About Me

Name: Miguel Diocuore...
Email: mikecorthell@roadrunner.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

The ever-changing Obama nativity story

Posted by Miguel Diocuore Ph.D. on Friday, October 30, 2009 10:22:56 AM

The ever-changing Obama nativity story


''Let's face it: If Michelle and Barack Obama can't even get their stories straight about the marital status of his parents, why should we simply accept that they were his parents? Why should we accept the official story of where he was born? Why should we accept that he is constitutionally eligible to serve as president as a natural born citizen? Why isn't everyone, including those who like Barack Obama, demanding that he address this question head-on and lay out the proof for the American people?''

In another month or so, millions will be reading the Nativity story – the one so well-chronicled by gospel-writer Luke.
It's amazing to me that the details of a birth that took place nearly 2,000 years ago are so precise – complete with genealogical records dating back eons.
Yet, today, even the most basic birth information about the man occupying arguably the most powerful office in the world is murky – and ever-changing.
Nevertheless, if you dare to ask questions about Barack Obama's birth, even questions about facts required to establish his constitutional eligibility for office, you will be pilloried, ridiculed, written off as a wacko, characterized as a "fringe" extremist, even labeled a "racist."
What raises this issue for me, again, is the fact that even Barack and Michelle Obama are telling two entirely contradictory stories about his birth – and even this raises no questions in the minds of uniformly unquestioning media types.
In case you missed it, Michelle Obama stated at a public event last year during the campaign that Barack Obama's mother was unmarried when she gave birth.
Now, I don't really care, except for the fact that Barack Obama has told a different story – in his autobiography and elsewhere.
Is it important in and of itself? No.
But what's important to note is that there is no documentation
to ascertain the facts.
And that's what the so-called "birther" issue is all about. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=114410
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sinbama and the Forty Thieves

Posted by Miguel Diocuore Ph.D. on Friday, October 30, 2009 10:22:22 AM

Sinbama and the Forty Thieves


''It's like the schoolyard bully claiming that it was really his victim who bullied him. The bullies at the Kremlin House in Washington, of course, are all too aware that Fox is really the only station that is actually reporting the news, while the fringe media (ABC, CBS and NBC), along with CNBC and MSNBC, are going to great lengths to keep their viewers in the dark about what is really happening – particularly in Washington.''

Those commentators on Fox News who like to play it down the middle keep saying that they believe BHO's strategy of trying to marginalize the most successful TV network in the country is unwise. Unwise? They've been inside the Beltway too long.
The Duplicitous Despot and his criminal minions – most notably David Axelrod, Rahm Emanuel, Anita Dunn, and Mark Lloyd – are out to shut down Fox News. No subtlety about it. They take seriously Mao's belief that political power grows out of the barrel of a gun. After all, Anita Bandita looks to Chairman Mao when it comes to her philosophical inspiration.
When you watch certain commentators (whom I shall purposely leave unnamed) on Fox, it's not hard to understand why there are still millions of people sleepwalking down the road to servitude. I just shake my head in amazement when I hear them – after more than nine months of nonstop treason by the White House and Congress – talk about BHO as though he's just another one of those naïve, misguided, liberal presidents.
As Bill O'Reilly (oops … slipped) often says, "If Obama does (this or that), he's toast. It will be the end of his presidency." The thought of a dictatorship being established before 2012 would be a comical idea to the host of such intellectual fare as "body language expert" Tonya Reiman and the Great American Culture Quiz.
Discover the truth about the intimidation tactics used by today's White House in Whistleblower magazine's "MOB RULE: Under Obama, Chicago-style bullying and intimidation go nationwide"
Worse, when Glenn Beck appears as a guest on "The O'Reilly Factor," fair-and-balanced Bill loves to chuckle and refer to him (jocularly, of course) as a "troublemaker." Beck is in an awkward position. Either by design or by accident, O'Reilly embraced him even before he came to Fox News, which makes Beck beholden to him. He's walking a tightrope, and I don't blame him for not wanting to upstage O'Reilly, who already is regularly out-brained by the likes of Laura Ingraham, Monica Crowley and Megyn Kelly.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Liberal love for evil leaders

Posted by Miguel Diocuore Ph.D. on Friday, October 30, 2009 10:21:39 AM

Liberal love for evil leaders


''The answer is that they identify with tyrants. They don't oppose gulags on principle; they simply don't wish to be sent to one. That doesn't mean they wouldn't like to run one. They also have a soft spot for dictators because they, themselves, are miserable excuses for human beings who look down on the masses as being ignorant, religious peons who, in a just world, would exist only to serve as organ donors.''

Back when I was a kid, the two major fears in America revolved around polio and communism. Because the first disease was so prevalent and so often fatal prior to the miraculous cures wrought by Dr. Albert Sabin and Dr. Jonas Salk, neither of whom managed to garner a Nobel Prize for their heroic efforts, children were kept out of public swimming pools and were discouraged from having too much physical activity. It's a wonder that our entire generation didn't grow up to be hypochondriacs because if you were even slightly fatigued or had an aching back or a stiff neck, anguished parents started measuring you for an iron lung.
The second disease, communism, created its own form of hysteria. During the late '40s and early '50s, we had A-bomb drills in public schools. We grammar-school kids were led to believe that in case the Russians hit L.A. with an atomic bomb, we would be safe so long as we dropped to the floor and huddled beneath our desks with our hands clasped tightly behind our necks. As everyone knows, there's nothing better than tiny hands to ward off the effects of atomic radiation. To this day, I wonder who came up with that particular brainstorm.
On the off-chance that the Russkies elected not to vaporize us, a lot of people were convinced that the plan to prevent tooth decay by introducing fluoride into our reservoirs was a Commie plot. The fluoride, we were warned, would turn our brains to mush and make us easy prey for the Soviet Menace. It's taken about 60 years, but I am now convinced that the scaremongers were right. How else to explain American liberals except by accepting that the Commies contaminated our water supply?
The fact that most Americans haven't turned into brain-dead zombies muttering "hope … change … hope … change" like those scary creatures in horror movies only goes to prove that people have different tolerances to tainted water, just as they do to alcohol, various viruses and Barack Obama's voice.
I mean, seriously, when Obama, during the campaign, spoke about judging him by the people he surrounded himself with, he pointed to Richard Lugar, Joe Biden and Warren Buffett, while drawing the curtain on Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers and Rashid Khalidi. These days, though, he surrounds himself with such visitors from a strange planet as Van Jones, Kevin Jennings and Cass Sunstein. I'm just wondering if it's still OK for us to judge him by his associates.
The MSM likened Obama to Abe Lincoln. I guess their confusion was caused by both men being skinny and from Illinois. One major, rather obvious difference, though, is that Lincoln waged a war to preserve the Union. Obama, on the other hand, would go to war to preserve such unions as the SEIU and the UAW.
Liberals get all in a tizzy when they're accused of hypocrisy, but it's hard to escape the fact that while arguing for the redistribution of wealth, you never see such kazillionaires as George Soros, Dianne Feinstein, Jay Rockefeller, Charles Schumer or John Kerry redistributing any of theirs or even paying a penny more in taxes than is absolutely required. And, as we discovered when he was putting his administration together, Obama's friends and colleagues quite often try to avoid paying any taxes at all. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=114412
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sting: Obama is 'sent from God'

Posted by Miguel Diocuore Ph.D. on Friday, October 30, 2009 7:18:44 AM

Sting: Obama is 'sent from God'


''OBAMA BE THY NAMETHY CHANGE WILL COMETHY WILL BE DONE ...''

British recording artist Sting says President Barack Obama could be the answer to the world's problems – the divine answer.
"In many ways, he's sent from God, because the world's a mess," he said in a new interview with the Associated Press.
The comments from The Police's lead singer, whose real name is Gordon Sumner, are just the latest in a long series of statements suggesting Obama's connection to the supernatural.
WND previously reported when an artist who planned to unveil a portrait of Obama in a Christ-like pose with a crown of thorns upon his brow canceled the event, due to "overwhelming public outrage." Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan also was clear in a nearly religious adoration of Obama. As WND reported, Farrakhan declared last year that when Obama talks, "the Messiah is absolutely speaking."
Addressing a large crowd behind a podium with a Nation of Islam Saviours' Day 2008 sign, Farrakhan proclaimed, "You are the instruments that God is going to use to bring about universal change, and that is why Barack has captured the youth. And he has involved young people in a political process that they didn't care anything about. That's a sign. When the Messiah speaks, the youth will hear, and the Messiah is absolutely speaking."
Farrakhan pointed out that the man Nation of Islam followers refer to as "the Saviour," Fard Muhammad, had a black father and a white mother, just as Obama did.
"A black man with a white mother became a saviour to us," he said. "A black man with a white mother could turn out to be one who can lift America from her fall."
WND also previously reported a website called "Is Barack Obama the Messiah?" capturing the wave of euphoria that followed the Democratic senator's remarkable rise. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=114422
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Muslim congressman defends CAIR

Posted by Miguel Diocuore Ph.D. on Friday, October 30, 2009 7:17:46 AM

Muslim congressman defends CAIR

Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn.

''U.S. prosecutors believe CAIR, while claiming to be a civil-rights group, is actually a front group for Hamas and other terrorists. The Justice Department stated in September 2007 during its prosecution of the Holy Land Foundation in Dallas – the largest terror-financing case in history – that CAIR "has been identified by the government at trial as a participant in an ongoing and ultimately unlawful conspiracy to support a designated terrorist organization, a conspiracy from which CAIR never withdrew."

A Muslim congressman says there is no need to investigate interns who may be placed with members of strategic security committees by the Council on American-Islamic Relations.
Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., who took his oath of office holding his hand on a Quran instead of a Bible and had CAIR staff members working on his campaign, read a statement in Congress criticizing the call for an investigation.
Lawmakers John Shadegg, R-Ariz.; Sue Myrick, R-N.C.; Paul Broun, R-Ga.; and Trent Franks, R-Ariz., earlier asked the House sergeant at arms to investigate whether the D.C.-based Muslim group carried out its plan, revealed in the book "Muslim Mafia" by Dave Gaubatz and Paul Sperry.
In another letter, this one to Attorney General Eric Holder, the House members asked the Justice Department to reveal to Congress members why CAIR was listed as an unindicted co-conspirator in the largest terror-finance case in U.S. history. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=114435
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bad to the Bone

Posted by Miguel Diocuore Ph.D. on Friday, October 30, 2009 7:13:39 AM

Which media source do you trust most? this is a poll

 

 

Time for the GOP to buff some balls


Did you ever imagine that men — who created, fought and died for, and built America — would one day comprise a special-interest group (SIG)? Stop imagining. That day is today.
Judging by how they view themselves, and, consequently, how women view them, men are neither special nor of much interest to America. Accordingly, this so-called “group” is, in reality, hollow and nonexistent and, therefore, trivial.
Typically, SIGs organize, raise money, and fight to coerce spineless politicians to subvert the US Constitution to create unilateral rights and privileges. Result? Unconstitutional laws such as the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) and the newly enacted
Hate Crimes Prevention Act — which, some argue, could have allowed the feds to nullify North Carolina’s decision to forgive three innocent men in the Duke Lacrosse Case.
Obama’s Macho Window Dressing
Women keep playing oppressed victims when, clearly, they aren’t: Maria Shriver declared America a Woman’s Nation. Yet, they endlessly seek unilateral legal dominance when the Constitution, as written and amended, gives them everything they need. Why? Simple: because they can. They know that, whenever women cry foul, men buckle.
In the past week, feminists accused Barack Obama of running a boys’ club within the White House — because he frequently shoots hoops and plays golf only with male colleagues and friends. Big freaking deal. His “boys’ club,” a mere retreat from self-imposed subordination to women, is macho window dressing.

Sinbama and the Forty Thieves

Liberal love for evil leaders''They also have a soft spot for dictators because they, themselves, are miserable excuses for human beings who look down on the masses as being ignorant, religious peons who, in a just world, would exist only to serve as organ donors.''

   

 

 

 

United Nations, Death and Population Control  “The lowest strata are reproducing too fast. Therefore…they must not have too easy access to relief or hospital treatment lest the removal of the last check on natural selection should make it too easy for children to be produced or to survive long unemployment should be a ground for sterilization.” - Julian Huxley

 

 

 
Ask the Editor
 
  • Bad to the bone
  • Socialized medicine? You betcha
  • United Nations, Death and Population Control
  • Time for the GOP to buff some balls
  • FoxNews to drop Newt Gingrich?
  • Climate cult used to facilitate Global Governance
  • The ever-changing Obama nativity story
  • Sinbama and the Forty Thieves
  • Liberal love for evil leaders
  • Sting: Obama is 'sent from God'
  • Muslim congressman defends CAIR
  • Scare a lib for Halloween
  • Holy Teat, ACORN is Back!

    •  

    Bad to the bone

    So many of you have been boned by the government this year, you should have no trouble handing some out to these cute goblins.
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Personal responsibility and personal accountability

    Posted by Miguel Diocuore Ph.D. on Thursday, October 29, 2009 6:36:48 PM

    Personal responsibility and personal accountability


    ''Before 1960, Americans enjoyed a high degree of personal responsibility and personal accountability. Most graduated from high school and could read, write and work mathematical equations. No matter how poor or how illiterate, Americans worked to put food on the table. But after Lyndon Baines Johnson’s “Great Society” erupted with free food, free housing, free medical, food stamps and a host of ‘get something for nothing’, American culture for minorities changed and then, it changed for whites in America, too.''

    Following up the two part series on “U.S. Filling Up with Dumb People”, an amazing number of emails arrived with a sense of heart break, distress and futility. Older Americans seem to think that America can return to the way it was! Younger Americans don’t have a clue as to the way it used to be! Immigrant Americans don’t know what America once was nor do they care about what we are becoming. They don’t know the difference.
    Immigrants celebrate being here rather than being where they came from because where they came from can only be described as miserable enough to flee. Please be advised that over 10 million people wait in line to move to America and their numbers grow by 77 million annually. But as more and more of them arrive, they turn our country into the same chaos they left in their countries. Example: California!
    As we change our language to many languages, as we change our ethnic makeup to a majority of Mexican-Americans and Muslim-Americans by 2042, (Source: PEW Research) as we change our dominant Christian religion that built this country—into a multicultural morass, as we lower our standards in education, culture and personal accountability—America will never again enjoy its exceptional past.
    This quote bears repeating as it applies to America. In Dr. Otis Graham’s “Unguarded Gates: A History of America’s Immigration Crisis”, he writes, “Most Western elites continue urging the wealthy West not to stem the migrant tide, but to absorb our global brothers and sisters until their horrid ordeal has been endured and shared by all--ten billion humans packed onto an ecologically devastated planet.”     http://www.newswithviews.com/Wooldridge/frosty513.htm
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Hey, all you fuzzy socialists!(I mean liberals)

    Posted by Miguel Diocuore Ph.D. on Thursday, October 29, 2009 6:36:08 PM

    Hey, all you fuzzy socialists!


    Excuse Me, I Mean LIBERALS

    Fuzzy, socialist-liberals — What useful idiots you are for the Obama's of this world. You always accuse free-market advocates like me of being "mean," or not having any Christian ideals. Well, let's see. What would a good Christian want for his fellow man? — for people to live happy, productive lives, to not be slaves of any dictatorial government, to have the chance to fulfill their hopes and dreams, to not have to live in poverty and misery, to be charitable to their fellow man, right?
    ''You can be whatever you want to be in a free market if you have the gumption and perseverance to do so. Use your intelligence to be more successful and reach your highest potential.''

    Now lets compare the vicious liberal/socialist system you so love to the "evil" capitalist system that you knee-jerk denigrate:
    1 — The socialist/communist/fascist countries of Nazi Germany that ruled in the 20th century and today were responsible for the murder of over 100 million people, and the torture, slow starvation, political enslavement, and violation of basic human rights for the vast majority of the citizen/slaves living under these anti-human regimes (Remember, the NAZI party letters stood for 'National SOCIALIST party', for those who know little history, and claim I confuse socialism with fascism. Mussolini was the first fascist dictator prior to World War II, but his party was the Socialist party of Italy).
    2 — Capitalism, even though not perfect because no economic system created by human beings can be perfect, in every country in which it flourished, dramatically raised the standard of living for the hundreds of millions of people living under a capitalist or semi-capitalist system. Of course, America is the prime example of this. In the course of 150 years, capitalism in America raised the standard of living of hundreds of millions of Americas to levels undreamed of by humankind for the past 5000 years. It gave average Americans the right and the chance to live a prosperous, decent life, to fulfill their potential and dreams, to see their children constantly do better than they did, to have personal liberty that no country on Earth in the last 5000 years ever gave its citizens. America was a miracle of liberty and prosperity, not for the governing power elite, but for the average man and woman.     http://www.newswithviews.com/Turtel/joel162.htm
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Exit an era, welcome a new

    Posted by Miguel Diocuore Ph.D. on Thursday, October 29, 2009 6:35:22 PM

    Exit an era, welcome a new


    ''Marxism? No one can any longer take Marx seriously, even though Marxism, in diluted form, continues to influence Western politics. As for Christianity, its doctrine of separation of church and state, once salutary, now precludes Christianity from having architectonic influence on contemporary society.''

    We are approaching the end of an era. Politics and democracy have entered their terminal stage. Party government has become nothing more than a struggle for power, and parliaments are but arenas of self-aggrandizement. This was inevitable. It was inevitable because, in its modern conception, democracy separated morality and politics, just as Christianity separated religion and state. Hence, egoism—even in principle, let alone in practice—was bound to supplant family values and the common good.
    Democracy has fulfilled its historical function. Its two cardinal principles, freedom and equality, liberated the acquisitive instincts, facilitated the conquest of nature, alleviated widespread toil and poverty, and opened the door to talents. But while men and women in democratic societies enjoy unprecedented freedom and equality as well as material abundance, a frightful number find their lives lonely and meaningless. The reason is not far to seek: democracy is the dissolver of ideologies, of traditional beliefs and norms of behavior which alone can sustain individual freedom along with national solidarity and ethical purpose.
    The decency and civility still visible in contemporary democracy have nothing to do with democracy itself. They derive from the morality of the Bible now under attack by the atheism and nihilism permeating academia. Neither democratic equality nor democratic freedom provides any moral standards as to how man should live. What is there about democratic equality that would prompt a person to defer to wisdom or to show respect for teachers or parents? What is there about democratic freedom that would prompt him to restrain his passions, to be kind, honest, or just?     http://www.newswithviews.com/Eidelberg/paul122.htm
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    A glorious day

    Posted by Miguel Diocuore Ph.D. on Thursday, October 29, 2009 6:34:47 PM

    A glorious day


    ''It was a glorious day because it revealed the lack of mettle the administration has; it revealed the extent of their paternalism and arrogance where the establishment press is concerned; and gave the latter pause that is tantamount to a loss of political currency for Obama.''

    Friday, Oct. 23, 2009, was a glorious day. On that day it was reported that the Obama administration had failed in a significant effort in the area of the autocratic tactics it has employed since Barack Obama took office, and far more increasingly in recent weeks.
    I am speaking of the administration's attempt to maneuver establishment news organizations into segregating the Fox News     network
    from the press corps. On Thursday of last week, the administration planned to allow members of the White House press pool to conduct interviews with "pay czar" Kenneth Feinberg. The pool is a group of five rotating network news organizations that is ostensibly representative of the press at large, and traditionally has shared the expense and function of covering the president.
    The White House's intention was that all members of the White     House press pool would be allowed to participate in the interviews with Feinberg – all, that is, except for Fox News.
    As the reader may be aware, the Obama administration has been waging what can only be considered a one-sided (albeit vigorous) war of words against Fox. On Oct. 18, White     House senior adviser David Axelrod said (on ABC News' "This Week" program) that Fox News is not a real news organization, and that other news networks ought not treat it as such. A broad hint, to be sure, if not a threat; on the same day, White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel made similar remarks during his appearance on CNN's "State of the Union" news show.
    But, despite the establishment press' heretofore slavish devotion to Obama, the tactic backfired. The bureau chiefs of the pool networks asserted that none of their reporters would participate (in the interviews with Feinberg) unless Fox News was allowed to do so.
    Discover the truth about the intimidation tactics used by today's White House in Whistleblower magazine's "MOB RULE: Under Obama, Chicago-style bullying and intimidation go nationwide"
    And the administration gave in.     http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=114314
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Fight the 'Muslim Mafia' media blackout

    Posted by Miguel Diocuore Ph.D. on Thursday, October 29, 2009 6:34:08 PM

    Fight the 'Muslim Mafia' media blackout


    ''Now, let me ask you a question: Have you read any of this elsewhere? Have you heard any of this discussed on major talk-radio shows? Have you seen any of this reported on network, cable or local television?''

    You may have missed this.
    Unless you are an avid WND reader, you almost certainly have.
    As a result of a daring undercover operation lasting six months, a Muslim Brotherhood front group – one already identified by the U.S. Justice Department as an unindicted terrorist co-conspirator – has been revealed as an active front for jihadist activity.
    This group, the Council on American Islamic Relations, still sports a 501(c)3 tax-exemption from the Internal Revenue Service. It still has broad access to the "mainstream" media. And it boasts about lobbying the Congress of the United States, though such activities are strictly limited by its tax-exempt status.
    Despite the following well-documented findings of this undercover investigation in which thousands of incriminating internal documents were collected, not one major news agency besides WND has picked up the voluminous stories revealed in     "Muslim Mafia: Inside the Secret Underworld That's Conspiring to Islamize America":
    CAIR is trying to spring from prison a former headquarters official who trained for jihad with the same Pakistani terrorist group that last year massacred more than 150 people in Mumbai, India.
    CAIR officials are secretly coaching terrorism suspects and witnesses to withhold information from FBI investigators and have successfully obstructed at least one investigation in Maryland.
    CAIR is donating thousands of dollars to the legal defense fund of a Muslim cop killer.
    CAIR's visitor logs show the father of an al-Qaida terrorist visited CAIR director Nihad Awad several months before he was convicted of plotting to assassinate President Bush.
    Curiously, the logs do not register any guests around Sept. 11, 2001 – in fact, the entire month of September is blank.
    CAIR has cultivated Muslim moles inside a Washington-area law enforcement agency, including one who illegally accessed FBI records to tip off a terrorist under investigation and another with ties to Pakistani intelligence.
    A long-time CAIR advisory board member and top fundraiser has preached violent insurrection, including calling on street gangs to lead an "Uzi" jihad in America's cities.
    Another imam whom CAIR frequently books to speak at its events has exhorted Muslims to hijack U.S. military aircraft, including C-130s transporting the elite 82nd Airborne paratroopers out of Fort Bragg – which happens to be part of the district represented by North Carolina state Sen. Larry Shaw, who this year took over the reins of CAIR as its new chairman.
    CAIR is putting books into neighborhood libraries across the country advising men to beat their wives – but only "lightly" – when they disobey them.
    CAIR is lobbying the Justice Department and local law enforcement to exempt Muslim wife-beaters from laws against domestic violence or at least look the other way and let Muslim clerics intervene when Muslims are involved in spousal battery cases – not unlike the one involving the prominent Muslim TV executive who ended up beheading his wife after serial domestic abuse.
    CAIR's library package includes a guide to Islam edited by a radical Muslim cleric who cheered the tragic space shuttle Columbia disaster as a "good omen" for Islam and is now behind bars for inciting anti-U.S. warfare.     http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=114296
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Invent a new one premised on all the bad ideas?

    Posted by Miguel Diocuore Ph.D. on Thursday, October 29, 2009 6:33:24 PM

    Invent a new one premised on all the bad ideas?


    ''As the kids say: Duh.''

    The Democrats' all-new "opt out" idea for health-care reform is the latest fig leaf for a total government takeover of the health-care system.
    Democrats tell us they've been trying to nationalize health care for 65 years, but the first anyone heard of the "opt out" provision was about a week ago. They keep changing the language so people can't figure out what's going on.
    The most important fact about the "opt out" scheme allegedly allowing states to decline government health insurance is that a state can't "opt out" of paying for it. All 50 states will pay for it. A state legislature can only opt out of allowing its own citizens to receive the benefits of a federal program they're paying for.
    It's like a movie theater offering a "money back guarantee" and then explaining, you don't get your money back, but you don't have to stay and watch the movie if you don't like it. That's not what most people are thinking when they hear the words "opt out." The term more likely to come to mind is "scam."
    While congressional Democrats act indignant that Republicans would intransigently oppose a national     health care plan that now magnanimously allows states to "opt out," other liberals are being cockily honest about the "opt out" scheme.
    It's not too late to rescue the nation! Read how in "Save America Now! The New Revolution to Save Freedom and Liberty"
    On the Huffington Post, the first sentence of the article on the opt-out plan is: "The public option lives."     http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=114319
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Monsters among us

    Posted by Miguel Diocuore Ph.D. on Thursday, October 29, 2009 6:32:51 PM

    Monsters among us


    ''It's very fashionable in some "tough on crime" circles to agitate for forced chemical castration of sex-offenders, as if the way to make our children safe from societal predators is simply to deny them access to the biological equipment necessary to commit crime. The fact is, nothing less than a cordless drill to the brain – to let the evil spirits out, let's say – will truly remove from a murderous child molester the urge to victimize little boys and little girls.''

    Her name is Somer Thompson. She was 7 years old. She's dead.
    In her last minutes of life, this beautiful little girl suffered inhuman acts of brutality. She was taken and murdered by one of the monsters who live and work among us – one of the pieces of human debris, the living mounds of filth, who are allowed to breathe the same air, live in the same apartment buildings and work the same jobs as genuine human beings. They look like us, but they're not human at all; they're animals who walk on two legs, with hearts full of black emptiness and minds full of perversion and violence.
    Somer Thompson disappeared a week ago last Monday. She left school to walk home and was never seen alive again. By Wednesday of last week,     ABC News was reporting that the density of registered sex offenders living within walking distance of Somer's home is so great that "when their homes are represented by pins on a digital map they create a cluster so thick it overlaps in places." On Thursday, searchers found Somer's body in a Georgia landfill. By Friday, authorities had interrogated and ruled out as suspects all 161 sex offenders living in a five-mile radius of the house that will never again feel like a home to Somer Thompson's parents.
    Let me write that out: There are ONE HUNDRED SIXTY-ONE sex offenders living within five miles of this little girl's house. What's more, that density of legally registered perverts, child molesters, rapists, flashers and whatever else, is considered average. ABC quoted a Florida lawyer named Ron Book, a legal activist who fights for stricter sex-offense laws. "In spite of appearing ... to be a lot, that's about average. Some areas have hundreds of offenders."
    Thanks to the miracle of technology, many new parents now experience the dubious honor of a new rite of passage in our society. When they are pregnant or shortly after their children are born, they visit various websites online that inform them of exactly where and who are the sex offenders in their neighborhoods. You, too, can obtain a map of these unctuous, contemptible creatures in your own neighborhood.
    DVD shows how "the father of the sexual revolution" has endangered our children and our culture – "The Kinsey Syndrome"
    Just browse to     familywatchdog.us, enter your address, and prepare to be horrified. You'll get a scattering Christmas-tree pattern of colored squares overlaid on a map of your target address. Clicking these squares will give you pictures, names, work addresses – complete dossiers, really – of the monsters lurking among you. There are other sites, too, such as your state's offender registry, that you can check. For example, I'm a New Yorker. My state lists sex offenders by county and risk level and allows you to search that registry by name and location. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=114301
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Obama signs 'hate-crimes' bill into law

    Posted by Miguel Diocuore Ph.D. on Thursday, October 29, 2009 6:32:16 PM

    Obama signs 'hate-crimes' bill into law


    'It's a very sad day for America and for religious liberties'

    A "hate crimes" bill opponents claim will be used to crack down on Christian speech, even the reading of the Bible, was signed into law today by President Obama.
    The Senate approved the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act by a vote of 68-29 on Oct. 22 after Democrats strategically attached it to a "must-pass" $680 billion defense appropriations plan.
    Most Republicans, although normally strong supporters of the U.S. military, opposed the bill because it hands out federal money to states and local governments in pursuit of "preventing" hate crimes. The bill creates federal protections and privileges for homosexuals and other alternative lifestyles but denies those protections to other groups of citizens.
    Obama signed the 2010 National Defense Authorization Act at a White House ceremony today. Prior to signing the act into law, Obama spoke briefly of the hate crimes bill.
    "After more than a decade, we've passed inclusive hate-crimes legislation to help protect our citizens from violence based on what they look like, who they love, how they pray or who they are," he said. "I promised Judy Shepard when she saw me in the Oval Office that this day would come, and I'm glad that she and her husband, Dennis, could join us for this event. I'm also honored to have the family of the late Sen. Ted Kennedy who fought so hard for this legislation. I just want you all to know how proud we are of the work that Ted did to help make this day possible."
    American Family Association President Tim Wildmon warned that the new law "creates a kind of caste system in law enforcement, where the perverse thing is that people who engage in non-normative sexual behavior will have more legal protection than heterosexuals. This kind of inequality before the law is simply un-American."
    Wildmon said the legislation creates possible situations where pastors may be arrested if their sermons on sexuality can be linked in even the remotest way to acts of violence.
    "It threatens free speech and freedom of religion and is totally unacceptable," he said.     http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=114305
    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

    Companies get even 'gayer' as U.S. economy decays

    Posted by Miguel Diocuore Ph.D. on Thursday, October 29, 2009 10:39:55 AM

    Companies get even 'gayer' as U.S. economy decays


    Firms with pro-homosexual policies continue steady increase in number
    Despite an economy languishing in high unemployment and low consumer confidence, more American companies are jumping on the bandwagon to provide support for homosexual and transgender employees.
    More than 300 firms have now received perfect 100 percent scores in this fall's     Corporate Equality Index, produced annually by the Human Rights Campaign which ranks businesses on their "treatment" of employees who have chosen homosexual, lesbian, bisexual and transgender lifestyles
    .
    The list, which saw a 20 percent increase this year in the number of perfect scores, includes newcomers such as theater giant     AMC Entertainment, Costco, Delta Air Lines, Food Lion and General Mills.
    "Even in the most challenging economy, leading     employers are forging ahead of federal and state law to recruit and retain a diverse workforce – regardless of employees' sexual orientation and gender identity or expression," said Joe Solmonese, president of the HRC. "While Congress considers a federal law that prohibits workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity or expression, businesses can take immediate steps to ensure all employees in their workforce are treated fairly today."
    Yes, you're being brainwashed to think the homosexual lifestyle is a perfectly decent way of life. Find out how in "The Marketing of Evil" for just $4.95 today only!
    Many companies, such as financial leader Morgan Stanley, are thrilled with their top ranking and use it as a public-relations tool. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=114315

    Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
    « Previous12345678910…566567Next »