About Me

Name: Corthell
Email: mikecorthell@roadrunner.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

This guy still goes to hell

This guy still goes to hell


George Soros, the multibillionaire investor who helped bankroll three initiatives to change drug laws in California, endorsed the marijuana legalization initiative Monday and plans to make a major financial contribution to the campaign.
Soros, who invested $3 million in the medical marijuana initiative and two other measures, made his announcement in an opinion piece published online by the Wall Street Journal. "Proposition 19 already is a winner no matter what happens on election day. The mere fact of its being on the ballot has elevated and legitimized public discourse about marijuana and marijuana policy in ways I could not have imagined a year ago," Soros wrote. The article is scheduled to appear in Tuesday’s print edition.
Soros, who runs a hedge fund and founded the Open Society Foundations, has not yet donated to the campaign. But Michael Vachon, an advisor to Soros, said that "he plans to make a significant contribution."
The initiative was the brainchild of Richard Lee, an Oakland medical marijuana entrepreneur who has spent at least $1.5 million to draft the measure, collect signatures to qualify it for the ballot and pay for a campaign. The wealthy donors who have helped to pay for past efforts to change California’s drug laws had largely stayed out of the campaign until the last few weeks.
Peter B. Lewis, a retired insurance company executive, recently donated $209,005 to the campaign, and George Zimmer, the founder and CEO of Men’s Wearhouse, recently gave $50,000. Both businessmen supported past initiatives to change the state’s drug laws. http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/10/multibillionaire-investor-george-soros-backs-proposition-19.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+lanowblog+%28L.A.+Now%29
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Democrat: The devil's middle name

Democrat: The devil's middle name


When the all-Democrat, devilish slave masters dressed themselves up as high society, donned the big-hooped skirts, the fashionable sideburns, and waistcoats, they flaunted their "goodness" in America's finest high society. They preened and pranced, all the while claiming that they were the good white people who gave their slaves far better lives than they could have had in the jungles of Africa. These Democrat do-gooders even trumped up a whole junk-science disciple (sounds a bit like "global warming," doesn't it?) to show that the black man's brain was inferior to the white one and that they -- the slavers -- were the paragons of virtue for putting free clothes on the backs of apes.
When Abe Lincoln ran as the first Republican president, the devilish Democrats took out the hate card faster than they could flip their bullwhips at a black man's back. Abe is a hater! Wants to rob us of our private property rights! He's really just a Negro, all dressed up to look white! The whole Dixie Democrat stronghold refused to even put Negro-Abe on the ballot in their states. http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/10/
the_big_blue_d_stands_for_devi.html
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Open Letter to Michael Moore

Open Letter to Michael Moore




Dear Michael Moore,

After reading your open letter to Juan Williams published on The Daily Beast, I thought I would write one of my own to you. While I take you as a man who prefers pictures to prose, unfortunately I am not much of a drawer so words will have to suffice.
While criticizing Williams in your letter for the comments he made about Muslims on Fox News, you find an area of agreement with the former NPR analyst over the suggestion that political correctness is obscuring an important debate on why America is under attack by extremist Muslims, even if you don’t phrase it that way.
I’m glad your concerned about the terrorism threat, Michael, though I should note that this seems like a new found interest considering you once preposterously (though surely level-headedly) wrote “
THERE…IS…NO…TERRORIST…THREAT!” Since we are reliving your greatest hits, I feel compelled to remind whatever voyeurs are reading my not-so-private letter to you of this brilliant piece of commentary you provided during the height of the Iraq War: “The Iraqis who have risen up against the occupation are not ‘insurgents’ or ‘terrorists’ or ‘The Enemy.’ They are the Revolution, the Minutemen, and their numbers will grow — and they will win.”
Let it not be said you do not take iconoclastic positions – even if they are supremely moronic.Read more:
http://dailycaller.com/2010/10/26/thedc-analysis-a-letter-to-michael-moore/#ixzz13SePgrY6
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The thought that counts

The thought that counts


National Public Radio has axed commentator Juan Williams for having impure thoughts about Muslims.
No, not that kind of impure thought. What got him in trouble was telling Fox News talker Bill O'Reilly that "when I get on a plane … if I see people who are in Muslim garb and I think, you know, they're identifying themselves first and foremost as Muslims, I get worried. I get nervous."
NPR issued a statement to the effect that the words violated NPR standards, but we wanted to look deeper, and our investigation led to an interview with NPR Director of Orthodoxy Howard Bashford.
He agreed to meet us in his office in a dingy Washington, D.C., storefront. There we found him seated at a simple, steel desk on which lay two stacks of manila file folders. On the walls were posters of Che Guevara and scenes of revolutionary socialist realism.
Taking the severe, straight chair he offered, we said, "Mr. Bashford, some might argue that in light of 9/11, the shoe bomber and the boxers-or-briefs bomber, Juan Williams was expressing a rational anxiety. Why should this get him in trouble?"
"It didn't, really," he replied.
Confused, we asked him to explain, and he continued, "Some might argue that Mr. Williams was fired for going public with his trepidation, but his is not the case. Williams' public expression was merely the symptom of the deeper problem. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=219333
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Countering China's ascendance

Countering China's ascendance


I spent last week in China as part of a board meeting with some of our joint venture business partners based in China. It was my first time in China, and some of my preconceived notions were shattered, as is the case for many people who visit there for the first time. But other perceptions were confirmed.
China is a communist country, but we were not met at the airport with machine gun-carrying soldiers. We were not harassed during our visit simply because we were Americans. In fact, we were warmly greeted and shown the best of hospitality by our business hosts and the government officials who were invited to attend our dinners and luncheons.
But communism is about government control. And despite the warm hospitality and reforms instituted over the last 20 years to create a hybrid communist-capitalist country, Big Brother is still Big Brother. It's just not as obvious as it was decades ago.
We visited the ancient Great Wall of China, which the Chinese started 200 years before Christ across their northern border, roughly 3,000 miles long, to protect themselves from their enemies to the north.
Today, there is another great wall technologically erected by the government to protect the people from outside influences. This wall blocks 1.3 billion people from social networking with the rest of the world. There's no Facebook, YouTube or Twitter allowed. There's none coming into the country, and there's none going out.
When I tried to access my 40,000 friends on Facebook and Twitter, it was blank!
The government owns all three telecommunications companies, and simply restricts incoming information from those sources. Too much information and an open exchange of information are considered a threat to government control. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=219365
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama is an insult to our intelligence

Obama is an insult to our intelligence


In an increasingly desperate attempt to develop a narrative for the coming Democratic collapse, the Democrats have indulged themselves in what for half a century they’ve habitually attributed to the American Right: the paranoid style in American politics. The talk is of dark conspiracies — secret money, foreign influence, and big corporations, with Karl Rove and, yes, Ed Gillespie lurking ominously behind the scenes. The only thing missing is the Halliburton-Cheney angle.
But after trotting out some of these with a noticeable lack of success, President Obama has come up with something new, something less common, something more befitting his stature and intellect. He’s now offering a scientific, indeed neurological, explanation for his current political troubles. The electorate apparently is deranged by its anxieties and fears to the point where it can’t think straight. Part of the reason “facts and science and argument does not seem to be winning the day all the time,” he explained to a Massachusetts audience, “is because we’re hard-wired not to always think clearly when we’re scared. And the country is scared.” http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/250647/obama-underappreciation-syndrome-charles-krauthammer
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Are there two? Three? Twelve?

Are there two? Three? Twelve?


I guess we have to jump right into this question---are there ANY politicians in Washington who are honest, honorable, balls-to-the-wall Constitutionalists?
Are there two? Three? Twelve? Fifty? A Hundred?
And don’t bother to get back to me with the name of Ron Paul, because that’s not what I’m talking about here. I’m talking about the question of whether there are ENOUGH Constitutionalists in the Congress after the election to turn things around. You know, turn the big oil tanker around. Turn Washington around. Because the label “Republican” certainly doesn’t do the job.
Individual freedom from government is the keystone of the Constitution. That means, among other things, the government has no right to tax citizens to an excessive degree. It also means government cannot continue to draft enormous budgets just because it decides “lots of people need government help.” http://www.newswithviews.com/Rappoport/jon112.htm
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

On Election day, November 2,

On Election day, November 2,


Election day, November 2, is a critical national referendum on President Obama’s big government agenda. That day across the nation Americans will enter their polling booths and cast ballots that will determine whether the regnant Democratic party retains control of the House and the Senate. America has a chance to translate its discontent over high unemployment, massive federal bailouts and takeovers, and an all-consuming national debt into action that will render President Obama a lame duck for the remaining two years of his presidency. If they pursue that course, they will be laying an essential foundation for reclaiming the American dream.
On November 2 we will either continue traversing the path the President has charted for us where no faith exists for private initiative in a free market and where the private sector is increasingly structured and controlled by a leviathan regulatory state, or we will alter that course by placing our faith once again in the private initiative that has made us a great people, move to dismantle the regulatory state, and liberate the private sector to catapult America into a new age of innovation and prosperity. http://www.newswithviews.com/Emord/jonathan159.htm
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Welcoming our destruction

Welcoming our destruction


Each year, America accepts 1.3 million legal immigrants. On top of that, immigrants birth 900,000 babies within the United States annually. When you add the minimum of 800,000 illegal alien migrants that walk over our borders or visa overstays, the United States absorbs 3.1 million immigrants, give or take a few thousand—annually. Another 400,000 illegal migrant women cross over to give ‘anchor baby’ births, which I won’t account for here. (Source: http://www.cis.org/ with Dr. Steven Camarata)
But, fellow Americans, that’s not enough! Last week, President Barack Obama announced that he will invite an additional 80,000 immigrants –mostly from Islamic countries – to resettle in the United States during fiscal year 2011. Obama said, “…is justified by humanitarian concerns or is otherwise in the national interest.”
In other words, they will all utilize U.S. public assistance: food stamps, welfare, assisted housing, free breakfast and lunches for their children, education, free medical—all billed to the stretched-to-the-limit, good will of Americans ignored by Obama. What sense does that make? Total cost per year: $346 billion according to the Edwin Rubenstein Report.
The following “goals” for new immigrants have been set as follows: http://www.newswithviews.com/Wooldridge/frosty604.htm
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Propaganda Presidents

The Propaganda Presidents


And who can forget “The Big Lie” of Obama’s so-called stimulus plan – which administration officials said would save or create more than 3 million jobs and keep unemployment below 8 percent? Clearly those assumptions – along with Vice President Joe Biden’s promised “Summer of Recovery” – were diversions designed to fool the American people.
As America heads to the polls in November, let’s hope we don’t get fooled again.

''after Bush Republicans used “The Big Lie” to grow government and rack up huge deficits (while telling us they were for “limited government and less spending”), President Barack Obama is now using it to expand government further and rack up even larger deficits under the banner of “hope and change.”''

While you can’t fool “all of the people, all of the time,” it is surprisingly easy to fool a sufficient number of them to get elected.
“People will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it.”
That’s an excerpt from a World War II-era military intelligence report – a document which explored the psychological profile of one of our nation’s (and the world’s) most dangerous enemies. It also represents perhaps the most succinct encapsulation of the modern-day propaganda method commonly referred to as “The Big Lie.”
Who was the subject of this particular intelligence report? Adolf Hitler. http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/political_commentary/
commentary_by_howard_rich/obama_s_big_lies_get_bigger
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Wealth of Lemmings

The Wealth of Lemmings


Tags: cartoon  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama craps in his hat

Obama craps in his hat

At a Wilmington rally for Democratic Delaware Senate candidate Chris Coons today, President Obama laid to rest any remaining speculation that Hillary Clinton and Joe Biden might switch jobs in 2012, telling a packed crowd in Biden's home state that his choice of vice president was "the single best decision I have made."
He then gave the vice president a hug and called him an "extraordinary" vice president, a "fighter" and "someone who knows what our core mission is." http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20019781-503544.html?tag=cbsnewsMainColumnArea
Tags: obama   BIDEN  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

When do you feel most lonely? Why

Corthell & Company
News & Opinion


When do you feel most lonely? Why

Democrat 'trolls' skulking online

   Corthell on Blogger            Corthell on Facebook 

Tags: corthell  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Your cell phone is made to kill you

   Corthell on Blogger            Corthell on Facebook 


Corthell on Twitter

 Corthell & Company
News & Opinion  

What did you want to be growing up?
What do you do now? What is your dream job now?

Your cell phone is made to kill you

  
''...for studies of people who have been heavy cellphone users (defined as someone who has made a half-hour call a day for 10 years), there is a 50 percent increase in brain cancer overall. And among the heaviest users there's a two- to fourfold increased risk.''
Strange how hard it is to remember a time before cellphones. Mobile phones have changed the way we spend our leisure time, the way we work and how we consume everything from groceries to news stories. Some countries even set up centers to treat those "addicted" to iPhones or BlackBerrys. But, as a new book shows, cellphones may actually be doing damage to far more than our attention spans -- and could, in fact, be killing us.
Devra Davis, a scientist and National Book Award finalist for "When Smoke Ran Like Water," looks at the connection between cellphones and health problems, with some disturbing results. Recent studies have tied cellphone use to rises in brain damage, cheek cancer and malfunctioning sperm. She reveals the unsettling fact that many new cellphones now come with the small-print warning that they are to be kept at least one-inch from the ear (presumably for safety reasons) and many insurance companies refuse to insure cellphone companies against health-related claims. Most troubling of all, science has shown that children and teenagers are particularly susceptible to cellphone radiation, raising questions about its effects on coming generations.
 
 
Comment?  

Gen Z: Babybook 

 

  'I plot your doom' 

All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.  
Tags: corthell  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive