About Me

Name: Corthell
Email: mikecorthell@roadrunner.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Fire? Hand me the squirt-gun

Peeing on the fire

Tags: POTUS  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Waking to the American Constitution

Waking to the American Constitution


Across America, a Constitutional awakening is arising. And just in time because something is brewing. The world is being politically and economically internationalized. The big “transformation” has been in motion for a long time and now it is heading for the finish line. Let’s call this transformation, “Globalism.” So what are the tentacles of modern globalism?
Private property is under attack. Americans no longer feel confident that government secures the protection of their property. Instead, policies are being implemented, through our American government, which actually attack the idea of private property. Globalist philosophy has swarmed all branches and all levels of American government. Is there a connection between globalism and the loss of our rights?
Our leaders who are working for their own seat at the international table have convoluted the interpretation of the American Constitution. At the core, these people seek to negate the political recognition of an individual’s unalienable rights – one’s natural right to life, liberty and the use of his property. http://www.newswithviews.com/Shaw/michael129.htm
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

See: GOP may blow the election

See: GOP may blow the election


I was not stunned to see republican John Boehner facing off against his own stupidity on Fox News Sunday just like the old party hack that he is.
On at least five occasions he evaded answering questions asked of him by Fox News Anchor and host Chris Wallace.
My wife yelled from the kitchen when Boehner seemed determined to avoid answering directly about what specifically he would do different than Pelosi should he be elected the next House Speaker.
My wife’s sweet vocal tones almost stepped on his non-answer and she uttered the most intelligent thought of the day.
Boehner answered Wallace’s question, several times, with the moronic retort that it “wouldn’t be business as usual.”
My loving wife hollered-“Isn’t avoiding an answer to the question… business as usual?”
How right she is!
The phony J.C. Penney men’s-wear mannequin look-alike could effortlessly fit in to any wax museum arrangement without being noticed.
The shocking apathy of the American voter and the unrealistic expectations of the Tea Party crowd, will lead to real disappointment when they catch on later that the November elections will result in roughly 90% of Congress being re-elected.
I really don’t think that represents much of a change.

Tags: GOP  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Jesus and Women: Dangerous

Jesus and Women: Dangerous


Radio “common tater” Rush Limbaugh was on a roll on October 1, 2010. He is getting tired of hearing his friends tell him the conservative women already winning in many of the primaries can’t possibly win against the obvious Marxist Democrats in the general election and his friends are saying these women are an embarrassment to the GOP; however, if you want real GOP embarrassment, read the 6/29/1989 Washington Times article below. Rush is beginning to ask these friends if they had the courage to run in the first place if they could stand up under the scrutiny of the left-wing media?
How would many of them respond when being put under the microscope on a daily basis? How many “lofty perch perfectionists” have ever wrecked a car or gotten a speeding or DUII ticket or even a parking ticket? How many of them have spent time on a psychiatrist’s couch? How many of them are on anti-depressant drugs? How many are alcoholics? How many of them are closet homosexuals or cross dressers? How many of these Monday morning quarterbacks who denigrate these conservative women have been audited by the I.R.S? How many have been late on mortgage or credit card payments? How many peak at porno sites when no one is looking? How many have an illegitimate child or two running around about which they are aware or unaware or how many have impregnated some woman causing her to get an abortion? How many have had divorces and what might their ex spouse say about them? How many have troubled children? And I’m sure readers can add to this list. These “flawless life” critics say these conservative “kooky” women are unelectable. They don’t look good on T.V. or at interviews by the “gotcha” mainstream media pundits who ask questions of newcomers they wouldn’t dream of asking the entrenched politician. http://www.newswithviews.com/Betty/Freauf174.htm
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

God sends Obama another message

God sends Obama another message

President Barack Obama looks over his podium after the presidential seal fell off of it while he was speaking at Fortune's Most Powerful Women Summit in Washington, Tuesday, Oct. 5, 2010.



The presidential seal has fallen off President Barack Obama's podium and clattered to the stage as Obama delivered a speech to a women's conference.
The president was joking with the audience and getting some laughs when he realized what happened. "All of you know who I am," he quipped.
Obama told the audience that somebody in the back was really nervous, referring to the staffer who hung the seal on the front of the lectern so precariously.
The seal fell about halfway through the president's remarks to Fortune magazine's "Most Powerful Women Summit" Tuesday at Carnegie Mellon Auditorium in Washington. http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?section=news/politics&id=7708960
Tags: obama   god  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bill Clinton: Force Isreal to surrender

Bill Clinton: Force Isreal to surrender

"FOR BEHOLD, in those days and at that time when I shall reverse the captivity and restore the fortunes of Judah and Jerusalem, I will gather all nations and will bring them down into the Valley of Jehoshaphat, and there will I deal with and execute judgment upon them for their treatment of My people and of My heritage Israel, whom they have scattered among the nations and because they have divided My land."

Former United States President Bill Clinton said Tuesday that forcing Israel to surrender Judea and Samaria to the American-backed Palestinian Authority would take away much of the motivation for terrorism around the world.
He described the long-running Arab-Israeli conflict as the key problem in the region and said resolving it would have a knock on effect that could result in Syria ending its support for the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah and Iran turning back its controversial nuclear program.
"It will take about half the impetus in the whole world — not just the region, the whole world — for terror away," he told an audience of Egyptian businessmen from the American Chamber of Commerce in Egypt. "It would have more impact by far than anything else that could be done."
He said both sides knew the outlines of any final agreement and said it was similar to the one he hammered out with Yasser Arafat and Ehud Barak in 2000. Original Article
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Al Sharpton: A fine roll of Charmin®

Al Sharpton: A fine roll of Charmin®


Labor unionists and NAACP members from around the country gathered at the Lincoln Memorial Saturday to rally for education, jobs and justice. Speakers at the “One Nation Working Together” rally — including NAACP President Ben Jealous, the Rev. Al Sharpton, MSNBC commentator Ed Schultz and the Rev. Jesse Jackson — mostly stuck to talking points about education, jobs, and justice, while encouraging those in the crowd to get out and vote on Nov. 2. Another theme at the rally was that progressives accepted everyone under their tent while conservatives helped only wealthy people... Original Article
Tags: Al Sharpton  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

One Nation Rally: Divide and Slide

One Nation Rally: Divide and Slide


All of these people want free health care (they already got the free lunch and T-shirt when they were bused in).
A crowd of about one trillion people attended the hard-left progressive One Nation rally on the Mall Saturday in Washington, D.C. Leave aside for a moment that there are around seven billion people inhabiting the entire planet, attendees came from as far away as Alpha Centauri and Uranus to attend the rally in support of Barack Obama and his big government agenda. All of these people want free health care (they already got the free lunch and T-shirt when they were bused in). In all seriousness, if you weren't watching MSNBC's kind coverage...Favorite signs included: "Tax the Rich, Socialist Party U.S.A." and "Jobs for Justice"
Best tweet of the day: @radishthegreat: If they put as much effort into working as they do demanding other people’s money, they could be the “rich” they hate
The event organizers included such noble American groups as the Communist Party U.S.A., Democratic Socialists of America and the International Socialist Organization. Original Article
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Porcine Problem

Porcine Problem

Tags: pork  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Moral relativism on the 'right'

Moral relativism on the 'right'



Moral relativism has always been a problem of the left.
Liberals, progressives and socialists of various stripes are fond of imposing their moral code on others – from coercive redistribution of wealth to invented "rights" for people based on sexual proclivities to "choice" to kill unwanted, unborn babies – without any transcendent basis for their convictions.
But now, peculiarly, the "right" is becoming seduced by this intellectually bankrupt concept of moral relativism – to the great peril of the United States of America.
First, let's define moral relativism: Moral relativism is the view that ethical standards, morality and positions of right or wrong are culturally based and therefore subject to a person's individual choice. We can all decide what is right for ourselves.
The Bible strictly and repeatedly warns against this concept with illustrations from history: "Ye shall not do after all the things that we do here this day, every man whatsoever is right in his own eyes" (Deuteronomy 12:8). Instead, the Bible reveals God's standards of approved and disapproved conduct for mankind. Like it or not, believer or atheist, this revelation is the basis for the laws that led to western civilization. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=211157
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

An ugly Fall

An ugly Fall


For more than two years, I have been tracking the fraud being committed on an ongoing basis by America's largest banks. As I described in a June column titled "The bank-failure recovery," all of America's largest banks have been inaccurately reporting the value of their assets. Based on the information revealed by the FDIC regarding the 129 bank failures this year, it is safe to conclude that around 45 percent of the value of the financial assets reported by the banks are, in fact, completely worthless.
That means that the $7.5 trillion in assets reported by America's four largest banks, Bank of America, Citibank, JP Morgan/Chase and Wells Fargo are actually worth closer to $4 trillion. More than $3 trillion on their collective books is simply fictitious, created by the crude artifice of claiming that an asset, such as a home mortgage, that can currently be sold for $x is worth $1.82x on their books. This is what financial cynics term "mark to fantasy," which means that the accounting values are whatever the bank deems them to be, as opposed to "mark to market," which is the price that someone has been willing to pay for a comparable asset in the real world.
This was the situation as of June. But new revelations of even more shenanigans on the part of the greatest beneficiaries of the TARP bailout indicate that things are much worse than nearly anyone had realized. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=211161
Tags: fall  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I told you so!, I told you so!

I told you so!


No, I'm not gloating. I'm as appalled as any free-market conservative would be, but I want you to be prepared for the future – which is upon us.
In my Sept. 20 WND column, "Another recipe for financial disaster," I laid out the plan for an air cleanup in the San Francisco Bay Area, as proposed by the unelected, nine-county Bay Area Air Quality Management District.
I said it will drastically change lives and cost everyone a lot of money. Those proposals cover everything from home fireplaces, cows, wineries, housing developments, energy and car usage, manufacturing emissions, tolls to "control" congestion plus restrictions on farming, dairies and construction.
I warned, "Watch out, America. What starts in California inevitably spreads and could wind up in your backyard."
Well, here it is, all aimed at our cars and trucks.
Last Friday, the Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Transportation Department presented its "notice of intent" – the latest guidelines to rid us of those dreaded greenhouse gases that contribute to global warming.
Oops, let me correct that. They don't call them guidelines yet – just scenarios. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=211169
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Democrats' class-warfare trash

Democrats' class-warfare trash


President Obama and the Democratic leadership in Congress believe it is practically immoral to allow people who have made a lot of money to decide how they want to spend it. It is equally immoral for some people to think that they are entitled to other people's money through the force of the government.
Class warfare has been a winning tactic for Democrats for a long time, but a lot of voters are waking up to the false promise of that old tired song. Some people are realizing that they might be "rich" one day. They are asking the question that, if they work their anchovies off to make some real money, then why should the government take it and redistribute it to those who did not want to take risks and work 24/7 for themselves and their families?
Studies have shown for decades that a majority of people who start out in the lowest economic quintile (20 percent) will advance at least two quintiles higher over time with some of them making it all the way to the top quintile. My dad was one on those achievers. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=211281
Tags: Democrats  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

History by (Persian) design

History by (Persian) design


With the imprint of carpet weave in his forehead, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad rose from his evening prayers and joined us in his presidential office for a frank interview.
Having learned from such stalwart journalists as those on NBC, we didn't pull any punches and hit him right between the eyes with our most penetrating question.
"Are you a bad guy?" we asked.
"No," he answered.
Again, taking our cue from network journalism, we thanked Iran's president for his forthright answer and prepared to take our leave, but he stopped us.
"You seem like a fair-minded infidel," he said. "So I'd like to expand on my recent remarks to the United Nations."
"You mean … like that thing about the 9/11 attacks being 'orchestrated' by 'some segments within the U.S. government'?" we asked.
"Indeed," he answered. "That and other examples of western imperialist manipulation."
As we re-opened our notebook and held our pen at the ready, the Iranian president held forth:
"The majority of the American people agree the attack was staged to reverse the declining American economy and its grips on the Middle East in order to save the Zionist regime.
"This is in keeping with United States practice from the beginning of time."
"Can you give us some more examples?" we ventured.
"Of course," he said kindly. "The Dec. 7, 1941, 'attack' on Pearl Harbor is a very good example. Roosevelt's – or should I say Rosenfeld's – New Deal couldn't pull America out of the Great Depression, so elements within the U.S. government staged the air raid.
"It was just like when American agents shot the Archduke Franz Ferdinand in Sarajevo in 1914, precipitating World War I."
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=211145
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Social Security: Dying to Die

Social Security: Dying to Die

A Ponzi rip off then and now.


Keeping government limited is a practical approach to governing that opens the door to growth and prosperity.
Why?
Consider a fundamental difference between business and government. Any businessman operating successfully is in touch with reality, with change, and acts with speed to make adjustments necessary to survive.
Businesses are not democracies, so a CEO can execute what needs to be done on the spot.
Government is the opposite. It is allergic to change. They say government programs are like headless nails. Once in, they're impossible to get out. Programs produce interests who then fight change.
So it should be obvious that if we want a nation that is vibrant, in touch with reality, changing as it needs to in a timely way, the reach of government must be limited.
Consider Social Security....

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=210789
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive