About Me

Name: Diocuore
Email: mikecorthell@roadrunner.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

It's not the economy, Stupid!

It's not the economy, Stupid!



''Obama is planning on deficits in excess of a trillion dollars from here forward, even after the economy fully recovers. The country cannot sustain this. The public knows it and is outraged and horrified by it. Our children cannot live in freedom if this insane recklessness is not stopped. It's not about the economy, stupid! It's about the survival of this great nation.''

The Washington Post's Dan Balz thinks that "with new priorities, Obama and Democrats can recover in 2010." Sorry, Dan, it's about more than priorities. It's a matter of their worldview.
Balz dutifully cites "the size of the problems President Obama inherited" and "the battles he chose to take on during his first year" as mitigating factors that may lead to the public's understanding and allow Obama an opportunity to hit "the reset button."
Balz says Obama's advisers believe he can "pivot" in the first few months of 2010 and restore his standing with the American people. Balz offers four "elements" that "might allow that to happen": refocus on the economy, move Congress offstage, get serious about the deficit and spending and avoid overloading the circuits.
Let's briefly examine Balz's analysis – an analysis that is doubtlessly typical for Beltway media elites.
First, Obama's free-falling approval ratings are not a result of problems he inherited. How long are he and his liberal media shills going to milk this "blame Bush" mantra like a bunch of reprobate school kids? Balz is onto something, however, in citing "the battles he chose to take on during his first year." But he's wrong that it is a mitigating factor.
Let me throw out something that's a bit counterintuitive. I don't believe the public has lost faith in Obama over the economy. And the public's angst is about more than just its losing faith in him.
The public is scared to death – not about the ebbs and flows of the economy in the short term, but about the very survival of the country – because of the reckless spending policies Obama is deliberately pursuing and the other "elements" of his destructive agenda to remake America in his image – including going soft on terrorism.
What Balz needs to get through his head – and then share with his impervious colleagues – is that Obama didn't undertake his radical agenda to turn America into a full-blown socialist state because of "the size of the problems (he) inherited." That was just a convenient excuse.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=120324
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Socialist revolution in progress

Socialist revolution in progress



Want a fun trip to a socialist, liberal la la land?
Come to the discussion forum

I need help,

Miguel

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Democrats support global socialism

Democrats support global socialism


“What the world needs is a global New Deal.”

Former Democratic Party chairman Howard Dean said on December 8 that “cooperation” between European socialists and the Democratic Party has “intensified significantly” over the last several years and involves “regular contact” at “Congress, Senate, party and foundation levels.” He added that “efforts have been remarkable from both sides.”
But at a “
Global Progress Conference” in October, President Barack Obama’s pollster, Joel Benenson, acknowledged that socialized medicine in the U.S. faces a serious obstacle. He said that while Europeans are receptive to the expansion of government in their lives, in America there is an anti-government culture which prevents people from “expecting the State to solve their problems.”
“This explains why Obama will find it difficult to implement the social coverage plans such as a broader health service,”
Benenson reportedly said.
The conference was held in Madrid, Spain under the patronage of Spain’s socialist Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, whose pro-homosexual and pro-abortion policies have led to
street protests by thousands of supporters of traditional values. Zapatero is also under fire for a jobless rate of nearly 18 percent.
Dean’s comments came in
a video address in which he joked that his failure to personally attend the Party of European Socialists (PES) convention, which was advertised as a “carbon neutral congress,” was actually a smart move because he avoided flying and contributing to global warming. “We’ve saved a lot of carbon,” Dean said. http://www.newswithviews.com/Kincaid/cliff378.htm
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Top 10 health scandals of 2009

Top 10 health scandals of 2009


''Last year health pundits warned President Obama that there were just too many medication scandals to attempt health care reform. Amazingly, but not surprisingly, the single most important topic regarding health care reform was absent from the national debate.''

2009 is another bumper crop year for health scandals, an unfortunate trend that shows no signs of improvement. To the contrary, consumers should do everything in their power to stay healthy as the Big Pharma-sponsored medical profession continues to induce millions of serious injuries and hundreds of thousands of deaths per year.
#10 –
The Failure Empire: Bob Greene Rakes It In, Oprah Fails
The scene is comic: Bob Greene sitting next to Oprah on her TV show, kicking off the New Year, as Oprah tries to explain to her viewing audience why she gained forty pounds – again. Not once did she turn to Greene and say, “Bob, I guess your program is just a bit too hard to follow, something must be wrong with it.”
As 2009 comes to a close Oprah’s new plan didn’t seem to work for her – again.
#9 –
Surprisingly High Cancer Risk from CT Scans
Isn’t it nice to know that the medical profession caused 29,000 future cases of cancer in 2007 from the CT scans it performed on patients (a great tool for future business). Think twice before falling for a heart scan ad you hear on the radio; the risk for a woman getting cancer from it is 1 in 270. These are some of the remarkable numbers coming from two new studies published Monday in the Archives of Internal Medicine... http://www.newswithviews.com/Richards/byron188.htm
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Credibility in scary times

Credibility in scary times


''These are scary times, that is true. We have a man in the Oval Office intent on burning the Constitution and Bill of Rights to the ground, intent on turning our nation into a police state with third-world status.''

Ronald Reagan once quipped, "trust but verify"—an axiom that serves us well.
Increasingly, since Also Known As (AKA) Obama was given the blessing of Congress to occupy the White House and act in the capacity of "president" (even though evidence indicates he is not a natural-born citizen as required by Article II, Section 1, Clause 5, United States Constitution); as more and more Americans have come to the realization that the "different kind of politician" they voted for is a Marxist with the intent of enslaving them and turning the United States into a police state; commentaries have found validity on the e-waves that are anything but. The tendency is to look on anything put out about AKA with an eye that it certainly is possible in light of his Marxist agenda.
Possible, maybe, but whether it is true is what we need to consider and act on.
At the latter end of September, stories were flying around the internet about a detention facility in Hardin, Montana, how (sic) "AKA's goons had taken over the town as a police state model that would be spread across the United States." The stories were flying fast and hard, each one, it seemed, trying to outdo the last in the "police state" department.
People were lapping it up. The ripples of anger across the surface of the growing discontent were palpable.
http://www.newswithviews.com/Stuter/stuter169.htm
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Spell dark ages: I-s-l-a-m-i-c R-u-l-e

Spell dark ages: I-s-l-a-m-i-c R-u-l-e


(Editor's note: This article, originally published July 19, 2005, has been modified from its original publication to reflect today's current events.)
First let me cede the requisite acknowledgements that early Islamists played a key role in the developing culture of their day. Mathematics, medicine, astronomy, geography and Arabic numbers factored prominently into their time and beyond.
But that was then, and this is now. Back then there were no Afghans to culturally imprison, no tall buildings to blow up and no passenger jets to hijack for purposes of same; there were no embassies in Kenya, no USS Cole, no subway systems in Great Britain and Spain; no night clubs in Bali and Germany, and the Philippines were not a destination point for proselytizing and recruitment. Great Britain was not quite the "great devil," and the United States had yet to pour billions of dollars into their lands not least of all to supply the technology that has made Muslim despotic families the wealthiest in the world – sitting on lavatory thrones with gold seats, while the people starve in the streets.
The Islamic religion that played an important role in the development of early civilization has been usurped and co-opted by crazed, ego-maniacal madmen called mullahs, ayatollahs and sheikhs – among whom it can be argued based on the historical record, Muhammad was chief – allowing a reasonable mind finds beheading, rape and conquest barbaric.
These madmen can promote and postulate any delusional reason they can divine for their oppressive behavior. My question is what would the world be like if they ruled it? Would the bombings, murders and mutilations of children be part of their world view? Would kidnapping and ceremonial beheadings exampled by Muhammad be part of their code enforcement?
Can we assume by their butchering of innocent men, women and children in Iraq that this is their idea of leaping into the 21st century with liberties and freedoms for all? Is this their way of embracing democracy?
Or should we look to Afghanistan, where women were students and professionals before Taliban Muslims took over in 1994? Is the brutal oppression women experienced under the genteel and warm religion (sarcasm intended) what the women of the world desire?
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=120320
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Moral force or moral meltdown?

Moral force or moral meltdown?


"There is no way to solve the great perplexing international problems except by bringing to bear upon them the force of Christianity …"
"There is no doubt whatever in my mind but that moral force is the only force that can accomplish great things in the world. If you look back to the history of our own country, you will find that our finest institutions were primarily molded by the Christian belief of our founders. They believed that there was such a thing as moral law and that there was a Creator who endowed men with inalienable rights."
These politically incorrect words could easily be attributed to ones of the feared and hated "Religious Right" – but alas, they cannot so easily be marginalized. These are from "Moral force in world affairs," an article printed in the August 1948 edition of Reader's Digest, authored by John Foster Dulles – later to serve as secretary of state for President Dwight Eisenhower and a recipient of the Medal of Freedom.
Dulles had many similarities in experience and heritage to John Quincy Adams. His grandfather served as secretary of state under Benjamin Harrison, and his own path was forged early by accompanying his grandfather at age 19 to the 1907 Second Hague Peace Conference as Adams accompanied his father at age 12 to Europe. Dulles' father was a Presbyterian minister, and that heritage guided much of his life and philosophy. The Reader's Digest article described him as a "widely known lawyer and leading churchman" while his obituary also called him "a moralist."
He references that his grandfather's effectiveness in diplomacy was that he "partook of the great quality which possessed our nation at that time – a quality of righteousness and justice for which all men were reaching out. We were able to supply it because in essence we were a Christian nation."
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=120321
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

America: Time to fight for your lives!

America: Time to fight for your lives!


''Visit your U.S. representatives this week while they're home. We need to duplicate and multiply the town hall meetings in every single office. Remember, we're fighting for our lives here. Unless you want government (death) panels telling you what health care you're "allowed" to get, you'd better be telling them what you want right now.''

Pray about what leadership role you will play in this critical event. We need state coordinators who can rally the churches and organizations who love God with their whole hearts and profess Jesus as Savior and Lord. If you are interested in playing a part in this critical day, please go to the May Day 2010 website or e-mail me with "May Day" in the subject line.
We need God. And God works through ordinary people like us. Be a part of changing the history of America – meet with your U.S. representatives this week. Then do all you can to bring the remnant to Washington for the most important meeting of all: the meeting with the God of our founders.
Our lives, our freedoms, and our future depend on it.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=120323
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Harvard's disgraceful obeisance to Nazi Germany

Harvard's disgraceful obeisance to Nazi Germany


''If it is fitting and proper to so remember Harvard alumni who were our country's German enemies, why is there no such memorial to more than 60 Harvard alumni who served in the armies of the Confederate States of America? (Yale, by contrast, remembers its six Confederate alumni who died in that war, on the same memorial with 10 Union casualties at Woolsey Hall.)''

The absolute disgrace with which the late British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain acceded to so many demands of Adolf Hitler – and then returned to England and declared: "We shall have peace in our time!" – will never be forgotten.
But what seems to have been largely forgotten is the similar detestable obeisance to Naziism paid by numerous leaders of leading U.S. universities. This everlasting disgrace has now been monumentally reported by a Ph.D. from the Ivy League's Columbia University, Stephen H. Norwood, who is professor of history at the University of Oklahoma.
Dr. Norwood's new book, "The Third Reich in the Ivory Tower," published by Cambridge University Press, is a carefully detailed and devastating written indictment of many of our nation's college leaders.
But the most extensive of this book's many exposes are those of our nation's oldest and best-known university, Harvard.
I strongly recommend reading of this detailed set of historical accusations – and I recall that five years ago, after reading initial reports of professor Norwood's research and contacting him by telephone, I wrote a column for WorldNetDaily, which I also broadcast.
A copy of this column and broadcast, headlined, "Letter to the president of Harvard," was registered-mailed to Harvard's then-president, Dr. Lawrence Summers, before it was either published or broadcast.
President Summers declined to provide any response whatsoever, despite his personal invitation to me to write him.
Among the issues raised in that letter of Nov. 23, 2004, to President Summers, who during halftime of that year's Yale-Harvard football game asked me to write him a letter about the questions I asked him on that football field, were:
What the Boston Globe on Nov. 14 headlined as: "Harvard's stance on Nazis question: Historian calls '30s record 'shameful.'" This expose, I learned, was picked up and reported by major dailies and talk radio nationwide; and
What the Globe and none of these major media have yet reported about Harvard's memorial tablets to its alumni killed during World Wars I and II.
Harvard's World War I memorial contains the names of two alumni who lost their lives serving in the German Army of the Kaiser. Following their names is, in parenthesis, the word "Enemy."
This same designation of "Enemy" follows the name of a one-time Harvard Divinity School student who was killed on the Russian front after being drafted to serve in Adolf Hitler's Wehrmacht.
If it is fitting and proper to so remember Harvard alumni who were our country's German enemies, why is there no such memorial to more than 60 Harvard alumni who served in the armies of the Confederate States of America? (Yale, by contrast, remembers its six Confederate alumni who died in that war, on the same memorial with 10 Union casualties at Woolsey Hall.)
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=119736
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

'Healthcare reform is not about the public's health. It's about Obama's ego'

'Healthcare reform is not about the public's health. It's about Obama's ego'


''What does calling this medical care legislation "historic" mean? It means that previous administrations gave up the idea when it became clear that the voting public did not want government control of medical care. What is "historic" is that this will be the first administration to show that it doesn't care one bit what the public wants or doesn't want.''

The only thing healthy about Congress' health insurance
legislation is the healthy skepticism about it by most of the public, as revealed by polls. What is most unhealthy about this legislation is the raw arrogance in the way it was conceived and passed.
Supporters of
government health insurance call its passage "historic." Past attempts to pass such legislation – going back for decades – failed repeatedly. But now both houses of Congress have passed government health-care legislation, and it is just a question of reconciling their respective bills and presenting President Obama with a political "victory."
In short, this is not about improving the health of the American people. It is about passing something – anything – to keep the Obama administration from ending up with egg on its face by being unable to pass a bill, after so much hype and hoopla. Politically, looking impotent is a formula for disaster at election time. Far better to pass even bad legislation that will not actually go into effect until after the 2012 presidential election, so that the public will not know whether it makes medical care better or worse until it is too late for the voters to hold the administration accountable.
The utter cynicism of this has been apparent from the outset, in the rush to pass a health-care bill in a hurry, to meet wholly arbitrary, self-imposed deadlines. First it was supposed to be passed before the August 2009 congressional recess. Then it was supposed to be passed before Labor Day. When that didn't happen, it was supposed to be rushed to passage before Christmas.
Why – especially since the legislation would not take effect until years from now?
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=120365
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dear Dave Ramsey: Lowball offers?

Dear Dave Ramsey: Lowball offers?


Dear Dave,
My husband and I are looking at getting a second vehicle. We found one we like, and it's in great shape, but they're asking more than we can afford to pay. Do you have any suggestions on how to make a low offer without insulting someone?

Angela

Dear Angela,
This is a really good question, and I think you're smart to want to stay on the seller's good side. You want to be classy and diplomatic. Never point out the bad things about an item someone's selling just to drive down the price. You're liable to blow the whole deal right off the bat if you insult their merchandise or insinuate the price is unfair.
What if you try something like this? Tell them it's
a fine vehicle, and their price is fair, but the amount they're asking is outside your budget. Let them know that you want to work out a deal, and for it to fit into your lifestyle, you can only pay a certain amount. You might throw in that a lot of people are selling things right now because of the economy, and you're just looking for the best deal.
Who knows? Maybe that and letting them know you're standing there with
money in hand will help swing this thing in your favor!
Dave



Dave Ramsey is a nationally syndicated radio talk-show host and best-selling author. His life experience gives him an unusually deep perspective and insight into life and money matters.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Left Turn: We’ll All Be Terrorists

Left Turn: We’ll All Be Terrorists


''This corruption of our legal system, if history is any guide, will not be reserved by the state for suspected terrorists, or even Muslim Americans. In the coming turmoil and economic collapse, it will be used to silence all who are branded as disruptive or subversive. Hashmi endures what many others, who are not Muslim, will endure later. Radical activists in the environmental, globalization, anti-nuclear, sustainable agriculture and anarchist movements—who are already being placed by the state in special detention facilities with Muslims charged with terrorism—have discovered that his fate is their fate.''

Syed Fahad Hashmi can tell you about the dark heart of America. He knows that our First Amendment rights have become a joke, that habeas corpus no longer exists and that we torture, not only in black sites such as those at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan or at Guantánamo Bay, but also at the federal Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) in Lower Manhattan. Hashmi is a U.S. citizen of Muslim descent imprisoned on two counts of providing and conspiring to provide material support and two counts of making and conspiring to make a contribution of goods or services to al-Qaida. As his case prepares for trial, his plight illustrates that the gravest threat we face is not from Islamic extremists, but the codification of draconian procedures that deny Americans basic civil liberties and due process. Hashmi would be a better person to tell you this, but he is not allowed to speak. http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/
one_day_well_all_be_terrorists_20091228/
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

From May 2009: North Korea, Iran and You

North Korea, Iran and You





Report: Pyongyang also test-fires short-range missile...SKorea military forms crisis team...Japan says test 'unacceptable'...U.S. 'gravely concerned'...Obama says actions 'threat to international peace'...Britain: 'Breach' of UN resolutions...Asian markets rattled...

POLL: Half of Israelis back immediate strike on Iran...
Iran general says could stop Israel in 'one strike'...

I SAY: This is the plan for 'de-nuking' Iran. It includes a large-scale air assault employing both conventional and tactical nuclear weapons. Within Iran there are more than 450 major strategic targets, including numerous suspected nuclear-weapons-program development sites. Many of the targets are hardened or are deep underground and could not be taken out by conventional weapons. Besides the political cost, there is the cost to rebuild Iran's infrastructure. The benefits: A defused Middle East and Islam learns respect.

As for North Korea: If your 'Dear Leader' wants to play with nuclear weapons, the United States(and the United States only) should show him it's done. Again, tactical nukes, delivered via submarine. Finished except for the political fallout. The benefits. Japan and China get to be more productive.

Ann Coulter in 2004 said:

Nuke North Korea?

"Right—and this is tied to my point that, in Iraq, let the Marines do their job. There may be some civilian casualties—that’s known as war. Americans can live with that. And when did we become the guardian of the world to prevent all civilian casualties, ever—how about our civilians?"

After we bomb North Korea, what’s the next country we should invade?

"Iran. Though that’s the beauty part of Iraq: It may well not be necessary. Because precisely what I’m saying with nuking North Korea—despite that wonderful peace deal Madeline Albright negotiated with the North Koreans, six seconds before they feverishly began developing nuclear weapons. They’re a major threat. I just think it would be fun to nuke them and have it be a warning to the rest of the world."

I'll leave you today with two questions...

What will happen if North Korea nukes Japan?

What will happen if Iran nukes Israel??

I think you know the answer.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Janet Nappy lists a list

Janet Nappy lists a list

How about a list of guys who like to bomb airliners?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Nearly 2 of 3 expect terror trials to spark attack

Nearly 2 of 3 expect terror trials to spark attack


''Among members of the GOP 85 percent believe such an attack is somewhat or very likely and more than 57 percent of independents felt the same only.''

Nearly two out of three Americans expect another new terror attack to accompany the New York City court trials for detainees who are suspects in the 9/11 attacks in 2001, according to a new poll from Fritz Wenzel of Wenzel Strategies.
"The fear of retribution from terrorists is very real all across America, the survey shows. Nearly two out of every three respondents – 61 percent – said they think it is likely that New York City will experience a terrorist attack, either before, during, or immediately after the terrorist trials," Wenzel said.
"Just 28 percent said they thought it was unlikely that such an attack would occur. In a year that saw President Obama's job approval rating move from 69 percent positive the day after he took office to just 41 percent positive in this survey, this has got to be seen as one of the reasons. Obama has pursued an agenda that has been opposed by a majority of Americans since their announcement, and as he continues to push them through to fruition, the American public is responding with unprecedented negativity," he said.
The WND/Wenzel telephone survey was conducted Dec. 18-21 using an automated telephone technology calling a random sampling of listed telephone numbers. The survey included 26 questions and carries a 95 percent confidence interval. It included 823 likely voters. It carries a margin of error of 3.4 percentage points.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=119902
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive