About Me

Name: Miguel Diocuore...
Email: mikecorthell@roadrunner.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

A glorious day

A glorious day


''It was a glorious day because it revealed the lack of mettle the administration has; it revealed the extent of their paternalism and arrogance where the establishment press is concerned; and gave the latter pause that is tantamount to a loss of political currency for Obama.''

Friday, Oct. 23, 2009, was a glorious day. On that day it was reported that the Obama administration had failed in a significant effort in the area of the autocratic tactics it has employed since Barack Obama took office, and far more increasingly in recent weeks.
I am speaking of the administration's attempt to maneuver establishment news organizations into segregating the Fox News
network
from the press corps. On Thursday of last week, the administration planned to allow members of the White House press pool to conduct interviews with "pay czar" Kenneth Feinberg. The pool is a group of five rotating network news organizations that is ostensibly representative of the press at large, and traditionally has shared the expense and function of covering the president.
The White House's intention was that all members of the White
House press pool would be allowed to participate in the interviews with Feinberg – all, that is, except for Fox News.
As the reader may be aware, the Obama administration has been waging what can only be considered a one-sided (albeit vigorous) war of words against Fox. On Oct. 18, White
House senior adviser David Axelrod said (on ABC News' "This Week" program) that Fox News is not a real news organization, and that other news networks ought not treat it as such. A broad hint, to be sure, if not a threat; on the same day, White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel made similar remarks during his appearance on CNN's "State of the Union" news show.
But, despite the establishment press' heretofore slavish devotion to Obama, the tactic backfired. The bureau chiefs of the pool networks asserted that none of their reporters would participate (in the interviews with Feinberg) unless Fox News was allowed to do so.
Discover the truth about the intimidation tactics used by today's White House in Whistleblower magazine's "MOB RULE: Under Obama, Chicago-style bullying and intimidation go nationwide"
And the administration gave in.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=114314
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Fight the 'Muslim Mafia' media blackout

Fight the 'Muslim Mafia' media blackout


''Now, let me ask you a question: Have you read any of this elsewhere? Have you heard any of this discussed on major talk-radio shows? Have you seen any of this reported on network, cable or local television?''

You may have missed this.
Unless you are an avid WND reader, you almost certainly have.
As a result of a daring undercover operation lasting six months, a Muslim Brotherhood front group – one already identified by the U.S. Justice Department as an unindicted terrorist co-conspirator – has been revealed as an active front for jihadist activity.
This group, the Council on American Islamic Relations, still sports a 501(c)3 tax-exemption from the Internal Revenue Service. It still has broad access to the "mainstream" media. And it boasts about lobbying the Congress of the United States, though such activities are strictly limited by its tax-exempt status.
Despite the following well-documented findings of this undercover investigation in which thousands of incriminating internal documents were collected, not one major news agency besides WND has picked up the voluminous stories revealed in
"Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That's Conspiring to Islamize America":
CAIR is trying to spring from prison a former headquarters official who trained for jihad with the same Pakistani terrorist group that last year massacred more than 150 people in Mumbai, India.
CAIR officials are secretly coaching terrorism suspects and witnesses to withhold information from FBI investigators and have successfully obstructed at least one investigation in Maryland.
CAIR is donating thousands of dollars to the legal defense fund of a Muslim cop killer.
CAIR's visitor logs show the father of an al-Qaida terrorist visited CAIR director Nihad Awad several months before he was convicted of plotting to assassinate President Bush.
Curiously, the logs do not register any guests around Sept. 11, 2001 – in fact, the entire month of September is blank.
CAIR has cultivated Muslim moles inside a Washington-area law enforcement agency, including one who illegally accessed FBI records to tip off a terrorist under investigation and another with ties to Pakistani intelligence.
A long-time CAIR advisory board member and top fundraiser has preached violent insurrection, including calling on street gangs to lead an "Uzi" jihad in America's cities.
Another imam whom CAIR frequently books to speak at its events has exhorted Muslims to hijack U.S. military aircraft, including C-130s transporting the elite 82nd Airborne paratroopers out of Fort Bragg – which happens to be part of the district represented by North Carolina state Sen. Larry Shaw, who this year took over the reins of CAIR as its new chairman.
CAIR is putting books into neighborhood libraries across the country advising men to beat their wives – but only "lightly" – when they disobey them.
CAIR is lobbying the Justice Department and local law enforcement to exempt Muslim wife-beaters from laws against domestic violence or at least look the other way and let Muslim clerics intervene when Muslims are involved in spousal battery cases – not unlike the one involving the prominent Muslim TV executive who ended up beheading his wife after serial domestic abuse.
CAIR's library package includes a guide to Islam edited by a radical Muslim cleric who cheered the tragic space shuttle Columbia disaster as a "good omen" for Islam and is now behind bars for inciting anti-U.S. warfare.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=114296
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Invent a new one premised on all the bad ideas?

Invent a new one premised on all the bad ideas?


''As the kids say: Duh.''

The Democrats' all-new "opt out" idea for health-care reform is the latest fig leaf for a total government takeover of the health-care system.
Democrats tell us they've been trying to nationalize health care for 65 years, but the first anyone heard of the "opt out" provision was about a week ago. They keep changing the language so people can't figure out what's going on.
The most important fact about the "opt out" scheme allegedly allowing states to decline government health insurance is that a state can't "opt out" of paying for it. All 50 states will pay for it. A state legislature can only opt out of allowing its own citizens to receive the benefits of a federal program they're paying for.
It's like a movie theater offering a "money back guarantee" and then explaining, you don't get your money back, but you don't have to stay and watch the movie if you don't like it. That's not what most people are thinking when they hear the words "opt out." The term more likely to come to mind is "scam."
While congressional Democrats act indignant that Republicans would intransigently oppose a national
health care plan that now magnanimously allows states to "opt out," other liberals are being cockily honest about the "opt out" scheme.
It's not too late to rescue the nation! Read how in "Save America Now! The New Revolution to Save Freedom and Liberty"
On the Huffington Post, the first sentence of the article on the opt-out plan is: "The public option lives."
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=114319
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Monsters among us

Monsters among us


''It's very fashionable in some "tough on crime" circles to agitate for forced chemical castration of sex-offenders, as if the way to make our children safe from societal predators is simply to deny them access to the biological equipment necessary to commit crime. The fact is, nothing less than a cordless drill to the brain – to let the evil spirits out, let's say – will truly remove from a murderous child molester the urge to victimize little boys and little girls.''

Her name is Somer Thompson. She was 7 years old. She's dead.
In her last minutes of life, this beautiful little girl suffered inhuman acts of brutality. She was taken and murdered by one of the monsters who live and work among us – one of the pieces of human debris, the living mounds of filth, who are allowed to breathe the same air, live in the same apartment buildings and work the same jobs as genuine human beings. They look like us, but they're not human at all; they're animals who walk on two legs, with hearts full of black emptiness and minds full of perversion and violence.
Somer Thompson disappeared a week ago last Monday. She left school to walk home and was never seen alive again. By Wednesday of last week,
ABC News was reporting that the density of registered sex offenders living within walking distance of Somer's home is so great that "when their homes are represented by pins on a digital map they create a cluster so thick it overlaps in places." On Thursday, searchers found Somer's body in a Georgia landfill. By Friday, authorities had interrogated and ruled out as suspects all 161 sex offenders living in a five-mile radius of the house that will never again feel like a home to Somer Thompson's parents.
Let me write that out: There are ONE HUNDRED SIXTY-ONE sex offenders living within five miles of this little girl's house. What's more, that density of legally registered perverts, child molesters, rapists, flashers and whatever else, is considered average. ABC quoted a Florida lawyer named Ron Book, a legal activist who fights for stricter sex-offense laws. "In spite of appearing ... to be a lot, that's about average. Some areas have hundreds of offenders."
Thanks to the miracle of technology, many new parents now experience the dubious honor of a new rite of passage in our society. When they are pregnant or shortly after their children are born, they visit various websites online that inform them of exactly where and who are the sex offenders in their neighborhoods. You, too, can obtain a map of these unctuous, contemptible creatures in your own neighborhood.
DVD shows how "the father of the sexual revolution" has endangered our children and our culture – "The Kinsey Syndrome"
Just browse to
familywatchdog.us, enter your address, and prepare to be horrified. You'll get a scattering Christmas-tree pattern of colored squares overlaid on a map of your target address. Clicking these squares will give you pictures, names, work addresses – complete dossiers, really – of the monsters lurking among you. There are other sites, too, such as your state's offender registry, that you can check. For example, I'm a New Yorker. My state lists sex offenders by county and risk level and allows you to search that registry by name and location. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=114301
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama signs 'hate-crimes' bill into law

Obama signs 'hate-crimes' bill into law


'It's a very sad day for America and for religious liberties'

A "hate crimes" bill opponents claim will be used to crack down on Christian speech, even the reading of the Bible, was signed into law today by President Obama.
The Senate approved the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act by a vote of 68-29 on Oct. 22 after Democrats strategically attached it to a "must-pass" $680 billion defense appropriations plan.
Most Republicans, although normally strong supporters of the U.S. military, opposed the bill because it hands out federal money to states and local governments in pursuit of "preventing" hate crimes. The bill creates federal protections and privileges for homosexuals and other alternative lifestyles but denies those protections to other groups of citizens.
Obama signed the 2010 National Defense Authorization Act at a White House ceremony today. Prior to signing the act into law, Obama spoke briefly of the hate crimes bill.
"After more than a decade, we've passed inclusive hate-crimes legislation to help protect our citizens from violence based on what they look like, who they love, how they pray or who they are," he said. "I promised Judy Shepard when she saw me in the Oval Office that this day would come, and I'm glad that she and her husband, Dennis, could join us for this event. I'm also honored to have the family of the late Sen. Ted Kennedy who fought so hard for this legislation. I just want you all to know how proud we are of the work that Ted did to help make this day possible."
American Family Association President Tim Wildmon warned that the new law "creates a kind of caste system in law enforcement, where the perverse thing is that people who engage in non-normative sexual behavior will have more legal protection than heterosexuals. This kind of inequality before the law is simply un-American."
Wildmon said the legislation creates possible situations where pastors may be arrested if their sermons on sexuality can be linked in even the remotest way to acts of violence.
"It threatens free speech and freedom of religion and is totally unacceptable," he said.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=114305
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Companies get even 'gayer' as U.S. economy decays

Companies get even 'gayer' as U.S. economy decays


Firms with pro-homosexual policies continue steady increase in number
Despite an economy languishing in high unemployment and low consumer confidence, more American companies are jumping on the bandwagon to provide support for homosexual and transgender employees.
More than 300 firms have now received perfect 100 percent scores in this fall's
Corporate Equality Index, produced annually by the Human Rights Campaign which ranks businesses on their "treatment" of employees who have chosen homosexual, lesbian, bisexual and transgender lifestyles
.
The list, which saw a 20 percent increase this year in the number of perfect scores, includes newcomers such as theater giant
AMC Entertainment, Costco, Delta Air Lines, Food Lion and General Mills.
"Even in the most challenging economy, leading
employers are forging ahead of federal and state law to recruit and retain a diverse workforce – regardless of employees' sexual orientation and gender identity or expression," said Joe Solmonese, president of the HRC. "While Congress considers a federal law that prohibits workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity or expression, businesses can take immediate steps to ensure all employees in their workforce are treated fairly today."
Yes, you're being brainwashed to think the homosexual lifestyle is a perfectly decent way of life. Find out how in "The Marketing of Evil" for just $4.95 today only!
Many companies, such as financial leader Morgan Stanley, are thrilled with their top ranking and use it as a public-relations tool. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=114315

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Confirmed: Skin cream contains fetal proteins

Confirmed: Skin cream contains fetal proteins


Company's anti-aging products built on cells harvested from aborted baby.

"There is absolutely no reason to use aborted babies for such selfish motives," Vinnedge said. "It is anti-life, anti-woman and counter-productive, as Neocutis is about to find out!"


A pro-life organization is blasting a Switzerland-based cosmetics manufacturer whose website openly admits some of its products were developed from the tissues of an aborted baby.
Children of God for Life is a non-profit organization focused on the bioethics of embryonic tissue use in medicine and manufacturing. One of its current campaigns includes petitioning pharmaceutical companies
to produce safe, effective alternatives to vaccines derived or cultivated from aborted fetal tissue.
But the organization's attention has now turned Neocutis, a company with offices in San Francisco which has developed a line of anti-
aging products that include an ingredient the company has trademarked as Processed Skin Cell Protein, or PSP, developed from skin cells harvested from an abortion.
"It is absolutely deplorable that Neocutis would
resort to exploiting the remains of a deliberately slaughtered baby for nothing other than pure vanity and financial gain," said Debi Vinnedge, executive director of Children of God for Life, in a statement. "There is simply no moral justification for this."
The website for Neocutis, which is privately held with estimated annual sales of in excess of $2 million, explains that its research began years ago, when scientists discovered fetal skin's unusual ability to heal without scarring. Scientists at the University Hospital of Lausanne, Switzerland, then created a process to extract proteins from fetal cells in the attempt to obtain an optimal, naturally balanced mixture of nutrients.
The scientists then infused those nutrients into a line of cosmeceutical anti-aging products: Neocutis skin cream, Journée day cream, Lumière eye cream and Bio-Gel bio-restorative hydrogel – products Vinnedge is advising women to throw in the garbage before
contacting Neocutis to voice their concerns. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=114251
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Good God...They're Back!

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Monsters among us

Hey, all you fuzzy socialists!

  

Personal responsibility and personal accountability


''Before 1960, Americans enjoyed a high degree of personal responsibility and personal accountability. Most graduated from high school and could read, write and work mathematical equations. No matter how poor or how illiterate, Americans worked to put food on the table. But after Lyndon Baines Johnson’s “Great Society” erupted with free food, free housing, free medical, food stamps and a host of ‘get something for nothing’, American culture for minorities changed and then, it changed for whites in America, too.''

Following up the two part series on “U.S. Filling Up with Dumb People”, an amazing number of emails arrived with a sense of heart break, distress and futility. Older Americans seem to think that America can return to the way it was! Younger Americans don’t have a clue as to the way it used to be! Immigrant Americans don’t know what America once was nor do they care about what we are becoming. They don’t know the difference.
Immigrants celebrate being here rather than being where they came from because where they came from can only be described as miserable enough to flee. Please be advised that over 10 million people wait in line to move to America and their numbers grow by 77 million annually. But as more and more of them arrive, they turn our country into the same chaos they left in their countries. Example: California!
As we change our language to many languages, as we change our ethnic makeup to a majority of Mexican-Americans and Muslim-Americans by 2042, (Source: PEW Research) as we change our dominant Christian religion that built this country—into a multicultural morass, as we lower our standards in education, culture and personal accountability—America will never again enjoy its exceptional past.
This quote bears repeating as it applies to America. In Dr. Otis Graham’s “Unguarded Gates: A History of America’s Immigration Crisis”, he writes, “Most Western elites continue urging the wealthy West not to stem the migrant tide, but to absorb our global brothers and sisters until their horrid ordeal has been endured and shared by all--ten billion humans packed onto an ecologically devastated planet.”

 

Invent a new one premised
on all the bad ideas?


 
   

 

 

   Monsters among us 
Her name is Somer
Thompson. She was 7 years
old. She's dead. In her
last minutes of life,
this beautiful little
girl suffered inhuman
acts of brutality.

 

 

Ask the Editor

  • Scare a lib for Halloween
  • Holy Teat, ACORN is Back!
  • Personal responsibility and personal accountabilit...
  • Hey, all you fuzzy socialists!
  • Exit an era, welcome a new
  • A glorious day
  • Fight the 'Muslim Mafia' media blackout
  • Invent a new one premised on all the bad ideas?
  • Monsters among us
  • Obama signs 'hate-crimes' bill into law
  • Companies get even 'gayer' as U.S. economy decays
  • Confirmed: Skin cream contains fetal proteins
  • Which end up Obama?
  • Injection or the chair?
  • Is Obama a prisoner of the U.S. military?
  •  

     

     

    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Is Glenn Becking confusing?

    Is Glenn Becking confusing?


    ''Please, Glenn, stop the satire. You’re confusing me and explain why I shouldn’t be questioning your support for such leftist journalists like Murrow and Cronkite?''
    I was cruising the radio dial one day and I ran into this guy called Glenn Beck and his assistant, Stu who had been given an assignment to follow presidential candidate Barack Obama around and report back to Glenn. The dialogue taking place this particular day found Stu following B.O. into the bathroom. He noticed him going into the stall, sitting down and “Wow,” absolutely euphoric Stu said, “This guy doesn’t even leave a stink.” I told my husband about it later and said maybe I should write an article. My wise husband of 54 years said it sounded like satire to him and Glenn Beck sounded like a jokester. Taking his wise counsel, I decided maybe I’d better not go out on a limb; however, after that encounter I became a regular radio listener and I, too, became impressed with Glenn Beck on the radio and when he was hired by FOX, I became a regular listener like so many of his followers and he’s to be commended for his leadership with the widely successful Tea Party and 9/12 movements. People are waking up. I bought about a dozen Common Sense books and gave them away.
    However, some of my long-time astute networking research friends suggested I be “beware” of Beck and then about a month ago he praised Edward R. Murrow as being a terrific journalist for “exposing” Senator Joe McCarthy (R-Wisconsin) when McCarthy began accusing many in our government as being either communist sympathizers or outright communists. McCarthy died under suspicious circumstances at a government hospital in 1957 and many books and articles since have been written saying “McCarthy was right.” I talked to several other older friends from the McCarthy/Murrow era that love Glenn and his remark about Murrow went right over their heads. So, I wonder, how many other heads did it go over? Did I hear wrong? Certainly his remark wasn’t some sort of sick satire, or was it?
    ttp://www.newswithviews.com/Betty/Freauf150.htm
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    What the hell happened to liberalism?

    What the hell happened to liberalism?


    ''Modern liberalism is now impoverished by its own simplicity. Government is always the solution, and individualism is always the problem. As President Obama so succinctly put it in 2008, "our individual salvation depends on collective salvation." Steinbeck's liberalism put it differently: "It believe that man is a double thing – a group animal and at the same time an individual. And it occurs to me that he cannot successfully be the second until he has fulfilled the first."

    On Tuesday, Oct. 26, 2009, Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., appeared opposite Ralph Nader on "The Ed Schultz Show." When Nader questioned Frank's far-left bona fides, Frank quickly responded, "We are trying on every front to increase the role of government."
    This is what today's liberal movement has become. Stripped to its essentials, modern liberalism is now a nakedly ambitious power grab by corrupt officials, their union allies and faux-victimized purloiners of the taxpayer till. Its underlying premises – the ultimate goodness of government, the ultimate evil of the American population – are plainly inconsistent with the foundations of constitutional philosophy.
    It was not always thus. Over the weekend, I had a chance to re-read one of my favorite authors, John Steinbeck. Steinbeck was considered for decades the leading authorial spokesman for the blue-collar left. "The Grapes of Wrath," his most famous work, is undoubtedly a liberal tract – it condemns the harshness of unbridled capitalism and asks (literally) for the milk of human kindness.
    Whereas today's liberal spokespeople have been infected by a virulent anti-Americanism that sees all businessmen as profiteers and all public workers as saints, Steinbeck was a patriot. He worried about the lack of kindness he saw in his fellow men, particularly the willingness to cut corners to make a buck – but at the same time, he saw the virtue of freedom.
    In 1960, Steinbeck wrote a piece in Newsday magazine in which he explained his view of morality. "[It's] very clear that peoples are strong when they are moral in the sense that the good of the group or the nation takes precedence over the selfish good of the individual. And we know from many examples of the past that when this is reversed and the individual raids the public good for his own purposes, the
    laws of decay have set in." In short, a nation comprised of a group of individuals governed by a common morality is stronger than an agglomeration of atomistic individuals acting solely for their own benefit.
    Steinbeck's brand of liberalism made political debate a real possibility. After all, conservatives agree that men are neither angels nor devils, and that not everyone will behave with the same honor as an Ayn Rand-ian hero. Steinbeck's solution to the problem of "immorality" was not necessarily more government, but better men in government, and not necessarily more regulation, but more self-regulation. Communal standards were important, but there was no guarantee that government would be the best
    judge of communal standards. As Steinbeck wrote shortly before his death, "It is our national conviction that politics is a dirty, tricky and dishonest pursuit and that all politicians are crooks. The reason for this attitude is fairly obvious – we have had cynical and dishonest officials on all levels of our government." http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=114275
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    of the people, by the people

    Self-governance works


    ''Don't mistake the association for government. Rather, it is a private co-op designed for a narrow purpose. "All of the Swiss institutions used to govern commonly owned alpine meadows have one obvious similarity – the appropriators themselves make all the major decisions about the use of the CPR."

    Much of what government does is based on the premise that people can't do things for themselves, so government must do it for them. More often than not, the result is a ham-handed, bumbling, one-size-fits-all approach that leaves the intended beneficiaries worse off. Of course, this resulting failure is never blamed on the political approach – on the contrary, failure is taken to mean the government solution was not extravagant enough.
    We who have confidence in what free people can achieve have long believed that government should not venture beyond its narrow sphere of providing physical
    security
    . It should not attempt to cure every social ill. So it's good to learn that serious scholars have demonstrated that our intuitions are right. Free people, given the chance, solve what many "experts" think are problems that require state intervention.
    For that reason, Elinor Ostrom's winning of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences ought to kindle a new interest in freedom. (
    See my earlier column, "A Nobel winner who showed freedom works.")
    Ostrom made her mark through field studies that show people solving one of the more vexing problems: efficient management of a common-pool
    resource (CPR), such as a pasture or fishery. With an unowned "commons," each individual has an incentive to get the most out of it without putting anything back.
    What would it look like if the federal behemoth were severely cut down to size? Read Wayne Allen Root's prescription for the nation in "The Conscience of a Libertarian: Empowering the Citizen Revolution with God, Guns, Gambling & Tax Cuts"
    If I take fish from a common fishing area, I benefit completely from those fish. But if I make an investment to increase the future number of fish, others benefit, too. So why should I risk making the investment? I'll wait for others to do it. But everyone else faces the same free-rider incentive. So we end up with a depleted resource and what Garrett Harden called
    "the tragedy of the commons."
    Except, says Ostrom, we often don't. There is also an "opportunity of the commons." While most politicians conclude that, depending on the resource, efficient management requires either privatization or government ownership, Ostrom finds examples of a third way: "self-
    organizing forms of collective action," as she put it in an interview a few years ago. Her message is to be wary of government promises. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=114258
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Understanding the New World Order

    Understanding the New World Order


    ''The new world will come from another world''
    ''To begin to understand the New World Order (NWO) or the WORMS you need to forget what you have learned about differences between Republicans and Democrats; left and right; Socialists and Libertarians: business and labor, liberal and conservative...''

    What is the New World Order? How does it affect you?
    The essence of the New World Order or WORld Management System (WORMS) is that it is management by social engineers, rather than government based on a written constitution. How you are affected by this management system, depends on what the social engineers decide the system should do for you and require of you. The social engineers and system managers think of themselves as scientists applying the scientific method to the control of group behavior. Your behavior and relationships are regarded as subjects of investigation and control by those who call themselves ‘social scientists.’ You are among their test animals, and you have no say in, and often no knowledge of experiments that involve you.
    There is nothing new about the idea of managing others, or even of controlling the whole world. That has been the goal of social philosophers for thousands of years. However, we need not go back over ancient history. We are concerned primarily with what has been going on in our own generations. This we can understand quite well if we confine ourselves to the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries.
    Goals of the New World Order
    To begin to understand the New World Order (NWO) or the WORMS you need to forget what you have learned about differences between Republicans and Democrats; left and right; Socialists and Libertarians: business and labor, liberal and conservative, black and white, etc. The planners of the New World Order know they must use, influence, and cater to all of these groups to accomplish the goals they are seeking, which are:
    (1) Claim everything.(2) Classify everything.(3) Commercialize everything.(4) Consolidate everything.(5) Control everything.
    We might call these goals the five C’s of the World Management System. If it is fully empowered, individualism, personality, personal decisions, personal goals, private property, private business, morality, Constitutional government, religious freedom, and national sovereignty can no longer be tolerated. Everyone must be subject to the management system. To quote Auguste Comte, one of the most significant early planners of the world management system,
    "The only real life is the collective life of the race; individual life has no existence except as an abstraction."
    [1] http://www.newswithviews.com/Erica/Carle161.htm
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    New Think-New America-No America

    New Think-New America-No America


    ''These days we have conservative talk radio, Fox News, and alternatives to the “mainstream” media on the Internet. It is obvious that the Obama Administration and its progressive backers don’t appreciate this new state of affairs.''


    ''Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances''.— The First Amendment to the United States Constitution
    You may not have noticed that the Obama Administration, in addition to trying to seize control of the health care and energy sectors, is implementing a national “broadband plan” to redefine the media and transform America’s system of government. It’s designed, they say, to provide “open government and civic engagement.” But it looks increasingly like an excuse for the federal government to control the Internet and access to information and even tell us what is truth.
    Norman Ornstein of the American Enterprise Institute recently explained at a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) “National Broadband Plan Workshop” that it is necessary to have “a common space with shared facts.” Armed with $7.2 billion of “stimulus” money, the federal government is going to provide this. It looks like various progressive groups are lining up at the public trough for their share of the loot. They have in mind what the George Soros-funded Free Press calls “an alternative media infrastructure.”
    If you think we already have that, with public TV and radio, think again. The Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which has received $8 billion in federal tax dollars since it was created in 1967, is not considered radical enough by these folks. The Free Press favors an additional $50 billion “Public Media Trust fund” financed by a tax on home electronic devices. It also wants the federally-funded AmeriCorps to finance jobs for journalists.
    A new national broadband plan, combined with the just-announced FCC plan for “net neutrality,” or regulating access to the Internet, provides the opportunity for the federal government to define a “new public square” with a “common space with shared facts,” as Ornstein put it at the August 6 FCC event. He explained, “It’s something that was easier when we had three broadcast channels and virtually everybody in the society tuned into them.”
    Those were the days, you may remember, when Walter Cronkite claimed “That’s the way it is,” and many people believed him. We know better now. But Ornstein seems to be pining for the “good old days” when Cronkite and other liberals dominated the dissemination of news and information.
    http://www.newswithviews.com/Kincaid/cliff362.htm
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Might preborns become a trendy cause?

    Might preborns become a trendy cause?


    ''We may be entering a time when liberal celebrities and liberals online are particularly sensitive to human-rights issues – to helpless people, to victims. I also think it is quite compelling to them that pro-lifers now outnumber pro-aborts in America. Put those together and pro-lifers may soon find the time ripe to engage those across the ideological divide to take a second look at the most helpless victims among us, preborn humans.''

    "Causes are the new black," quipped the moderator as he introduced actor Anthony Edwards, first up on a celebrity panel discussing how social media has impacted the lives of pop stars.
    This was at the Blog World and New Media Expo in Las Vegas 10 days ago.
    Edwards' cause is funding the
    construction of what will be the largest children's hospital in Kenya, via his organization Shoe4Africa.
    My ears perked up at the moderator's observation, because I'd noticed this recurring theme the previous two days during BWE panels and keynotes.
    My husband and I had registered to attend BWE along with about 1,000 other bloggers.
    We knew we'd be entering liberal land, with such sessions offered as, "Blogging for change: How to influence
    health care through blogging." But we were putting up with a little left ideology to get valuable New Media tips, because they're progressive on that front, too.
    This wasn't the first time I'd entered their world, having been one of only two conservatives blogging at the Democrat National
    Convention in Denver last year.
    But since I don't read them much, I was unaware liberal bloggers become grumbling, self-centered navel gazers when not talking politics.
    At least that's what Day One keynote
    speaker Chris Brogan seemed to say. Brogan is author of the New York Times best-seller "Trust Agents: Using the Web to Build Influence, Improve Reputation, and Earn Trust."
    Brogan wore jeans and a plaid CPO, which I think he may have slept in. And he swore quite a bit, even though he said at the beginning of his speech he didn't like speakers who swore.
    But the thrust of Brogan's speech was intriguing. He called on bloggers to quit whining ("When I meet a blogger, I say, 'Oh, and what do you complain about?'"), and to start using their forums for the world's good, like
    writing about homeless people. He recapped on his blog:
    I'm issuing a call to arms, a call to action. If you're still on the fence, get in the game. What can YOU do to help others? What will YOU do with all this stuff you've learned? Help me by going out and finding the people around you who could use your help. Share what you know with each other.
    Another speaker, Linda Fitton, co-author of the book
    "Twitter for Dummies," told of raising $25,000 on Twitter to build wells in Africa.
    Fitton recommended a Web article by Tony Hsieh, the young CEO of Zappos,
    "How Twitter can make you a better (and happier) person," which includes "helping others." http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=114252
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive