About Me

Name: Corthell
Email: mikecorthell@roadrunner.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Iran: Secret Death

Iran: Secret Death


''Statements by Iranian judges serve to highlight the growing tendency towards violent punishments. A few days ago, Ebrahim Raisi, Iran's deputy judiciary chief praised the recent amputation of a thief's hand as a “divine punishment” and “source of pride.”''

Reports of secret hangings and mass executions in Iranian prisons raised concerns among human rights groups about undeclared abuses committed in the world’s second biggest executioner after China. The International Campaign for Human Rights in Iran (ICHRI), an NGO based in New York and the Netherlands, sounded alarm bells over undeclared executions, many taking place in groups, carried out at the Vakilabad Prison in the eastern city of Mashhad, the UAE daily The National reported Sunday.According to the ICHRI’s statement, based on the testimony of former prison inmates, prisoners are in many cases executed in groups and the last mass execution took place on October 12 when ten prisoners were executed together. A former inmate told the ICHRI that he was witness to 46 executions in one day in October 2009.According to Ahmad Ghabel, a religious scholar who spent three months at Vakilabad Prison earlier this year, at least 50 executions took place during his detention. http://www.alarabiya.net/articles/2010/10/31/124378.html
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Give the Devil a break!

Give the Devil a break!

The Devil isn’t destroying America, its people are.


Christians love to blame the Devil for everything....


I call it the Gospel according to Flip Wilson.


You remember
Flip Wilson, don’t you, and the phrase that he popularized as the cross-dressing Geraldine? “The Devil made me do it.”
We used to laugh at Flip’s characterization of Geraldine’s refusal to take responsibility for her actions. It was funny because we all knew that Geraldine’s problems should not be attributed to the wiles of old Slew-foot, but, rather, to her own willingness to gleefully give in to her sin nature.
Paul told us to “
resist the Devil.” Geraldine found it more gratifying to give in to him. Flip Wilson Christianity is permeating America.
Adam was the first person to point the finger. When it was discovered that he had chewed on the apple in
Genesis, God demanded an explanation from Adam for his blatant disregard for God’s direct command.
“What’s up with you?” God demanded of Adam. “Well, it was the WOMAN YOU gave me” Adam responds, paraphrasing Geraldine’s passing of the buck by laying the blame first at the feet of Eve, but ultimately at God Himself. “
The woman YOU gave me.”
We have been pointing the finger at others ever since.
http://www.newswithviews.com/Daubenmire/dave213.htm
Tags: religion  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Looking for Racism (and not finding it)

Looking for Racism (and not finding it)


Rich Benjamin embarked on a treacherous journey into the heart of enemy territory. No, he wasn't a soldier stationed in Afghanistan. And, no, he didn't masquerade as a veiled woman in Saudi Arabia.
A black man, Benjamin lived for three months at a time in these lily-white communities: St. George, Utah; Coeur d'Alene, Idaho; and Forsyth County, Georgia. He anticipated a gauntlet of racial hate. And yet he describes his journey this way, in his book, Searching for Whitopia.
In St. George, I fell in with a hospitable, if rowdy, poker crew, gathering for Texas hold 'em at least twice a week. Being a proud Episcopal, I regularly attended the Sunday services at Grace Church. ... I hiked up Taylor Creek in Zion National Park with the Episcopalian Seniors social group ... http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/10/looking_for_racism_in_all_the.html
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Watching Iran go nuclear

Watching Iran go nuclear


"Iran is entitled to the peaceful use of nuclear power," she said. "They are not entitled to a nuclear-weapons program."
But Bushehr only legitimizes Iran's own enrichment activity, which is conducted deep underground and away from the prying eyes of UN nuke inspectors.
Clinton has glossed over a terrible truth: The Obama administration now considers Iran a fellow nuclear power -- one as yet unarmed, yet someday soon, perhaps, a nuclear equal, fully armed.
But the US cannot acquiesce in this -- or the whole Middle East will fall under the mullahs' sway. Read more: http://www.nypost.com/p/news/opinion/editorials/fiddling_as_iran_goes
_nuclear_1ojNSq5lrI7V0B2ZYs599K#ixzz13YIShqIX
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Tuesday, Nov. 2, 2010: Referendum Day

Tuesday, Nov. 2, 2010: Referendum Day


Next Tuesday, Nov. 2, 2010, is not Election Day. It is Referendum Day.
It may be commonplace for commentators to announce that every election is "the most important election in our lifetime" or something analogous. But having never said that of a presidential election, let alone an off-year election, this commentator cannot be accused of crying wolf when I say that this off-year election is not simply the most important of my lifetime. It is the most important since the Civil War.
The reason is that unlike all previous elections, this one is actually a referendum on the direction of the United States of America.
If the Democrats win:
The American people have announced, consciously or not, that they support the Democratic Party's "fundamental transformation" – those were President Obama's words when he campaigned, and he has lived up to them – of America from a liberty-based state of limited government into an equality-based welfare state with an ever-expanding government.
America will change from a country that emphasizes producing wealth to a country that emphasizes redistribution of wealth.
The left has never been primarily interested in creating wealth. Its primary goal always and everywhere has been to redistribute it. That so many businessmen and much of Wall Street are only now awakening to this fact is only a testament to the staggering lack of wisdom in big business. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=220013
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

NPR's overdue execution

NPR's overdue execution


On June 30, 1972, two weeks after the Watergate burglars were taken into custody, Richard Nixon vetoed a congressional bill to double and treble federal funding for public broadcasting.
Nixon's stunning veto was sustained. Yet he had only "scotched the snake, not killed it," in the words of MacBeth.
Having escaped the ax, PBS and its little sister, National Public Radio, with their consistently leftist bias, grew fat on 40 years of federal money.
Nixon would express regret he had not followed the advice of those who urged him to terminate taxpayer funding and force public television and radio to compete fairly with private broadcasting.
Early in 2011, a Republican House and a more Republican Senate will have a second chance to succeed where Nixon, Ronald Reagan and George Bush I and II failed to try – to terminate tax funding of PBS and NPR.
This vote will be an early test of the GOP's claim that, having been burned in 2006 and 2008, it has learned its lesson, that Big Government conservatism was a fatal attraction and remains an oxymoron. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=219965
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

NAACP: Obsolete – for 30 years

NAACP: Obsolete – for 30 years


What of merit has the NAACP accomplished in the last 10 years (and trying to present a person indicted in two states for child pornography with their image award doesn't count)? As a matter of fact, what signature accomplishment can they legitimately point to in the past 30 years?
The answer is: There is nothing they can point to. The Civil Rights Act was signed in 1964 thanks to conservative Republicans, and because of Republican president Richard Nixon race-based affirmative action was passed in 1968. The schools have been integrated, blacks head Fortune 100 companies, blacks own sports teams, blacks are represented in every elected position nationwide, blacks are small-business owners, and blacks suffer the same realities as other Americans, ad nauseum.
So, apart from serving as a bureau of agitprop, making an industry out of perceived complaint/invented complaint and serving as the dismal catacombs of the past striving for relevance today – what do they represent? What would be lost if they closed their doors and passed into history with dignity? What do we gain – what value does the NAACP's continued existence today contribute to its once-august history?
They are the personification of a human menhir of mendacious duplicity. And their latest attempt to brand the tea-party movement as racist and extreme proves my accusations.
The new report the NAACP is touting as proof of the tea-party movement's radicalism is rife with innuendo, hearsay and vacuous conjecture. The report, "Tea Party Nationalism," was created by the little-known fringe group – The Institute for Research and Education on Human Rights, or IREHR.
NAACP President Benjamin Todd Jealous said the report "exposes the links between certain tea-party factions and acknowledged racist hate groups in the United States." http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=219765
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Voter guides for every state

Voter guides for every state


Will California legalize marijuana? Will the voters in Arizona or South Dakota approve it for medical use? Will new casinos be permitted in Maine or Oregon? And will Oklahoma residents prohibit their courts from any use of international or Shariah law?
These are a few of the questions that will be answered as voters go to the polls between now and next Tuesday. Elsewhere, Coloradans will again vote on the personhood of unborn children. They join voters in Indiana, Louisiana and Missouri in decisions about capping or cutting taxes on property.
It's kind of tough to keep it all straight – but we have some good news. Pick a state. Any state. Any candidate or ballot initiative, and Faith2Action has done the research for you – or found the folks who did.
What's on the ballot this year for my state? Can I vote early or by absentee ballot? What time are the polls open? Click on your state and find out what you need to know: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=219753
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

'They' hope we're stupid

'They' hope we're stupid


Classic songs from years past are sometimes referred to as "golden oldies." There are political fallacies that have been around for a long time as well. These might be called brass oldies. It certainly takes a lot of brass to keep repeating fallacies that were refuted long ago.
One of these brass oldies is a phrase that has been a perennial favorite of the left, "tax cuts for the rich." How long ago was this refuted? More than 80 years ago, the "tax cuts for the rich" argument was refuted, both in theory and in practice, by Andrew Mellon, who was secretary of the treasury in the 1920s.
When Mellon took office, there was a large national debt, the economy was stagnating and tax rates were high, though the tax revenues were still not enough to cover government expenditures. What was Mellon's prescription for getting out of this mess? A series of major cuts in the tax rates!
Then as now, there were people who failed to make the distinction between tax rates and tax revenues. Mellon said, "It seems difficult for some to understand that high rates of taxation do not necessarily mean large revenue for the Government, and that more revenue may often be obtained by lower rates." http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=219973
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Too Smart? Too Black? Too Deluded??

Too Smart? Too Black? Too Deluded??


Obama has to be one of the smartest, eloquent, calm and cool and psychologically well-balanced (think of Bill Clinton, George W. Bush or Richard Nixon) American presidents of modern times.
He's also one of the toughest, although he neither sounds it nor looks it. Shrewdly, and surprisingly candidly, an aide has recently described him as "the most unsentimental man I've ever met." Ruthlessness comes easily to Obama, that's to say, which is what it took for him to beat a presidential nomination rival as tough as Hillary Clinton.
And yet his popularity is dragging down toward 40 per cent and by all the omens his Democrats are about to get trounced in the November congressional elections.
Obama does have some serious problems. He's black.
Unquestionably, a lot of Americans hate their national leader being black, and, worse yet, a black who is the smartest man around. It's a variant, incomparably uglier, of the widespread loathing of John F. Kennedy for making people feel bad by being so handsome and sophisticated, sort of a presidential Clark Gable.
Then there's the economy. The lack of jobs is serious and perhaps even more so is the widespread insecurity among those who do have jobs. A double-dip recession is a real prospect.
Yet the truth - admittedly a near-irrelevancy in politics - is that Obama headed off a near-depression caused by Bush and corporate greed and arrogance and stupidity, and by his stimulus package brought the economy back at least to consciousness.
Included in this was financial regulatory reform and reform of the auto companies (it's working unexpectedly well). Also health-care reform.
Now he's attempting a second stimulus package. It's been blocked by the Republicans, who are insisting that planned tax cuts be extended to the wealthy (incomes above $250,000) as well as to the middle class.
This blockage of a second stimulus is being cheered on by the populist Tea Party movement. Go figure that, other than that many Tea Partiers undoubtedly can't stand the fact that he's black. http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/3721-obama-too-smart-too-black-for-declining-america
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Far Left: A Mass Nervous Breakdown

Far Left: A Mass Nervous Breakdown


The left can be mean, vicious, and deceitful. I've recently concluded, however, that the left is having, before our eyes, a mass nervous breakdown at the prospects of its collapse, exacerbated by the lost prospect of being on the verge of something really big. They thought they had won. Now, they're seeing it all crumble in a mountain of unsustainable debt, a loss of freedom, and an awakening of voter awareness of who's and what's at fault.
I first came to the conclusion that the left had crossed a sanity threshold to the point that its arguments were hurting its cause when President Obama and the patsy chorus on the left began attacking the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and other very American entities, without proof, of using foreign money on political ads.
The president himself had taken contributions of questionable origin. The left raises money from multinational sources the same way as those they accuse, but the left probably has a problem twice as incriminating. That angle of attack was a tactical error that sane, strategically thinking people would not make. It's irrational. http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/10/a_
mass_nervous_breakdown_of_th.html
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Don't waste your time impeaching Obama

Don't waste your time impeaching Obama


"It is impossible to calculate the moral mischief, if I may so express it, that mental lying has produced in society. When a man has so far corrupted and prostituted the chastity of his mind as to subscribe his professional belief to things he does not believe he has prepared himself for the commission of every other crime." ~Thomas Paine, The Age of Reason
From the moment Obama/Soetoro was sworn into office, Americans galvanized into Impeach Obama Now! factions.
However, there is a problem here because two wrongs don't make a right, which is why I have not supported any petitions calling for impeachment.
Despite the continued protestations by Obama/Soetoro supporters and professional liars in the dominant media, there is no question the usurper camped out in the White House was never eligible to run for president of these united States of America. All the huffing, puffing, vile name calling and protesting does not and cannot alter the legal fact that Obama/Soetoro was born with dual citizenship. It is his father's citizenship status at the time Obama/Soetoro was born that clearly makes him ineligible to be president.
We're all aware of the 40 or so lawsuits filed to expose Obama/Soetoro's perfidy and the decisions rendered by cowardly federal judges using the cop out - "standing" - as their justification in tossing the lawsuits. We're all aware that even though tens of thousands of Americans demanded the electoral college not certify the vote for the impostor on the ballot, they also proved to be gutless cowards or political hacks who value party loyalty over the U.S. Constitution. The final stop on the way to certifying an ineligible candidate was the U.S. Congress who sat on their cowardly backsides, January 9, 2009, knowing full well there were millions of Americans questioning the legitimacy of Obama/Soetoro's eligibility. Yet, not a single member of Congress (and that includes Ron Paul) stood up on the floor and objected. There is an orderly procedure that could have been triggered had one member of the Outlaw Congress stood up.[1] Instead, they all stood down and here we are today with a constitutional crisis that is not going away. http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd488.htm
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Checking in on La Raza

Checking in on La Raza


...The curriculum engendered racial irresponsibly, demeaned America’s civil institutions, undermined public servants, discounted any virtues in western civilization and taught disdain for American sovereignty, according the teacher who blew the whistle on the La Raza program. He also revealed that many of the instructors who taught the courses were not certified to teach.

"The goal of La Raza and other leftist or 'progressive' groups is to indoctrinate youngsters and cause them to reject traditional American values and culture," said political strategist Mike Baker.
'While they are starting in areas of the U.S. close to the U.S.-Mexico border -- such as California, Arizona and New Mexico -- they ultimately plan to gain access to northern school districts," Baker said. http://www.newswithviews.com/NWV-News/news223.htm
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive