding fathers, courts adjudicate disputes with a significant degree of independence from those who bring and defend charges. An independent judiciary does not create the law when operating in accordance with the separation of powers doctrine, constitutional precedent, and the canons of construction. It does not enforce the law beyond issuance of an order. An administrative agency, by contrast, is far more efficient and draconian. It is a one stop shop—law maker, law prosecutor, and law adjudicator. There is no true separation of powers. There is no keen interest in respecting constitutional precedent (indeed, in several instances I have heard administrative law judges tell me that they have no power to declare whether an agency regulation or the application of it violates the Constitution and, thus, they leave constitutional challenges unaddressed).
    http://www.newswithviews.com/Emord/jonathan105.htm
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    The people aren't buying it, Obama

    The people aren't buying it, Obama


    ''People are not buying the media spin, and they are rejecting the propaganda. More people are getting off their sofas and getting informed, involved and engaged in fighting against how the liberals in Washington are trying to change this country with propaganda and ineffective policy.'' There's an old saying about a glass being half empty or half full. The optimist will view it as half full, while the pessimist will say it is half empty.
    But when the glass is nearly empty and it's called "nearly full," or a big success, that's pure political propaganda. The danger with political propaganda is that it borders on just plain lies, exaggerations or intended deceptions.
    President Obama and the Democrats told the public in February that they needed to pass the $787 billion stimulus bill to keep the unemployment rate under 8 percent. The rate has increased in an almost vertical fashion every month since then, and the Labor Department reported Friday that October's rate hit 10.2 percent.
    President Obama's response to the report was, "I will not rest until all Americans who want work can find work." With all due respect, Mr. President, you will not get any rest for a long time because spending and
    debt do not create jobs.
    I know it's a long shot, and your people may not show it to you, but I suggested a
    plan that would make you look like an economic hero.
    President Obama also said he would not sign a health-care bill that adds one dime to the deficit. In order for the House Democrats to pretend to get to "not one dime," they low-balled the cost at $894 billion by shifting some items elsewhere, disguising the
    tax increases and assuming unrealistic cuts in Medicare. The real cost is $1.5 trillion at least, and no government social program
    in history has ever hit "at least."
    Speaker Pelosi recently echoed President Obama's remark that "health-care reform is entitlement reform, which is essential to lowering the deficit." Wow! Really!
    They are proposing to spend $1.5 trillion over 10 years on a new social program that looks like Medicare's ugly twin sister, containing more than 50 new layers of bureaucracy, and somehow it is going to magically reform Medicare, Medicaid and
    Social Security and reduce the deficit at the same time. Right! And I can fly. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=115392
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Rampage at Fort Hood is a domestic terrorist attack

    Rampage at Fort Hood is a domestic terrorist attack


    ''The one question that keeps coming to my mind is: Have we become so tolerant and politically correct that we can't see or confront a rotten apple when it's right in front of our eyes?'' Last Thursday, Nov. 5, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, an Army psychiatrist and devout Muslim, fatally shot 13 U.S. American citizens (12 service men and women) and wounded an additional 30 people at the largest U.S. military installation, Fort Hood, Texas. Faizul Khan, a former imam who attended services at the same mosque with Hasan for 10 years in Silver Spring, Md., described him as "very serious about his religion" and wanting an equally religious woman "who prayed five times a day and wears a hijab."
    Hasan
    vehemently opposed the U.S. missions in the Middle East, arguing with co-workers, senior officers and even patients. He quarreled with Col. Terry Lee, who testified that Hasan "said maybe the Muslims should stand up and fight against the aggressor." Dr. Val Finnell, a former classmate, said that Hasan was "very vocal" about equating the war on terror with a war on Islam. He said Hasan even gave a PowerPoint presentation once justifying Islamic suicide bombing.
    A few days before Hasan's killing spree at Fort Hood, he proved his premeditated intentions by giving away all his belongings (including his Qurans) to his neighbors, saying he would no longer need them and adding "
    I'm ready."
    Just hours before the shooting spree, he attended prayer services at a local mosque, where he normally wore street clothes but that morning
    wore white Muslim attire.
    Firsthand witnesses at the Fort Hood murder scene heard Hasan yelling, "
    Allahu akbar" (meaning "God is great") before he opened fire killing 13 and wounding 30 more.
    For six months, authorities had been tracking the extremist thinking of Hasan. Internet postings like
    this one go back to May 20, 2009 (spelling as in original):
    There was a grenade thrown amongs a group of American soldiers. One of the soldiers, feeling that it was to late for everyone to flee jumped on the grave with the intention of saving his comrades. Indeed he saved them. He inentionally took his life (suicide) for a noble cause i.e. saving the lives of his soldier. To say that this soldier committed suicide is inappropriate. Its more appropriate to say he is a brave hero that sacrificed his life for a more noble cause. Scholars have paralled this to suicide bombers whose intention, by sacrificing their lives, is to help save Muslims by killing enemy soldiers. If one suicide bomber can kill 100 enemy soldiers because they were caught off guard that would be considered a strategic victory. Their intention is not to die because of some despair. The same can be said for the Kamikazees in Japan. They died (via crashing their planes into ships) to kill the enemies for the homeland. You can call them crazy i you want but their act was not one of suicide that is despised by Islam. So the scholars main point is that 'IT SEEMS AS THOUGH YOUR INTENTION IS THE MAIN ISSUE' and Allah (SWT) knows best. (Note: An interesting resource next to Hasan's posting is for the resource "Martyrdom in Islam Versus Suicide Bombing.")
    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=115389
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    The 'Muslim Thing' hard at work

    The 'Muslim Thing' hard at work


    ''You and I know what Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan is. He's a terrorist. Why won't the media come clean? Why are they dancing around the obvious? Why were they so unwilling even to tell us his name? Why were they so quick to rule out even the possibility of the Fort Hood attack being terrorism-related when almost every American knew what it was from the beginning?''

    Are you sick to your stomach about the way the media have soft-pedaled the latest Islamic terrorist attack at Fort Hood?
    Do you share my disbelief at the way the press has gone out of its way to portray this slaughter as something other than what it clearly is?
    Do you plan to share your revulsion with members of the media who have attempted to bury coverage of the shocking findings of the new book, "
    Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That's Conspiring to Islamize America," at the very moment this book needs maximum attention if we are to protect our country from future attacks?
    Far from being a setback to the organized front groups for jihadism, the massacre at Fort Hood has been a public relations boon to them.
    While the courageous American authors of this book have been systematically shut out of mainstream media coverage, the stealth jihadists who pose as Muslim civil rights proponents have had a press field day warning against phantom retribution against innocent Muslims.
    Hey guys! This is America. Not one Arab-American, not one Muslim-American has been attacked in response to the wholesale slaughter at Fort Hood. I'm an Arab-American, and I don't have any fear that my neighbors are going to hunt me down because of what happened at Fort Hood. I do, however, fear that I may be a victim of a terrorist attack. And I know I will face retribution in some form for publishing "
    Muslim Mafia."
    Do you want to be outraged?
    Check out this videotape of radical Muslims condoning the slaughter at Fort Hood.
    This is happening in the streets of America. No arrests. No condemnation. No attacks.
    I'm not even aware of any temporary restraining orders being filed against these creeps.
    All I can say is they are very lucky this Arab-American wasn't walking down that street when they pulled this stunt!
    Why aren't we seeing this on Fox News?
    Why aren't we seeing this on CNN?
    Why aren't we seeing this on MSLSD?
    Why is it that all we see are the front group spokesmen – even those that are part of an unindicted terrorist co-conspirator?
    I've just about had it.
    I don't know what is happening to this country.
    Have we gone insane?
    What must occur before we awaken to the threat posed by the Saudi-sponsored Muslim Brotherhood terrorist front groups operating with impunity inside America?
    http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=115386
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
    « Previous12345678910567568Next »