About Me

Name: Diocuore
Email: mikecorthell@roadrunner.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Not a very bright idea

Not a very bright idea


''Energy companies can hit their targets in numerous other ways, including the much more effective insulation of solid wall homes. This, however, is seven times more expensive''

It wasn't just long-lost elderly relatives giving unwanted gift this Christmas. German-owned energy company Npower were at it too, cramming the already under-pressure postal service with 12 million low-energy light bulbs that households neither asked for nor required.
The packages are part of the company's legal obligation to cut carbon emissions but were sent out despite government advise that many would never be used.
Failure to meet its target for improving efficiency in homes would have led to a fine of more than £40 million, or 10 per cent of the Npower's turnover.
The Christmas delivery takes the amount of free or subsidised low-energy bulbs to 180 million in the past 18 months, leaving the average home with six unused ones.Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1240025/Not-bright-idea-Flawed-government-scheme-leaves-homes-swamped-180-million-unwanted-energy-saving-light-bulbs.html#ixzz0bYVADGVU
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Losing newsprint, saving trees

Losing newsprint, saving trees


''Officials said the local print edition will be distributed for free to "targeted audiences," including some federal government offices. At-home and office delivery will be offered at a premium price. The paper dropped its Saturday print edition last year with editors citing low circulation.'' The Washington Times slashed its staff by more than 40 percent and will eliminate its sports section and most local coverage in 2010, shifting its focus to politics, business and investigative reporting.
The 27-year-old newspaper announced the latest round of layoffs in its Thursday edition and said the last sports section would appear Friday. Among those let go was the newsroom leader, Managing Editor David Jones. Another round of cuts was made earlier in December, and the newspaper published its last Sunday edition last weekend.
The paper will publish a new weekday print edition starting Monday. It will focus on the newspaper's core strengths, including politics and cultural issues, President and Publisher Jonathan Slevin said Wednesday in a statement.
"Our market-based, forward-looking plan is both a response to the recessionary economy, continued downward financial pressures on the news industry and our transition into a 21st century multimedia enterprise," Slevin said.
The layoffs hit some high-profile beats, including journalists covering the Justice Department, Congress and foreign affairs.
The newspaper announced several management changes, though it's not clear who will oversee the newsroom operation. Christopher Dolan was appointed Wednesday as national politics editor and Brett Decker as editorial page editor. Jeffrey Birnbaum, the managing editor for digital operations, resigned that post but will continue as a columnist.
http://www.idahostatesman.com/nationalsports/story/1025964.html
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Gambling site to repay addict's lost millions

Gambling site to repay addict's lost millions


''Be wary, very wary you liquor store owners...''
In a surprising move, a gaming company has agreed to pay back some of the millions of kronor a company in Uppsala in eastern Sweden lost due to an employee’s gambling addiction.
“As far as I know, this is the first time this has happened,” Mattias Ekenberg with Swedish gaming addicts group Spelberoendes förening told the Upsala Nya Tidning (UNT) newspaper.The 4.9 million kronor ($673,000) repayment deal, details of which remain secret according to a representative from the Uppsala company, comes after the woman in charge of the firm’s finances gambled away 15 million kronor in company funds.The woman was recently sentenced to three years in prison and ordered to pay 10 million kronor in compensation to the company, which had to lay off some of its roughly 30 employees and saw what it expected to be a profitable year turn into one with a multi-million kronor loss because of the woman’s actions.The woman’s attorney, Anders Wallin, said he plans to ask the court to reduce the amount of money his client has been ordered to pay if he can confirm the gaming company’s repayment. http://www.thelocal.se/24076/20091228/
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

10 Things Your Auto Insurer Won't Tell You

10 Things Your Auto Insurer Won't Tell You


''Updated and adapted from the book, "1,001 Things They Won't Tell You: An Insider's Guide to Spending, Saving, and Living Wisely," by Jonathan Dahl and the editors of SmartMoney.''

3. “Spotty credit? That’ll cost you.”
Since the 1990s, insurers have discovered a strong correlation between low credit scores and filing lots of claims. Today, more than 90 percent of insurers use credit history in their underwriting, according to the Insurance Information Institute, a New York-based organization. Although consumer advocates argue that it unfairly penalizes the poor, it can also bite the middle class, says Birny Birnbaum, executive director at the Center for Economic Justice. After all, “87 percent of families in bankruptcy are there because of a job loss, medical catastrophe, or divorce,” he says.
Since many insurers do factor in credit history, it’s important to get your credit report from each of the three bureaus—TransUnion, Experian, and Equifax—and check them for errors before you shop for insurance.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Signs of the Times

Signs of the Times


''“Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace-- but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arms! Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle? What is it that gentlemen wish? What would they have? Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!” -Patrick Henry, March 23, 1775.''

I’ve read dozens of online articles lately, as well as emails and blogs that try to get the angry but not yet focused American public to question why the last 10 years has given us so many laws that rob us of Constitutional rights, ostensibly to provide for our security: the Patriot Act, which gave us the Department of Homeland Gestapo, I mean, Security and allows the government to arrest anyone deemed a terrorist and periodically redefine what a terrorist is; the National Defense Authorization Act, which gave us USNORTHCOM and CBRNE brigades, which allows active duty units to respond to domestic emergencies – presumably even Tea Parties that get just a little too loud; the National Criminal Information System (NCIS) Improvement Act, which allows the feds to disarms veterans and police officers who just happen to be trained to use firearms and military tactics but may be a harm to themselves or others because they were at some time in their lives diagnosed with PTSD; and the recent Hate Crimes Protection Act, which allows the feds to suppress public speech and religious expression against a federally protected subspecies, even if it means closing up churches and locking up pastors and members of that congregation.
There’s also the pending National Identification System, efforts to re-instate the so-called Fairness Doctrine, and growing proof of internment camps all around the country, already built and waiting for their residents.
Those of you who say you’re ready for the fight sure to come, let me ask you, are you really? Rest assured the man who hesitated three months to decide to send additional troops to Afghanistan will not hesitate to send troops to destroy lunatic
fringe elements like us, just as his mentor did in 1861.
I’m sorry, Chuck, but the internment camps are not for us. Those of us who’ve incited the Christian right Republicans, libertarians, and God & Gun Democrats will be singled out and eliminated. They won’t even bother to cure us of our thought crimes first. Most of us will become non-persons. The docile, outer party,
simple Americans who can’t focus their anger long enough to save their country will be housed in these camps where they’ll be worked, starved and systematically exterminated the same way Hitler, Stalin and Mao took care of who submitted to their demands to surrender their rights, property and personal dignity.
So again, I ask, are you ready for this fight? Are you willing to die trying to bring back our Constitutional Republic, as hundreds of thousands of Southern Americans did 150 years ago? As surely as no declaration was made to start that war, no peace treaty was ever signed to end it. The fight for liberty still lives in the hearts of every American willing to give his or her life for his country – not his government. Are you willing to live by the words of that great American patriot, Patrick Henry?
http://www.newswithviews.com/Murray/randy116.htm
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The malignant pleasures of food stuffed

The malignant pleasures of food stuffed


''To shed the weight with exercise, you need to combine it with eating the "right calories." And when you do, the muscles from exercise become a fat burning furnace and the junk in-the-trunk dissipates - so does the worry of losing 11 to 20 years of lifespan from diabetes.''

I have my own set of "fat and after" photos. And, if you’re carrying some "extra junk-in-the-trunk," so can you, if you want. I like to look at my "fat and after" pictures frequently.
To me, they reflect more than a radical physical transformation. They reflect a life change and serve as a reminder of my hostage situation.
When I was fat, I lived life on life’s terms. I ate what life served, usually meatball subs and Oatmeal Cream Pies (in moderation - I rationalized). I drank what life poured, usually liquid blubber masquerading as diet soda. And I exercised when life allowed, usually a few reps of bench press twice a week.
To me, life was like the proverbial pusher, always tempting me with its malignant, short term pleasures. And every time I gave in, I traded one of life’s simple and forgotten long-term treasures - like keeping the same belt size, chasing my kids endlessly in the park, and making love to my wife without gasping for air at the 4-minute mark.
As life’s malignancies caught up to me, I decided to live life on my terms. And my "after" photo shows how my body responded: It shed the fat that was holding me back from living young. We know fat kills. Some people make excuses not to shed it, while others risk it all to get their own "fat and after" photos. Nothing reflects this better than the hit show, "The Biggest Loser." Unfortunately, very few Biggest Losers remain winners.
http://www.newswithviews.com/Ellison/shane155.htm
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Under siege by evil characterless politicians

Under siege by evil characterless politicians


''A quote from Winston Churchill, "With integrity, nothing else counts. Without integrity, nothing else counts." I could not agree more. The kind of people we put in office is extremely important.

In defense of Bill Clinton, their democrat president, the liberal media campaigned to convince Americans that character does not matter. In the midst of the Clinton scandals, I was shocked to hear even a minister say Clinton's affairs were a personal matter and did not affect his presidency. The media spin worked...With Harry Reid and the democrats circumventing the will of the American people to pass their unprecedented massive government takeover of our lives disguised as a Health Care bill, Churchill's words could not ring more true. Integrity equals Character. And these evil people have none.
How did these scoundrels get elected? It has been said, "the people get the government they deserve." Do we deserve these socialists who are committed to changing America into an abomination of our Constitution, hijacking our freedom, liberty and culture; bankrupting the futures of our children and grandchildren? Is this the change many voted for? Did we bring Harry Reid's Horror on ourselves? I think not.
http://www.newswithviews.com/Marcus/lloyd107.htm
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

New shape to Noah's ark

New shape to Noah's ark


''The story has travelled down the centuries from the ancient Babylonians and continues to fascinate in the 21st century. Countless expeditions have travelled to Mount Ararat in Turkey, where Noah's Ark is said to have come to rest, but scientific proof of its existence has yet to be found.''

That they led the enormous floating wildlife collection aboard two by two is well known. Less familiar, however, is the possibility that the animals Noah shepherded on to his ark then went round and round inside.
According to newly translated instructions inscribed in ancient Babylonian on a clay tablet telling the story of the ark, the vessel that saved one virtuous man, his family and the animals from God's watery wrath was not the pointy-prowed craft of popular imagination but rather a giant circular reed raft.
The battered tablet, which is about 3700 years old, was found somewhere in the Middle East by Leonard Simmons, a largely self-educated Londoner who indulged his passion for history while serving in the Royal Air Force from 1945 to 1948.
The relic was passed to his son Douglas, who took it to one of the few people in the world who could read it as easily as the back of a cereal box - Irving Finkel, a British Museum expert, who translated its 60 lines of neat cuneiform script.
There are dozens of ancient tablets that describe the flood story, but Dr Finkel says this is the first to describe the vessel's shape.
http://www.theage.com.au/world/ancient-tablet-giving-new-shape-to-the-story-of-noahs-ark-20100102-lmii.html
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Uranium fuel is so last century - meet Thorium

Uranium fuel is so last century - meet Thorium


''Weinberg and his men proved the efficacy of thorium reactors in hundreds of tests at Oak Ridge from the ’50s through the early ’70s. But thorium hit a dead end. Locked in a struggle with a nuclear- armed Soviet Union, the US government in the ’60s chose to build uranium-fueled reactors — in part because they produce plutonium that can be refined into weapons-grade material.''

The thick hardbound volume was sitting on a shelf in a colleague’s office when Kirk Sorensen spotted it. A rookie NASA engineer at the Marshall Space Flight Center, Sorensen was researching nuclear-powered propulsion, and the book’s title — Fluid Fuel Reactors — jumped out at him. He picked it up and thumbed through it. Hours later, he was still reading, enchanted by the ideas but struggling with the arcane writing. “I took it home that night, but I didn’t understand all the nuclear terminology,” Sorensen says. He pored over it in the coming months, ultimately deciding that he held in his hands the key to the world’s energy future.
Published in 1958 under the auspices of the Atomic Energy Commission as part of its Atoms for Peace program, Fluid Fuel Reactors is a book only an engineer could love: a dense, 978-page account of research conducted at Oak Ridge National Lab, most of it under former director Alvin Weinberg. What caught Sorensen’s eye was the description of Weinberg’s experiments producing nuclear power with an element called thorium.
At the time, in 2000, Sorensen was just 25, engaged to be married and thrilled to be employed at his first serious job as a real aerospace engineer. A devout Mormon with a linebacker’s build and a marine’s crew cut, Sorensen made an unlikely iconoclast. But the book inspired him to pursue an intense study of nuclear energy over the next few years, during which he became convinced that thorium could solve the nuclear power industry’s most intractable problems. After it has been used as fuel for power plants, the element leaves behind minuscule amounts of waste. And that waste needs to be stored for only a few hundred years, not a few hundred thousand like other nuclear byproducts. Because it’s so plentiful in nature, it’s virtually inexhaustible. It’s also one of only a few substances that acts as a thermal breeder, in theory creating enough new fuel as it breaks down to sustain a high-temperature chain reaction indefinitely. And it would be virtually impossible for the byproducts of a thorium reactor to be used by terrorists or anyone else to make nuclear weapons.
http://www.wired.com/magazine/2009/12/ff_new_nukes/
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Will Iran fall before the Nukes?

Will Iran fall before the Nukes?


''The protests increasingly carry the potential to turn into a full scale civil disobedience campaign. It can be compared to the first Intifada the Palestinians launched against Israel in 1987. But there is one significant difference. The opponents of the regime know they have wide support in the West"

Analysts for Britain's MI6 intelligence agency are predicting the revolution which ended the shah's regime 30 years ago in Iran is poised to launch a new change in the embattled country in the New Year, according to a report from Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin.
The successors of those who rose to depose the detested shah in the coup d'etat of 1979 now find themselves cast as the enemies of the people.
The MI6 report came after Iran's Foreign Minister, Manoucher Mottaki, delivered an undiplomatic warning that Britain would receive a "slap in the mouth if it does not stop interfering in Iran."
The threat came after Britain's Foreign Secretary, David Milliband, had praised the "great courage" of the opposition supporters for their anti-government marches through Tehran during the holiday period. Eight people have been killed during the demonstrations and scores of injured, some seriously. Keep in touch with the most important breaking news stories about critical developments around the globe with
Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin, the premium, online intelligence news source edited and published by the founder of WND.
Hardly a day passes without the increasingly embattled regime of the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and his ever more despised protégé President Mahmoud Amadinejad, using the Revolutionary Guards against the people.
With every fatal bullet, with every ill-directed teargas canister and every ill-advised arrest, the heirs to Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini who overthrew the shah, are themselves fighting a losing battle against a population sufficiently roused to stage a new coup, says the MI6 analyst report.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=120616
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Remove the Marxist majority

Remove the Marxist majority


''There are dozens of conservative political parties, each shouting for attention, each working to restore American values and each being largely ignored by most Republicans, and all Democrats. On their own, none of the conservative parties, including the Republican Party, can remove the Marxist majority in Washington. Working together toward the common goal of changing the current majority, the conservatives cannot fail.''

The nation's most important New Year's resolution is to remove the Marxist majority in Washington. The most important question facing the nation is how to do it. There can be little doubt that the national sentiment opposes the Marxist policies being imposed by the current majority in Washington. Poll after poll, after parade, after tea party vividly demonstrates the nation's frustration with Obama's "fundamental transformation of America." Removal of this majority will take an extraordinary effort from people who are willing to put the nation ahead of ego, and work together to achieve the common goal.
An objective analysis of the situation leads to only one conclusion: Republicans must regain the majority in the 2010 election.
Of course, people who have been working for years to build a viable third party will disagree – violently. Those who hate George Bush, and by extension, all Republicans, will also disagree. Those who think Obama will somehow prevent another election have thrown in the towel and given up. The cold, hard truth is, however, that the Republican Party has the best, if not the only chance to unseat the current majority.
It's not too late to rescue the nation! Read how in "Save America Now! The New Revolution to Save Freedom and Liberty"
This does not mean that all of the people who are marching in the streets have to trade in their convictions and morph into Republicans. It means that the people who want to return America's government to the
vision set forth in the U.S. Constitution must seize control of the Republican Party and transform it into an unbeatable political power focused on restoring the Constitution, free markets, private-property rights and individual freedom.
In many ways, the Republican Party is no better than the Democratic Party, especially judging by
its performance in recent years. The fact remains, however, that it is the second-largest political party in the nation. It has an infrastructure in every state. Its candidates get on the ballot without the hassle experienced by third parties. There is an existing war chest and money stream. It is all available for the taking.
The quickest way to political power is to take control of the Republican Party, in every precinct, in every county, in every state and, finally, across the nation.
There are many great candidates working hard to gain recognition, funds and ballot access in several conservative political parties. Most are working in vain. These candidates should run as Republicans in Republican primaries, and then all join in support of the winning candidate. Any conservative candidate who has any chance to be elected would have an even better chance of getting elected as a Republican than as a third-party candidate.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=120710
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Barry AWOL in Iran crisis

Barry AWOL in Iran crisis


''Think what a different world we would have if the radical mullahs in Tehran were overthrown and a genuine democracy installed in its place. What if there were a government in Iran that actually sought nuclear power for peaceful purposes and not for bombs? What a different world it would be if the government in Iran stopped interfering in the affairs of Iraq and other neighbors!''

It is now abundantly and painfully clear that President Obama is clueless about America's national security interests in this dangerous world.
Obama is playing golf in Hawaii as the Islamist regime in Tehran shoots protesters in the streets and admits it has beaten to death scores of other protesters taken to jail. Obama's silence in not voicing support for the protesters is deafening.
Anyone who has watched events unfold in Iran over the past three months can see that the street protests have evolved from a protest against a stolen election to a wider protest against the regime itself. The protests are not only taking place in the capital but in major cities all across the country. The most recent protests featured banners and shouts aimed at America: "Obama, which side are you on?" is a chant heard often. Unfortunately, that's a good question.
Since the revolution in 1979 that overthrew the pro-Western shah, Iran has pretended to be a democracy, but its "fundamentalist regime" slowly concentrated power in the hands of radical clerics. So, Iran now pretends to be a democracy, and the world pretends to believe it. Last October, the regime pretended to have a presidential election but overplayed its hand by stuffing the ballot boxes.
In the last 27 years, over 120,000 citizens in Iran have been killed by the regime, executed after sham trials or simply shot or beaten to death in prison without benefit of a trial. The street protests are escalating because millions of Iranian citizens have decided they have no other recourse. The question is not, what do Iranians want? The question is, is the civilized world listening? Is Obama listening?
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=120718
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama could engender good will by giving Napolitano the boot

Obama could engender good will by giving Napolitano the boot


''...it was also a potential political gift to Obama. Americans rally around their president when we are threatened. Making the right moves now could prove a political boon to him. And the right move now is finding and installing a qualified homeland security secretary.''

Last March, our newly installed homeland security secretary, Janet Napolitano, explained, in an interview with German magazine Der Spiegel, her vision for fighting what was formerly known as terrorism.
By calling these now "man-caused disasters," she explained, we'd "move away from the politics of fear toward a policy of being prepared for all risks that can occur."
"Our policies will be guided by authoritative information. We also have assets at our disposal now that we did not have prior to 9/11. For example, we are much better able to keep track of travelers coming into the U.S. than we were before. The third thing is to work with our international partners and allies to make sure that we are getting information and sharing information in an appropriate and real-time fashion."
Yikes.
Laugh out loud at the Obama administration with this unique WND T-shirt
Putting Ms. Napolitano in charge of a department of 200,000 people and a $50 billion budget with a stated mission to "lead the unified national effort to secure the country and preserve our freedoms" was a "man caused disaster." And it is one that President Obama should fix – pronto.
His No. 1 priority to restore credibility in his administration's ability to protect Americans from terrorism should be replacement of Napolitano.
Her blundering performance on Sunday talk shows following the failed Christmas Day terrorist attempt to blow up an American plane showed clearly that this isn't the person we want responsible for the security of our homeland.
It's much more than her incredible observation that "the system worked."
Napolitano told CNN's Candy Crowley, "The traveling public is very, very safe in this air environment."
This despite answering every one of Crowley's probing questions with "I don't know."
Are there al-Qaida ties? How could he have gotten past security and on the plane carrying an explosive? How could he fly to the U.S. when his own father – a wealthy banker – briefed our embassy officials about what he saw his son up to?
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=120709
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Lot's of room in the underware bombers drawers

Lot's of room in the underware bombers drawers


''No doubt each terror scheme has its own special touch. But what they all have in common is an Islamist ideology, in the service of which the "suspects" feel impelled to try to kill Americans and savage not only the visible infrastructure, but also the unseen bonds of ease and trust that are part of the fabric of America's free society.''

"Isolated extremist" was the label President Barack Obama initially slapped on the Nigerian Muslim who flew into Detroit on Christmas Day, burning himself in a botched attempt to take down the plane with explosives sewn into his underwear.
If anyone seems isolated here, it is the U.S. president himself. For three days after the terrorist attack, Obama carried on with his Hawaii holiday, "monitoring" the situation while leaving his staff to deal with the public. When Obama finally appeared on Monday to make a statement, he gave a boilerplate nod to the potential terror connections of the "suspect," Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab: "We will not rest until we find all who were involved and hold them accountable." But in the same statement he went on to say that "This incident, like several that have preceded it, demonstrates that an alert and courageous citizenry are far more resilient than an isolated extremist."
http://www.forbes.com/2009/12/31/airline-terrorism-al-qaida-opinions-columnists-claudia-rosett.html
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive